Usually To The Right - A Conservative Man's point of view -

First DV clinic founder says "I loathe feminism"

2009-09-24T04:56:00.000-07:00

ERIN PIZZEY set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 - and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence. But what she has never made public before is that her own childhood was scarred by the shocking cruelty of both her parents.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1215464/Why-I-loathe-feminism---believe-ultimately-destroy-family.html

There isn't really a lot I can add to this article actually.

Mrs. Pizzey has some very pointed and accurate comments on feminism and the loss of the family and man bashing along with some very good quotes from the article which I will post.

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish, would result in the complete destruction of family life.

Re-freshing to see a leader in the DV movement say such a thing.

Many years later, when feminists started demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.

AMEN!!!

I was, on reflection, following my mother's unspoken orders. Remarkably, she had manipulated me to such a degree that I was now willing to murder for her.

I would encourage everyone to read this article and also browse the comments sections at the bottom.

The beast called feminism has gone so far that even a respected founder's opinion seems to have no impact on the women who will defend their privileged new social class.

LOL Women love a nice guy with a little thug in them

2009-09-20T16:13:00.001-07:00

What a piece of steaming feminist crap this article from the Examiner is:

http://www.examiner.com/x-22282-SF-Dating-Advice-Examiner~y2009m9d19-Why-women-are-attracted-to-bad-boys-thugs-and-players

Now I won't knock the Examiner they have some pretty good articles from time to time and haven't seemed to far feminist leaning in the past, but what kind of horse shit is this:

All women have a little bad girl inside that would, with the right motivation and encouragement, love to break free. A woman needs a man who can complement that side of her.
And no, the opposite of a "too nice" guy does not have to be a straight thug. It's frustrating that nice guys tend to see the world in such black and white, polar opposite ways. In reality, there is a whole range of men in between the two extremes… in the gray area.

So get this right gentlemen your suppose to read the little slut's mind now and know what she wants at that particular moment.

It doesn't matter that she has the job you were more qualified for, or that she can have you arrested with a little story and a fake tear. No. Your suppose to overcome all this and light her spark by being confident and walking the edge.

Well Bitch I got an edge for ya and I hope you fall off.

Women want a versatile, confident and secure man that can handle himself on the basketball court, in the boardroom and in the bedroom. Women love a mature man, appreciative of family, respectful of women, children, people, and life. Women want a guy with intelligence and education, balanced with common sense and street smarts.

I hope this woman will be satisfied with a few of those points missing since their beloved feminism is keeping men out of the boardroom, the Universities and off the basketball court to pay their child support.

I think it is fitting that women cannot even see they are making what they claim to want an endangered creature. Of course what they claim to want today is never the same as what it will be tomorrow anyway.

Women's Happiness?

2009-09-18T11:14:00.000-07:00

The recent study and paper by Stevenson and Wolfer, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness"? Has been covered on a few men's rights blogs of late. Since I have started back to my 50+ hour work weeks I have had little time to do more than get home and take care of dinner and housework but I have kept up my reading as much as possible.

I came across this article on the paper at the Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcus-buckingham/whats-happening-to-womens_b_289511.html

An interesting article. I found it more interesting as someone who follows Men's rights closely because I feel we men from these sites know the answer that Marcus Buckingham attempts to lead his female readers to kicking and screaming.

The answer? Well to put it in it's most basic form one has only to say feminism. Yet this answer which speaks volumes to the men who have been on the paying side of feminism has no meaning to the modern liberated woman.

In his article Mr. Buckingham brings forth some facts men have known for years yet never seem to get published or any attention in the main stream media. Namely: Women working less hours, women getting equal pay and finally even out-stripping men in wages, women dominating education, and women outnumbering men in middle and upper management and now the fact that more women have retained jobs than men.

I was seriously surprised to see these facts mentioned on anything published by Huffington Post.

But there is more.

All told, more than 1.3 million men and women have been surveyed over the last 40 years, both here in the U.S. and in developed countries around the world. Wherever researchers have been able to collect reliable data on happiness, the finding is always the same: greater educational, political, and employment opportunities have corresponded to decreases in life happiness for women, as compared to men.

The study clearly shows that young women start off much happier than men of the same age but by age 39 the scales cross and men become much happier than women.

These findings typically follow what I have noticed about women and the danger age of the mid to upper 30's I have spoken about before. It is as if as their happiness levels decrease anything can be used or done to try and stop this downward spiral. Anything that is, as long as it is self centered and hostile towards men, it seems.

The article also brings to light that women and men spend about the same amounts of time doing housework.

It falls because when it comes to the sharing of 'home' duties, the trend lines are all moving in the direction you would predict would lead to greater happiness and less stress for women: namely toward greater parity. For example, between 1975 and today women's housework hours declined from twenty-one per week to seventeen, while men's jumped from six to thirteen.

As Mr. Buckingham states there is no reason in fact for women's happiness to fall. They have it all. The article doesn't mention legal matters but we know we can add those to the mix as well.

In all aspects of modern Western life women hold all the cards, yet they are still unhappy as they age.

We men know why. As the 40's close in on these women even the sexiest woman starts to wear. No matter how much money is sunk into plastic or botox. No matter how many hours are spent on the treadmill or how many calories are counted the most a woman who hits 40 can do is give herself a few brief years of playing cougar before nothing works anymore.

By 40 most women today have destroyed the man they had the most history with. The companion that would have helped raise their children. She has wiped out his money, betrayed him. More than likely lied about him and made at least some form of false domestic violence claim during the divorce she initiated. She then lived well off the child support she justified as in the "best interest of the child" that is her new car and the biggest house she can afford with the money while the college fund is empty waiting for the Ex to shell out even more money.

Sure it is easy for women to find a new sexual partner again and again at least till the dreaded 40s arrive.

Yet in the end what has feminism done for these women?

It has left them totally alone and taken away the traditional wealth women had for centuries in the family and with a husband who had been with them through it all.

Feminism destroyed everything that gave an older woman meaning and importance so that now a woman past 40 is just alone.

Feminism actually promotes violence against women?

2009-09-14T02:01:00.000-07:00

At least that was one theory I walked away with after reading this article:

http://enewschannels.com/2009/09/11/enc8664_140456.php

A fair bit of warning the article, although sound from a male point of view in many ways, is loooooong.. So take a drink when ya read it.

I walked away from this article with several thoughts running through my head and there were so many relevant quotes that I finally gave up on trying to remember most of them.

The author talks about how wave two feminism brought in certain values and how women wished to change men but since men are unchangeable it lead to wave three along with the death of chivalry and several other consequences leading to what we have now which is outright war.

Because most women today are feminist-minded if not actual raging feminists, virtually any woman you run into and with whom you actually manage to communicate, especially if they’re single, young or old, will be affected and influenced by the war feminists have been waging against males for decades

This statement is true and I would add to it that even women who seem to go against the mold or deny being a feminist will still visibly get their hackles up and their panties in a wad when you make a blanket statement about disliking feminist. Which just supports the quote anyway.

Moreover, now that men know that feminist-minded women, which are the majority of all women, have declared war on men seeking their obsolescence, how much less do you suppose men will now honor or respect females? How much less will they treat women kindly as friends? If we’re at war, then there can be no kindness, respect, or friendship between the two adversaries involved in combat.

The author goes on to explain that in killing chivalry the feminist opened themselves up to violence and swept away the underlying respect men had for women. Also dressing as men and acting as men contributed to this as well. Something I am sure we are all aware of here.

There is much much more to this article and the text is small but in the end the author basically states that men will not be changed and just like during prohibition will "find a way" to act like men even if they have to break the law to do so.

At heart I think this is also correct but I think the author fails to see a few more dangerous aspects of feminism especially on American and Western society. The end of male dominance as feminist call the history of the West is basically ending what kept these countries strong and defended them. This includes weakening the white race since as a race those of Western European ancestry are the only ones suffering a division because of feminism by and large.

Chivalry which is what protected these women before feminism was completely a European institution so this may explain why feminism is not catching on in other cultures or of it does it will be radically different than what we have seen in the West.

The real question is not whether feminism will win in the end because it cannot win. Feminism can only survive inside in environment created by Western European men which is a biosphere it is killing. Yet maybe it can bring down that biosphere and for those of us who have been handed the current remains of the male portion of that "biosphere" culture, either feminist domination or racial replacement equals the end regardless.

It's all our fault guys

2009-09-13T09:00:00.000-07:00

Well according to this author anyway.

http://www.idsnews.com/news/story.aspx?id=69686

You see the current recession was caused totally by men, and of course as we have seen in hundreds of main stream media outlets that creates the call to get more women into the financial sector.

And when the economy comes crumbling down, crashing under the weight of the imploding financial sector ... that’s right – I blame men.

Had women been holding the reins of the financial sector, rather than men, would we find ourselves in the current predicament?

Ahhhh hey.... you.... Feminist bitch... women do hold the reins for all the money spent on useless welfare and financially crippling legislation.

I could tear this fluff headed entitlement princess' article to shreds but happily there is no need.

All you have to do is read the few comments a no talent feminist hack like her generates to get all the debunking you could ever want.

The first round of lies is out

2009-09-10T18:45:00.000-07:00

Just as I predicted (ok I admit it didn't take a huge brain or anything but damn let me flex some)

The first round of the up-coming Obama bait and switch economy lies have started.

1. Major media Obamaphile sources will start proclaiming the He-cession is ending and the economy is on the rise.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ECONOMY?SITE=PASUN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

"Domestic demand has picked up now that we have shifted from recession to recovery," Bernard Baumohl, chief economist for the Global Outlook Group, said in a note to clients.

2. The obama-nation will start wildly claiming massive job creation and/or saved jobs.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_STIMULUS_JOBS?SITE=NJMOR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Because the economy declined less than expected in recent months, the White House said that translated to about one million jobs that would have been lost without government efforts. The report attributes much of this to the stimulus but conceded it is difficult to say for certain which of the many government economic policies contributed to the estimate.

Hmmmm 1 million jobs huh? But the stimulus wasn't for white male construction workers who are the ones mostly out of work. So who did it go to?

Well I haven't seen any new jobs but I am betting there are more than a few teachers and bored government workers tired of doing their nails that are thankful for the stimulus.

Next step is passing of a health care bill which includes abortion coverage, minority preference for treatment, elective and non-emergency care and coverage for illegals (unless they are all made legal which is just as likely) and reduced availability of health care for seniors. Also either a public option or a trick that will eventually lead to one.

I believe the countdown has started but we shall see.

450 days more or less.

1200 calls a month to a local DV shelter?

2009-09-09T15:13:00.000-07:00

So it is time again for the annual United way donation drive. As I have stated before one event the company I work for does is to take donations to make the few remaining male supervisors and managers wear "traditional" female dress for the day. They then parade the men in drag around to be hooted and leered at by the mostly female employees. Its pretty sad and not something the males appear to really enjoy (at least not many of them).

Every year I am offended by this event and try and hide my disdain since I need the insurance the company offers I have stayed silent on the matter.

However this year the local media celebrity/spokesman gave a speech promoting the over all fund campaign and also made the comment that the local DV shelter, which is a possible recipient of the donated money, had reported that they receive upto 1200 calls a month. He didn't say they took 1200 domestic violence calls just that they took 1200 calls. Hell it could have been 600 wrong number calls for pizza delivery but the implied message is of course that they took 1200 calls of domestic violence against women. Also 1200 calls a month would be about 5% of the local population calling in if I am not mistaken.

This statement along with the added frustration of the "drag queen march" is seriously pushing me to write a letter to the plants general manager and the local director for the United Way to explain why I find these things so offensive and will not be donating any money.

I know the United way has done some other sexist events in other cities like the "average man dating thing" which includes astronauts and nas-car drivers as everyday sort of men.

I am seriously teetering here back and forth. The money isn't that important as I could get a job easily making the same amount of money its the insurance that would bite. Also the state I live in is a right to work state which simply means a right to be fired for no reason and we don't care state.

Not sure yet what I am going to do. Suggestions and advice are much appreciated and I will let everyone know how it turns out.

I just think it is time to take a stand on such things. I am sick of the double standards.

Obama losing white female support fast

2009-09-07T07:44:00.000-07:00

Read this article from the LA times this morning:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-politics7-2009sep07,0,2784900,print.story

According to recent polls Obama has lost the overall white vote in big numbers since April. The elderly and the white female vote most of all.

Among white Democrats, Obama’s job approval rating has dropped 11 points since his 100-days mark in April, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. It has dropped by 9 points among white independents and whites over 50, and by 12 points among white women -- all groups that will be targeted by both parties in next year's midterm elections.

This seems to lend some support to my earlier claim from yesterdays post that perhaps women or more specifically white middle class women are also becoming dis-satisfied with the political wing of the feminist movement.

My opinion has always been that by and large Obama's white support came from the white female vote and that women's special interest groups were the ones who gathered this support for him.

"While Obama has a lock on African Americans, his support among white voters seems to be almost in a free fall," said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse.

As I posted earlier now maybe the time to actively try and gain more sympathy from white middle class females for men's rights issues.

I know so many of them comment that they are not like that, yet still take advantage of every biased law and legislation passed for them when it is useful.

But a guy can still hope can't he?

Is this a sign of a new tide?

2009-09-06T19:59:00.000-07:00

Recently I got involved in a discussion on rape in European countries and how the men of those countries do not seem to want to defend the native women who are the victims of said rape by mostly Muslim men.

Of course my call was that just like in America the native white men had been brow beaten and mis-used by feminism for so long now that they no longer cared. As this discussion grew at least one woman defended feminism but mentioning that the political arm of the movement...

"No longer represented or cared about white middle class women in America"

This statement made me wonder if this is a growing feeling among women and more importantly white women.

Unfortunately feminism has become so attached to affirmative action, illegal immigration, quotas and other areas that race and feminism cannot be separated anymore. Any gains feminism makes has always and will always be at the expense of white men and therefore must at some point begin hurting white women as well.

By the end of the discussion I think maybe the woman, who was very race positive, began to see just how feminism was not only hurting her but all men close to her and by and large bringing an entire race down.

Lately I have begun to notice more conservative and Male friendly women taking the spot light. Is this a sign? Could this also be a reason for the large following women like Sara Palin and Michelle Bauman seem to be getting?

Maybe it is time we as men start reaching out more to women in general and find others that are starting to see what devastation the feminist movement has wrought.

This Answers where one Boy Went

2009-09-05T09:33:00.000-07:00

For two years the mother and grandmother of this boy now age 7 kept him hidden in the grandmother's house. And the state couldn't find him there?

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BOY_BEHIND_WALL?SITE=MITRA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Why or, I guess I should ask how, do women manage to pass off the fact that they use every underhanded trick they can? How is it men and institutions in this country never want to believe all the false rape nor admit that these women simply use the children as tools and promote isolation from the fathers.

Luckily we are making some progress and these matters are being looked into more but so many still go unpunished and these women know they will just get a slap on the wrist so why not do it.

Of course after finally being caught red handed and openly abusing this child by isolation (ok thats kinda an oxymoron) the mother draws her last card and accuses the father of abuse as well.

What selfish, sociopaths women have become.

Where have all the young men gone?

2009-09-04T20:42:00.000-07:00

Labor day weekend is such a drag for me. It spells the end of my annual freedom from work and yet another 9 to 10 months of mind numbing boredom as I go back to my lift and production line.

Since I continue to get paid for my annual Summer lay off I look forward to it and I spend each Summer getting pet projects finished. This Summer I built a new trailer for wood cutting, added on a huge amount to my garden and started a bee colony. OK pretty boring stuff unless your a hillbilly like me I guess.

One thing I always love about my projects is browsing hardware stores and small shops looking for just the right part or something that I can use. This year was no different in that respect but as I visited several stores and shops I did notice something missing..... Young Men.

Where are they all? Certainly there can't be that many young men overseas in the military. The local gas stations which used to be at least half or more staffed by younger men are now all female. Lowes was almost totally women with a few middle aged men working there. It was the same everywhere I looked.

Now that I think back on it I haven't seen a young male filter through the continuous flow of turn over within my own factory in well over a year.

Where are they?

I still see some after the local high school lets out but they seem to disappear after graduation and then show up again after they turn 35.

I haven't read any articles nor has an Internet search turned up any information. Maybe I am just not seeing them or maybe they leave my local area for lack of prospects. I just don't know.

Certainly I hope this isn't a trend.

Femenomics - The estrogen recession

2009-09-04T10:29:00.000-07:00

Thanks to Elusive Wapiti for the heads up on this article from Steve Sailer.

http://www.takimag.com/article/the_estrogen_recession/

I love it when I find a professional writer who mirrors some writing of my own and this article validates my blog post from June 26th.

http://usually2theright.blogspot.com/2009/06/femenomics-220-housing-crisis.html

Women dominated the housing boom and with the help of bogus legislation managed to get very biased legislation for easier loans. Yet feminist tend to try and blame the male "dominated" banking and finance industries and use this as yet another call to replace men with women.

Should women qua women be criticized for helping get us into the mortgage mess?
Of course they should.
Women should be reminded, frequently, that each one of them needs to be on guard against her sex’s tendency to overspend on homes

His article is one of the best I have read in a while I would recommend all males and especially white males to read it.

Cheers

Femenomics - Short term lies to come

2009-09-03T12:42:00.000-07:00

I read an AP article this morning on Joe (ManginaExtreme) Biden and the stimulus package.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BIDEN_ECONOMY?SITE=OHRAV&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

All I can say about Biden is that in my estimation since the death of "Teddy" ol' Joe gets my vote for the greatest gender traitor and Man-enemy number one.

His quote:

"The recovery act has played a significant role in changing the trajectory of our economy, and changing the conversation in this country," Biden said. "Instead of talking about the beginning of a depression, we are talking about the end of a recession."

He goes on to give yet another bogus number of some 750,000 jobs saved since the stimulus package was passed overall.

This fits in with my coming prediction for the Winter of 2009 -2010.

The Progressives in power will lie and manipulate the numbers to support their cause on health care and the stimulus. We are going to see a huge media blitz this fall on how the recession is fading. Will the stock market buy into this? I cannot tell right now but as people run out of benefits for un-employment those numbers will be brandished to show un-employment is dropping when in fact it will still be rising. They have already used this tactic in prior months. Consumer spending is tricky but in fact will rise slightly for the next few months due to students returning to school and individual educational spending that although government funded counts as consumer spending.

Any jobs claimed to be "saved" or created by the stimulus bill will be in education, infra-structure and public funded "charity" programs like DV shelters etc. Just as women's special interest groups planned, this will in fact shore up the bulk of female dominated areas for the Winter and into 2010 but it will not ease the un-employment of the group hardest hit by the He-cession and will not bring in more tax revenues for 2009.

This is Femenomics at it highest macro level. The one hope it has is that female consumer spending and the female dominated housing sales will again lift construction and manufacturing. It won't.

Instead of spending money at the base which has supported female dominated institutions and the female consumer economy they elected to replace the base that creates the wealth with a pool that can only run dry and then start spending out of this pool at such a rate that it will not last. To further damage any chance of a recovery what portion of the stimulus that is going to construction type areas is earmarked Green jobs which is just another way of saying is going to create jobs for minorities.

As I predict look for alot of media reporting from NBC, CBS, ABC, and the left leaning newspapers/web sites on how the American economy is improving. Using these headlines the dems will pass the healthcare bill they want and more than likely the Cap and Trade bill through the Senate. They are already making announcements on how the town hall meetings showed more support for health care reform than against it.

Early next year we will again hit a major tax budget problem and by election time the census manipulation will void out any anger voting by the American majority.

Fall of 2010 will be the true boiling point. People understand there isn't much they can do now but once they see that they can still do nothing in 2010 which direction will they go?

What is up with female pets?

2009-09-02T23:34:00.000-07:00

So my girl friend is an animal nut. She volunteers constantly at the local animal shelter and takes in "rescue" animals alot. Despite spending unthinkable amounts of money on vet bills and such she just can't help herself.

Recently a litter of feral kittens appeared in her garden shed. Luckily the mother cat moved all the kittens but for some reason left one behind. This little gray ball of hissing, spitting terror was pulled out of the garden shed and placed in a kennel cage.

So now the work begins. For instance: The kitten must be a certain weight to be put up for adoption, if it is too small the animal shelter will euthanize it (OK I didn't know this). The kitten must also be tamed, said shelter will not take feral animals and ones who spit and hiss are not adopted (OK makes sense to me). I named the kitten Helga. Why? Well because the first stage of "taming" the feral kitten is to keep it isolated and visit it with food and stuff slowly working your way up to letting it out to play some.

In short the Helsinki syndrome.

Well I must admit she has made stunning progress with this kitten and now it is simply a cute little ball of fur that LIVES to be played with and petted and is in her words "Ready for a home". This after yet another vet bill. The difference in just two weeks is just amazing I never thought that kitten was ever gonna be more than a little Tasmanian devil.

The final step in her Helsinki indoctrination program has been to introduce the kitten to other pets. OK she has a large a number of rescued pets I am not even going into how many but this is when I noticed the most curious thing in the whole process.

All female pets are mean... Not just stand offish but down right mean. This kitten can not get close to another female animal without being slapped or growled at. Yet the male pets are already treating the kitten as a valued companion.

There has to be something here. It is too much coincidence to ignore even the very friendly female border collie wants nothing to do with Helga but the male dog and cat are Helga's constant playthings. The males are downright protective of the kitten yet the females want to kill it when no one is looking.

Is this common in domesticated or wild animals? I have heard of animals adopting other animals but that has always been a female animal thing. It just seems to me that there must be some study out there about this if male animals are more protective than female ones.

Is this the lag indicator for women?

2009-09-01T05:02:00.000-07:00

As the school year begins the full amount of budget cuts will now hit home for female dominated segments of the American workforce. Yes we have already seen cuts and protests against government shut downs (another female dominated part of our workforce). Yet most of the big money cuts in the States which were really in the red were made in prisons and education.

Here is an article about Georgia's educational cuts:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BACK_TO_SCHOOL_TEACHER_FURLOUGHS?SITE=AZMES&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

California's cuts were worse than Georgia's and other states are following. Of course unlike the private sector cuts to construction (you remember the segment of the economy that Obama refuses to give stimulus money to) these mostly female dominated (mostly is an understatement) and tax payer funded institutions will not be laid off, just given some leave without pay.

I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest the start of this school year is the actual beginnings of real change in American society. Until now the female portion of the U.S. has not really been hit with the full ramifications of this He-cession but now this will begin to set in.

Once government and education start feeling the pinch of real money hits it's all down hill. This recession cannot begin to be over until industry and jobs pick up. Most government economist like to say un-employment is a lagging indicator but that has only been a rule with past recessions. What we are seeing today is a recession unlike anything ever seen before. A recession that started because the backs of the real working class of society could no longer support the service only entitlement of feminism.

The final straw which sealed our fate to this economic mess was the outright "theft" by feminist special interest groups of the money which may have pulled us out of the downward spiral we are in.

The question is which way will the change go?

Will Obama cave to the feminist and other progressives and continue printing money to pander to their special interest spending or will it all collapse under it's own weight? Will American society see the danger and rid the president of his house majority? Even if we manage to put the brakes on this spending we still risk massive inflation within the next two years.

Either direction we go I have hopes that now is the time when women will wake up and see what feminism has produced. The smart ones have already seen it but now we may see a more widespread acknowledgement of it.

More on the Runaway Christian Convert

2009-08-31T23:07:00.000-07:00

More news on the case of Rifqa Bary, the 17 year old girl from Ohio who converted to Christianity from Islam and then ran to an on-line Christian pastor's home in Florida.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_RUNAWAY_CONVERT?SITE=CAVIC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

It turns out now she is claiming that the mosque that her parents belong to in Ohio has been stirring up dissent and has ties with Hamas.

Rifqa Bary, 17, said in a sworn statement her family regularly attended gatherings at the Noor Islamic Cultural Center in suburban Columbus, Ohio, and her attorney said in a memo the mosque hosted extremist speakers and supported a scholar with ties to the militant group Hamas.

I had several problems with this story when I first read it but taking a bit more time to think I am beginning to believe that Rifqa maybe one smart cookie.

I had some issue with her running to Florida but it is possible that she knew she had to get out of Ohio and I am sure in her closely watched home life contacts with any Christian group other than on-line may not have been possible.

It has been several weeks now with Rifqa staying in a foster home in Florida and no wrong doing or other "dubious" actions on the part of the Christian group she ran to has been brought forward. I am starting to think this may be 100% legit, not only Rifqa's part but also in the sincerity of the pastor and Christian group. If there was even the tiniest possibility of wrong doing by the Christian group or the pastor the main stream media, which loves to attack anything with European roots (especially Christianity), would have been all over it.

I pray that the laws of Florida and Rifqa's Christian friends can keep her safe and out of the hands of a religion that preaches violence and conquest and embraces such barbarian rituals as "Honor Killings".

A Judge who finally gets it

2009-08-28T21:26:00.000-07:00

Remember the woman from Pennsylvania who called the cops and said she had been carjacked and kidnapped?

Well she was sentenced today to 9 - 23 months for the first of her soon to be mounting convictions. The first two convictions were for misdemeanors that typically bring probation

Here is the AP article:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ABDUCTION_HOAX?SITE=ALMON&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

The judge Jeffrey L. Finley said at her sentencing

He called Sweeten, a paralegal and PTA mom, "a calculating, manipulative, hardhearted woman."

Another good quote from the story

"Your wants, your needs, your wishes and desires came before everybody,"

Well this judge has figured at least one woman out hasn't he?

In typical female fashion Bonnie Sweeten, 38 said she would not blame the stress in her life for her actions but yet the article quotes her as saying...

"I let my life slip out of control, and I did not have the proper tools or coping mechanisms to handle the enormous stress I was under," she said. "My life imploded."

So as per usual the woman once again plays the victim only this time she is a victim of her own stress since there wasn't a convenient man around to blame.

She apparently also stole $280,000.00 from her first husband's grandfather and has several other violations to also account for.

What a charming woman.

The Angry White Liberal AND Feminist too

2009-08-27T22:54:00.000-07:00

I read this opinion article by Matthew Continetti today. It's a good look at how liberal main stream media and reporters operate.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/868ccsmx.asp

I just wish he would have added in some feminist examples although a number of these do cross over (in more ways than one I imagine).

Here are a few quotes:

The King of the Angry White Liberals, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, wrote on August 14 that Grassley is "flat-out despicable." Resistance to the Democrats' plans, Krugman continued, amounts to an "outpouring of hate," the result of "the paranoia of a significant minority of Americans and the cynical willingness of leading Republicans to cater to that paranoia." (For the record, more Americans disapprove than approve of Obamacare.)

I am glad he picked Krugman to talk about first. This guy maybe king of the "angry white liberals" but he is also top ass kisser of the loudmouth mangina association as well. I really need to read up more on this Krugman I swear he must have cut off his scrotum during a woman studies class at Harvard and turned it in for a term paper or something. The useless entitlement instructor more than likely still has it framed on her wall too.

The Angry White Liberal finds it simply incomprehensible that somebody might honestly and in good faith disagree with the Democrats' efforts. On August 14, blogger Steve Benen wrote on the Huffington Post that the "far-right apoplexy is counter-intuitive." After all, "Why would people who stand to benefit from health care reform literally take to the streets and threaten violence in opposition to legislation that would help them and their families?"

Why do spineless bloggers like Benen pander to women and support laws which men (and yes even kitchen bitches like Benen still count as men at least in the eyes of the law) are the unconstitutional victim of? My guess is that most Americans don't feel they will benefit from paying for every immigrants in-grown toenails but Benen thinks he is making points with the "chicks" by being a libtard.

On the Rachel Maddow Show on August 19, Star Times columnist Frank Rich warned that the current debates surrounding health care resemble the "walk up to the Kennedy assassination."

Rachel Madcow. Now there is a screamer. Sometimes in the evening when I am feeling like maybe a night out at the bar might be just the thing and I find myself thinking maybe it would be alright to hit on a few bar chicks. I just turn on MSNBC and watch this harpy - its more effective than a cold shower and a vasectomy with a rusty pair of scissors.

I don't know who Frank Rich is but when I start seeing fliers handed out with Obama's picture and profile and a target then maybe he can compare the "current crisis" with 1964 Dallas.

It is just so amazing how many liberals are also raging feminist as well.

Claire McCaskill says we can vote her out!!!

2009-08-26T21:49:00.000-07:00

I arrived at Senator Mc Caskill’s town hall about an hour early. Parking was already overflowing down the road, which leads to Lewis and Clark middle school in Jefferson City, Missouri. As I enjoyed the sometimes-steep half-mile walk to the school entrance I began to take note of the license plates of the cars I passed. I saw a few out of state plates more specifically two Illinois, an Oklahoma, a Kansas, one from Delaware of all places and a New York plate. So maybe out of the hundred or so cars I passed by six were certainly from out of state. All six out of state cars sported Obama stickers I might add.

By the time I got in line I figured from a rough guestimate I wasn’t going to get in. Later another gentleman actually went and counted and told me I was number 314 in line. By the time the town hall opened the rumor coming down the line was 340 would be allowed in. The line itself was very well behaved. There were several pro-healthcare people walking up and down the line giving out stickers and a lot of people in line with machine printed pro healthcare signs. My estimate was about 60% protestors to 40% supporters of healthcare from what I could see from my vantagepoint. At the time they started letting people in I was at about the center of people waiting, so I would say at least 300 people were not allowed inside for the town hall.

As a side note here, I noticed something that I had already expected would happen while waiting in line. I purposefully went in very casual attire and had no outward signs of support or protest on me. I was simply wearing a T-shirt with the word ARMY across the chest and a pair of shorts. I had the good fortune to be standing in line with a rather short black woman who had immigrated from Nigeria several years ago. This woman was not a health care supporter nor was she in fact a protester yet as each astro-turf supporter came down the line giving out small signs or stickers they pointedly avoided any contact with me but tried to give my line neighbor a sticker or sign automatically. Stereotyping is ok for community organizers I guess.

Once we all got inside the senator was late but the town hall did finally get started. The time for this town hall had been changed at least three times in as many days and another interesting thing I had noticed when signing up for it that the confirmation also told me I had signed up for the Warrensburg town hall not the Jefferson City one. Ok mistakes can be made I guess.

There was only the microphone on the podium for the Senator and those in attendance were required to fill out question forms to be read.

The first question was one asking the Senator if she would vote for the bill if it were brought to the floor under reconciliation? Her answer or lack thereof, set the tone for the entire town hall. She hemmed and hawed and said something about it depended on what was in the bill and then tried to move on. She was immediately confronted by shouts of "Answer the question". A short argument began with the audience and McCaskill tried to defend her round about answer which was this time met with a loud round of "NO you didn’t".

The mood inside the town hall was clearly at least 80% anti-healthcare. Senator McCaskill never really answered a question but gave standard Obamacare canned answers. She attacked the death panel question with the same old not in the bill rhetoric, like anyone thinks the panel is outlined in the bill. Someone near me shouted that it wasn’t about a panel as much as it was about the shortage of care that could be provided. The Senator ignored that shout.

At one point Senator McCaskill said if we the people of Missouri didn’t agree with the way she represented us we could vote her out of office. There was a standing ovation and about 5 full minutes of cheering then.

At the end of this bogus town hall with written questions, no microphone for the audience and no real debate or follow up to McCaskill’s run-around answers the Senator said the one thing that rang true the whole hour.

She said she was doing these difficult town halls because she worked for the people of Missouri and that she didn’t feel anyone in the room had voted for her nor ever would vote for her anyway, so there really was no reason for her to have come.

There was more cheering and standing and clapping with her last statement as people started to exit the building.

Outside a few protesters and supporters of Obamacare had waited and seemed to be lined up on separate sides of the walkway with signs and some cheering back and forth. I waited around for a bit but didn’t see anything developing of any interest and then finally left.

All in all I would have to say this was not a good town hall for Senator McCaskill. Just my gut feeling from her arrogant attitude and lack of any real debate or follow-up questions is, she is going to vote her way no matter how much her constituents protest. With her loose promise of supporting the second amendment and then voting differently it doesn’t surprise me in the least.

Not a hate crime

2009-08-25T12:49:00.000-07:00

Been running alot the last few days and I have another health care town meeting to attend tomorrow but I had to stop and link the AP article about the Christian/Newsome murders.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_COUPLE_SLAIN?SITE=MSJAD&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Letalvis Cobbins was found guilty of 33 of the 38 charges but it appears will not get the death penalty.

This is outrageous and to top it off this was not treated as a hate crime.

Without much time to post I need to say that this "carjacking" was not a carjacking. Their vehicle was abandoned a few blocks from the house of horrors these two were tortured, mutilated and raped in. They didn't want that car they wanted to torture and kill a white couple.

Much was left out in this story written by some AP hack. The fact that Channon Christian was not only raped repeatedly, choked, placed inside trash bags and then inside a trash can to die. The racist scum also poured bleach down her throat, anus and vagina to hide their DNA. There are also other rumors out there about other atrocities I urge you to do a simple Internet search about the couple and read for yourselves.

It is a sick crime and was not motivated by simple carjacking whether it started off as that or not is not how it ended up and for once feminists should be standing next to the people who still have morals and values and believe all men should be treated equal... not just favoritism for those who are darker.

The fact that this crime was not treated as a hate crime is more proof that the politicians who support hate crime legislation, affirmative action and more special interest entitlements are more racist than the white men they demonize could ever be.

This quote from the article especially got me:

Some conservative Internet commentators and white supremacist agitators accused the national media of reverse discrimination by failing to give the case involving white victims and black suspects the same attention paid to white-on-black hate crimes.
Investigators said the attack wasn't a hate crime, just a carjacking that went terribly wrong. Local media and The Associated Press have covered developments in the case since it began.

Ya like they have given it real coverage leaving out more details than Obama on campaign.

Well for once I will say I hope this animal meets some real white supremacist criminals where he is going. It is a sad day indeed when law abiding citizens only hope for equal treatment against racial criminals is left in the hands of other racial criminals.

Have at him boys.

Gender Gap in Happiness? Women are never happy!!!

2009-08-20T22:37:00.000-07:00

So I read this article the other day from the "Epoch Times"

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/21158/

Basically this is an article about a study done by the University of Pennsylvania on the happiness scale of women since the plague of feminism. Or something like that.

Here is a link to the study PDF:

http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/betseys/papers/Paradox%20of%20declining%20female%20happiness.pdf

So in a rambling sort of way they are backing up what I have seen written about on numerous blogs in the men's rights sphere. Women are unhappy!!!

OMG there is a newsflash. Seriously the unhappiness of women is what got us into this bigoted, gender biased mess America finds itself in today. Why? Because women are NEVER happy by and large and seriously NEVER happy when taken as a group.... NEVER Did you get that? NEVER.

Here is a good quote from the article:

It acknowledges the improvements in women’s lives, which militants still take pains to deny with their rhetoric about the “wage gap” and so on. With this crowd, it’s always 1958. Women are supposed to be angry at all times, and angry people, by definition, are not happy people. Many observers, in fact, were not happy with the “Paradox” paper. As some commentators suggested, it could also be the case that the feminist movement sold women a bill of goods

Ya know mostly the only women I ever meet that are happy these days were the ones who were raised before 1960 or very shortly there after and ignored feminism for the most part. Not to say that plenty of women that age or older aren't just as unhappy and as much a shrew as younger women. NO. The key factor in those who figured feminism peaked at them getting a job and embraced the earlier female model they witnessed in their own mothers and grand mothers. Those women are truly happy today.

And yes I know more than a few women like that happy, supportive, STILL MARRIED after 50. In fact if it wasn't for women like that I would have turned on all women long ago but those few good ones made me think there were some good ones left so I kept trying. I have found one who seems to be but again she was raised in a two parent household, had a good relationship with her father and idolized her mother who despite being a traditional mother went on and became a lawyer herself. Now that's a roll model.

These specimen are so rare that I really shouldn't mention them.

The danger as the article pointed out in the end in a way is that unhappy women make things worse and women are still unhappy.... SO they are going to make things worse unless men finally stand up and say....

NO MORE!!!!

Ya know gentlemen I sometimes think feminism was really just one huge shit test (If you want to know what a shit test is follow the link to Roissey's site to the right) and we men collectively failed it.

Save the Whales - PETA Fat Woman Ad.

2009-08-19T10:36:00.001-07:00

I just love it when two groups I can't stand start attacking each other. It just makes me feel all warm inside.

The view on this billboard is enough to make mangina's everywhere act like Ahab and grab for their harpoons but it has women's dominance and special interest groups screaming for PETA blood... LOL get it?

Anyway.

Here is a link on the "Man Hating" Huffington Post about it:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17/petas-new-save-the-whales_n_261134.html

Be sure to watch the Onion video embedded in the article it's great.

For once I must say I do agree with PETA's final goal this is unusual because although I typically enjoy their methods with ads like these:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/21/the-sexiest-peta-ads-of-a_n_217731.html

I never really agree with a veggy only lifestyle but if it will get rid of views like the one on the "Save the Whales" ad AND piss off feminists well maybe I should add on to my garden some.

I am betting PETA wouldn't appreciate my human defense against rapid, hungry, feral dog packs though.

Dog packs

2009-08-18T10:55:00.000-07:00

My very first post on this blog back in April was on the second amendment and the evils of gun control. One of my primary reasons against limiting gun ownership was for defense against animal packs like feral dogs.

Here is the report of an attack which killed two people in Georgia this weekend.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEADLY_DOG_ATTACK?SITE=INEVA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

As our economy slides further into the negative, packs of semi-wild and feral dogs appear more and more. I have long seen the increase in stray animals as an indicator of families moving and housing foreclosures on the rise and so far this year has been one of the worst years for strays I have seen in a long time.

As a matter of fact I have a 90 pound catahoula / lab mix I think, which was just added to my family back in March after he was left standing in my driveway by someone in a brown truck and there are at least two other smaller dogs I have seen prowling around this Summer. I have three choices with stray dogs in my area, adopt them (not financially viable for more than one) watch them closely and hope they find a home, or shoot them as not even the county sheriff will come to deal with stray dogs out here unless they attack someone or create property damage.

Regardless of whether the economy starts to mend housing foreclosures are still predicted to rise for the next few years and people far too often will not be able to take their pets with them nor leave them at full animal shelters or pay for euthanasia.

In the past I have had packs of feral dogs break into my house by actually tearing through a wooden door. That was more than 20 years ago and forced me to replace my basement door with a metal one but the destructiveness and desperation of a pack of abandoned feral dogs should never be discounted.

A pair of feral dogs can produce a pack quickly and become a very dangerous nuisance. You will know a dog born feral as within just 2 generations they will lose distinctive breed markings becoming mostly brown with white tail tips and a more medium hair length. Any person alone in a secluded spot can be in danger but that danger increases as the economy slides and the numbers of hungry abandoned pets increases. Also as cities and counties make cut backs local animal control are usually the first jobs to be cut.

Believe me when I tell you, if you are confronted with a pack of dogs your going to want the best firepower money can buy and not some bolt action deer rifle. The anti-gun left tries to convince the public that limiting what they mistakenly call "Assault rifles" is logical to allow gun ownership for hunting but remove the un-needed rapid fire weapons. But hunting is not the only reason for gun ownership and a bolt action rifle isn't going to do you much good when a pack of hungry dogs comes prowling.

Manginas - The lapdogs of Feminism

2009-08-17T22:18:00.000-07:00

What is worse than a raving feminist woman with her entitlement attitude and ordering everyone around while she mocks everything around her with disdain? Why the sniveling mangina man who caters to such women.

I am sure you have seen them. These are the scrawny guys who are manning the community organizing tables while supporting Obama buttons who can quote all the feminist propaganda about domestic violence, wage disparity and anti-gun legislation all while shoving a voter registration form in your face as you try to walk around them.

If you don't see them at the table commenting on how lovely the red nail polish looks on his fat assed female volunteer partner or describing how a co-workers husband got out of hand with her while trying to defend himself while she slapped him for forgetting the dry cleaning. All you have to do is stick around for a bit as he is off playing go-fer and will soon show up with a round of Latte or ice cream, paid for out of his own pocket, for the self important cows he panders to.

These guys will usually pick out a fairly attractive woman to play their reverse version of fag hag for. They think they have one up on all the other men playing to their sensitive side like they could follow this woman to the bathroom and be included in the group pee/makeup/gossip session. They think it is a mark of their "manhood" to be included as an honorary member of "Chicks night out". Somehow they remain totally oblivious to the fact that they are really getting nowhere while the barbarians they like to bad mouth and listen intently as the women around them complain about, are the ones who get laid and leave.

These guys wear shorts all Summer... Ok even real men wear shorts but these manginas wear them about 4 inches shorter than real men and have thighs about as big around as baseball. They typically sport T-shirts all Summer with logos that read "Paws n Claws", "Save the Hooters" or now adays simply an Obama - "yes we can shirt".

They don't do well in direct sunlight as their glasses tint up too much and the glare from their receding hairlines makes it hard to be around them cause of the reflection. They are prepared though when the sun gets too much and can whip a bottle of lotion out of their belt packs with a flourish.

They are also proud to be the only heterosexual man they know of to have ever uttered the phrase "You go girl". They will call a real man a "Pig" or "Racist" faster than their female co-volunteers can take out a sub-prime loan but will melt into the back once the shouting actually starts.

After the fund raiser or community drive is over they will invite everyone back to their place for wine and a soak in the hot tub. Later that night they will go to bed alone thinking they really scored points running back and forth serving the women wine as they discussed how cute the young boys next door are getting.

They sure got one up on all the dumb ass men out there. They know what women want. But strangely they seem to want that too.

More about the Attack of the four women in Wisconsin Case

2009-08-14T21:29:00.000-07:00

It appears now that the wife who coordinated the trapping and sexual assault of the man in Wisconsin now wants him released so...

He can support his family....

This case is just insane if you ask me.

The follow up article from a local Appleton Area paper is here:

http://www.fdlreporter.com/article/20090814/FON0101/90814113/1289&located=rss

Ok so I have spent alot of time in the Oshkosh - Appleton area a few years back and let me tell you there are some crazy ass chicks around there.

Maybe its the snow and cold keeping everyone inside that makes the women up there insane. Perhaps its the suicidal tendencies anyone stupid enough to drive on ice formed over a flowing fox river would have to have. But those women up there are like insane.

It's really too bad that such an obvious double standard and special treatment of raving violent women has to be plagued with so much trailer trash drama. I guess men will just have to continue to be victims of fantasy rape, domestic violence, and child abuse like this man must have been since his wife who did the reporting now wants him out to support her and her kids.

Sickening. Of course being the man to throw himself on not one but four of these fat assed old grenades should get him a vote for a medal of somekind from all the other men in the area. Hell it should have gotten him bondless release and count as community service when he gets convicted and sentenced.

Anyway just thought I would post this follow up for those interested to see. I am sure it won't get anymore large media attention.

In closing one tip for any of you who read this from the appleton - Oshkosh area. If you date any women up that way and they have a tramp stamp always check it close to see if they have some guys name tattooed on their ass under it and if they have one don't ever mention this blog site.

cheers!!!!

Opinions wanted on the group called "Oathkeepers"

2009-08-14T09:40:00.000-07:00

I have seen this group post on 1 or 2 political blog sites over the last few weeks.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

It seems like an up front group but I didn't see any high ranking or I guess even marginally higher ranking military leadership retired or otherwise supporting it. Perhaps its still really new because I had never heard anything about it before the last few weeks.

Maybe I am just insulated though.

From reading the about section on their web site I cannot disagree with their premise yet having been out of the military for almost 20 years now in an active way it does make me wonder how much the current political situation is effecting the current military.

A few quotes from their web site:

There is at this time a debate within the ranks of the military regarding their oath. Some mistakenly believe they must follow any order the President issues. But you can rest assured that many others in the military do understand that their loyalty is to the Constitution, and understand what that means

Is there really a debate within the military? I haven't heard of one but again that doesn't really mean much I have few current military contacts left to get any answers from.

We are Not advocating or promoting the overthrow of any government whether local, state or national. We want our governments to return to the Constitutional Republic which the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution defined and instituted.

Thats good to know :)

So I am looking for opinions and/or information on how big this organization is and is this a topic anyone has heard about being discussed in the current military.

I don't have an opinion about this group at this time although I do agree with their sentiments I think, but the lack of any open military supporters of a field rank or higher makes me wonder if this is needed or even a hot topic within the military.

If you have an opinion or knowledge about this group please post away. I am definately interested in what others have to say about it.

More on the Runaway Honor Killing story

2009-08-13T20:21:00.000-07:00

It appears the parents of the runaway muslim turned Christian girl are asking some very interesting questions.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_RUNAWAY_CONVERT?SITE=OKPON&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

For one they are asking why the girl had to run all the way to Florida and why a pastor was open to a minor running away to his location.

Another is how she could afford to get from Ohio to Florida without help.

Some very valid questions.

The fact that these questions are newsworthy has me asking some questions.

Would a case like this be getting media attention if say a 17 year old girl ran away and said she was afraid her strongly Christian father was going to beat her or kill her? Would that father even be given a chance to ask questions before he was arrested?

Wouldn't a girl saying she wasn't allowed to fully explore any religion she wanted to by her father be grounds enough for any abuse center or law enforcement agency to immediately accuse the father of abuse?

I am not denying that the father in this case has some valid questions. I am simply pointing out that this case seems to be getting extra attention and more equality in "protocol" because it is a Muslim family.

In a Christian setting all a 17 year old girl has to do is scream abuse and the father is arrested and charged for a hearing.

Or at least it seems that way to me.

I do seriously hope this case doesn't turn out to be some quack luring underage girls to his home and claiming to be a Christian pastor while doing so.

Are Muslim Honor Killings taking root in the U.S.?

2009-08-12T11:09:00.000-07:00

I read this report from ABC earlier today.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=8303567&page=1

In which a teen, who is not a citizen of the U.S., ran away from her parents house in Ohio to a non-denominational Christian home in Florida.

She then declared her father would perform an honor killing on her for converting to Christianity.

The article then goes on to relate another suspected honor killing of two girls in Texas who were, it is suspected, killed by their father for their "Western Ways".

Are we seeing the beginnings of events like Europe is now experiencing? Could things like this have been going on for some time in our country?

As I have long predicted the Western Left Progressives will butt heads in a big way with the traditional Muslim world sooner or later. Muslims are sneaky in their infiltration of Christian nations and typically wait until they have a fairly substancial population base before getting violent.

I know Europe has been dealing with Muslim infiltration for some time now. One has only to look at the Gates of Vienna blog site to read about the daily violence and danger to Western European culture.

With the daily conflict in America between the progressive left and the conservative right it is easy to look no further than our own noses at what may be coming soon in our country.

But that doesn't stop the fact that Muslim infiltration is still happening in increasing numbers within the U.S. and that eventually the very nature of the Muslim religion will cause it to strike against Western Christianity and democracy in much greater force than we have seen previously.

I do not see how people who daily denounce Christianity for narrow minded views on its patriarchy or what have you then turn around and protect the muslim faith. Not only protect it but nourish it and encourage it. How can everyday citizens who's only flaw is progressive brainwashing look at the Muslim religion and not see an institution dramatically more violent, more bigoted, and more oppressive than Christianity has ever been evilly mutated into?

I am certainly not some scripture quoting evangelist. I cannot even remember the last time I attended a service outside of a traditional wedding. But I respect my Christian upbringing.

All Americans need to remember that they owe Christianity and yes Judiasim as much for the freedoms they enjoy today as they owe the abstract theory of democracy. It is always time to defend the first two as much as the last.

Oklahoma uprising?

2009-08-11T11:22:00.000-07:00

A poster from "Gateway Pundit" posted this on a couple of threads from that blog site today.

I just had to share it. No email attached for me to ask permission so I guess if the poster complains I will take it down but I doubt she (JoAnn I figure is a woman's name) will.

There is hope if individual states begin fighting back and not allowing the leftist progressive values of other states to over rule their own laws. Perhaps we can begin to see equality for all. Any reduction in the power of the federal government can only help with the mess we have found ourselves in today.

I posted this on another thread up higher, but this is something the different states can start doing, as Oklahoma is doing as follows:

"The state law passed today, 37 to 9, had a few liberals in the mix, an amendment to place the Ten Commandments on the front entrance to the state capitol. The Feds in DC, along with the ACLU, said it would be a mistake. Hey, this is a conservative state, based on Christian values...! Guess what...We did it anyway.

We recently passed a law in the state to incarcerate all illegal immigrants, and ship them back to where they came from unless they want to get a green card and become an American citizen. They all scattered. Hope we didn't send any of them to your state. This was against the advice of the Federal Government, and the ACLU. They said it would be a mistake. Guess what.....we did it anyway.

Yesterday, we passed a law to include DNA samples from any and all illegals to the Oklahoma database for criminal investigative purposes. Pelosi said it was unconstitutional. Guess what.....We did it anyway

..Several weeks ago, we passed a law declaring Oklahoma as a Sovereign state, not under the Federal Government directives. That makes Oklahoma and Texas the only states to do so. Guess what.....

More states are likely to follow. Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, both Carolina's, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, just to name a few. Should Mississippi act, so will Florida.

It appears the South is about to rise up once again. [Hopefully these and other states will get some 'guts' to stand up for their rights.]The Federal Government has made bold steps to take away our guns.

Oklahoma, a week ago, passed a law confirming people in this state have the right to bear arms and transport them in their vehicles. I'm sure that was a set back for the Kennedys and Ms. Pelosi. Guess what.....We did it anyway.

By the way, Obama does not like any of this. Guess what.....we don't care....we're doing it anyway."

Fems and Mangina's attack God and Guns

2009-08-10T10:55:00.000-07:00

Just as I predicted after the Sodini shootings the feminist and their mangina lapdogs are attacking gun ownership and the Christian faith.

I was reading Glenn Sacks opinion on Bob Herbert's article on the Sodini shootings. The actual article is linked here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/08/opinion/08herbert.html?adxnnl=1&hpw=&adxnnlx=1249927290-W2b/Xa8uoRJYjZUHjRbRHA

The article is straight up mangina writing, typical of a brainwashed affirmative action sort who can further his climb up by pushing down on the devil white men and perhaps impress some fembot white chicks in the process.

What really got my eye about this article were the comments. Over 300 of them when I read it.

OK to be fair I didn't say anything about religion in my write up on Sodini. I actually am a little surprised that religion is mentioned almost as often as the availabillity of guns as to why the violence against women is so rampant.

Of course I saw only three real examples of violence against women mentioned in all the comments and that was with them going as far back as 20 years. I hardly call that rampant but these people will use anything.

I would say almost every other to every third comment post had to do with the availabillity of guns as the major issue for violence against women. Followed by established Christian religion and of course I saw a few posts blaming sports for boys. This is filtering out the constant drone of women as objects etc etc.

Interestingly enough there were very few comments blaming the workplace, courts, or schools as I have become so use to seeing over the years.

I think this shows us what is next on the feminist hit list. They have very little to attack now. We all know how anti-male these areas have become and these comments give us good insight into which targets are next on the feminist attack list which areas have not been completely feminated (is that a word?).

Christianity has long been a target of feminist but it has recently joined so closely with the progressive left and become much more leftist mainstream again. Honestly I have seen Christianity attacked for years but in my view it seems to be reaching a higher level of late. Attacking our right to keep arms will also make us more easily controlled by the police state the feminist are creating.

We must continue to strike back at feminism and attempt to get equality in the areas they have already perverted, but we must also defend the last remnants they have not yet torn down.

The Obamacare Elephant

2009-08-09T10:48:00.000-07:00

A friend of mine once told me that when you take on an elephant you do so a little bit at a time.

Not an original quote I know. This saying has more than likely been around since Hannibal crossed the alps and the Roman soldiers first came face to face with these large mammals.

All the other issues aside on Obama's current healthcare. Forget for a moment it promotes government paid abortion or allowing illegal immigrants care from the moment they cross into this country and before they pay a dime into it. Don't even think about the fact that it will spend huge amounts on women's health issues while men will continue to pay more into the system. Don't worry yourself that until age 55 women use healthcare 3 or more times as much as men yet will not have to pay more for their insurance like men do in auto and life insurance. Pay no mind to the fact that union members will not be taxed for this universal healthcare while everyone else will.

Put all those points out of your mind and focus on one fact.

There are approximately 800,000 doctors in the United States today. This number includes specialist and general practice doctors and is made up of about 20% foreign trained doctors as well.

It takes at least 8 years to train an intern from the time they enter college until they start their internship I believe. I am sure some can get this done much faster and I am sure some do. For emergency medical purposes lets say we count interns as doctors which may bring our total upto around 900,000.

I know that we have doctor shortages now. Long waits to get into see doctors and areas were no doctors are to be found. Yet now the leftist progressives want to start adding almost 50 million people into this mix?

Yes I think healthcare should be available to everyone but it cannot be done the way the progressives are trying to do it. The system will be totally over run and crushed.

To take on this elephant we must start by tackling it one part at a time and it seems to me the first place to start would be with making sure we recruit and train far more doctors and nurses and physician assistants to make sure the infra-structure is there to take on the extra demand.

I assure you the first cry for healthcare will be WOMEN and children first while men are expected to just suck it up and die "like a man".

Protesting SEIU Violence

2009-08-08T14:01:00.000-07:00

So I can get on my blog and post again!!! Hoorah!!!

I just got back from supporting the protest against the SEIU union in St. Louis. I seriously cannot believe a black man can be attacked by other blackmen sounding off with racial slurs and were encouraged to do so by the President of the United States. There I said it he is encouraging this behavior by his community activist organizations and their allied Unions.

I am talking about AFL-CIO, ACORN, SEIU, Americorp, AFSCME, and I am sure NOW is in there too and I am also sure there are several I have left out.

This incident in St. Louis is typical of the double standards the left, WHICH INCLUDES FEMINISM, uses. Blackmen beating blackmen who disagree with them. Using racial slurs but of course the attackers will get pardoned by the Obama racest regime as only white men are subject to hate crime legislation penalties.

Don't let the main stream media deceive you it was SEIU t-shirt wearing thugs who did the attacking.

Here is a link to the youtube video of the attack:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fgatewaypundit%2Eblogspot%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded

I didn't get to stay long at the protest. I just drove up and had a look mostly to see if it was going to turn ugly but the distance and such meant I had to leave soon.

I firmly believe if we are ever going to get equality for men and men's rights we must start the fight against the left and uphold the Constituttion to do so.

I urge you to support the Tea Party movement near you.

Serious Blog issues today

2009-08-07T13:30:00.001-07:00

Tried to post a new blog today and all I been getting is an error and saying somethign about my computer or network sending out automatic hits, so I have been blocked.

Oh well maybe they will get it figured out soon.

Hope everyone else fared better and I will post anew this weekend.

The Latest casualties of the war on men

2009-08-05T13:24:00.001-07:00

I had to take a break and walk around a bit today to figure out how to write about this latest tragedy. I am sure everyone has heard or read about the murders committed by George Sodini at the Pennsylvania fitness club earlier this week.

When I saw the news footage on it I took it for another Man vs. Ex showdown then I read the news articles today.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HEALTH_CLUB_SHOOTING?SITE=MATAU&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HEALTH_CLUB_SHOOTING_WRITINGS?SITE=JRC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

This is simply horrific.

If I were to make this man out to be the victim I would be no better than the anti-male biased feminist that have created the breeding ground for men pushed to the edge that we find ourselves in today. At least no better than them in that I would be presenting the criminal solely as a victim to rationalize his actions. I will not do that.

In reading the parts of Mr. Sodini's blog that have been published (the site has been taken down) I see a man who has suffered from being marginalized, walked over, pushed aside and under rated for years. I have seen many of his postings mirrored on other sites this Summer.

Dec. 29, 2008: "Just got back from tanning, been doing this for a while. No gym today, my elbow is sore again. I actually look good. I dress good, am clean-shaven, bathe, touch of cologne - yet 30 million women rejected me - over an 18 or 25-year period. That is how I see it. ... A man needs a woman for confidence. ... This type of life I see is a closed world with me specifically and totally excluded."

Life is just playing games. ... Every evening I am alone, and then go to bed alone."

May 18, 2009: "I actually had a date today. It was with a woman I met on the bus in March. We got together at Two PPG Place for lunch. The last date for me was May 1, 2008. Women just don't like me. There are 30 million desirable women in the US (my estimate) and I cannot find one

May 29, 2009: "Another lonely Friday night, I'm done. This is too much."

How many times have I seen men write about how women ignore them, or how they have not had a relationship, sometimes they say they have never had a relationship.

This man had a good job with a law firm as an IT person, was in good shape it looks like. Yet as so many men experience these days he was just too boring or too ordinary or dare I say it perhaps too Beta to compete in today's world.

As the media turn this man into the monster he certainly turned into I hope each of us will ask ourselves why so many men in the course of this one Summer have turned to violence and finally suicide as a way to express their emotions.

I can think of six murder/suicides this Summer alone just off the top of my head. All of them multiple murders all of them ending with the man shooting himself. All of them directed at a woman or women.

I am sure the feminist will use these cases to cry out for more special protection, more money, more privilege, more reason to ban guns.

All will ignore the fact that each of these men killed themselves, only a man at the very end of his rope with no other way to express himself over come with feelings of uselessness and marginalization with no way out that he can see will turn his own weapon on himself.

I wish these men, all of them, from the jilted husband in Washington, the down on his luck man from South Carolina, the prominent professor from Georgia, the Santa suite guy from California, and now this guy and the others I don't remember had come to sites such as this one or others. They could have seen they are not alone. If I could have helped them or stopped them I would have.... Any of us would have.

I pray that enough people will begin asking themselves what drives these men to these terrible actions. I hope enough will see that these men cannot be written off as loons in the same mold as serial killers or axe murders.

These men stood at a crossroads that many of us on these blog sites have stood on as well. I wish they had chosen the fork we have all taken and tried to make some changes without falling to violence.

Women Protesting in the Sudan

2009-08-04T12:45:00.000-07:00

I read this article today:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/ML_SUDAN_WOMEN_FLOGGED?SITE=CASRP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

It's about the trial of a 43 year old Sudanese woman named Lubna Hussein. She apparently worked for the UN and was arrested in a public order raid in July on a cafe in Khartoum for wearing pants.

There were 12 other women arrested with her 10 of which who took their public lashings and fines, but Lubna and 2 others have taken it to court.

The police then tear gassed, beat and broke up a demonstration by mostly female protesters outside the court hearing earlier today.

This story makes me wonder just how impervious to feminism Islam may in fact be. Not that I share any religious beliefs in women wearing pants mind you but from what I have seen from the rise of Western Feminism its a starting point.

Watching how feminism and Islam clash over the next few decades should prove entertaining indeed.

It is also interesting to note that Lubna worked for the UN and I am guessing has had considerable Western contact. The authorities in Khartoum seem to be looking for a way to let her off but are having trouble since she has resigned to take this case to trial.

Lets see how fast the Islamic Patriarchy falls to rampant feminism. As I said the first few victories will be reasonable its the coming storm I want to see.

Will Feminist bias ever Bite them Back?

2009-08-03T22:34:00.000-07:00

I haven't written much the last few days. I have seen some good articles here and there but most of them have been covered by other blogs I follow and I don't like to duplicate topics if I can help it.

I did come across this political opinion article today by Thomas Sowell.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/04/utopia_versus_freedom_97757.html

His article deals with allowing the rise of big government and the fact that we trade our invidual freedoms when we support more government.

It occured to me while reading his article that this is exactly what feminist and other left wings groups have done for years. OK I know this isn't something new or a moment of clarity we have all known this for years I suspect. But I felt that it was time to re-address this fact.

What I think we are seeing alot today is that the women driving feminism never got this point. Most women out there have never looked into the eventual cost the simple act of their new "protective entitlement class" has actually brought them.

Once these biased feminist let the government in, NAY demanded the government get in, they were signing their own rights away. Of course it has taken years but as the rubber band contracts on their well worn "special" class they are feeling the bite.

As I watched the news this weekend I saw a female teacher who had been fired because a teenage boy reported she had sex with him. She repeats she is innocent of the charge and the authorities have no proof. I thought if she is innocent she is finally feeling the backlash of 50 years of prosecution of males...without any proof.

Then I read about the four women in Wisconsin who abducted, assualted, restrained and attacked a man for having the nerve to play the cheating game on these four. Of course by looking at these four women I cannot see how he could stomach the act but to each his own I guess.

Then I saw that these women are out on $200.00 bond each and I realized the rubber band of freedom still has a long way to go before it snaps back on women today.

Maybe someday.

An article about DV laws being "out of the callers hands" in some places:

http://www.examiner.com/x-12866-Domestic-Violence-Examiner~y2009m7d29-Domestic-Violence-101-The-personal-vs-the-political--Part-3

Four scorned Wis. Women:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,536296,00.html

Nicole Howell ABC news Article:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=8221857&page=1

Kid locked in attic

2009-07-31T13:03:00.000-07:00

There is so much wrong in this story that I can't even begin to sort it all out.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_LOCKED_IN_ATTIC?SITE=NJMOR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

The only quote I will put up is:

He said his daughter was raised in Lowell and is unemployed. She has been abandoned by the fathers of her boys, he said, and only has contact with the father of the girl.

This woman has three sons and a daughter and this quote says "fathers" of the sons and "father" of the girl?

The story of this woman's life seems to validate everything I have read or written from the men's activist blog sites I visit (Look for them to the right -------------->).

Its just too much of a cliche to contemplate.

YOU GO Arnold!!! But will it be enough?

2009-07-31T11:08:00.001-07:00

So apparently Gov. Arnold is cutting California's domestic violence spending to ZERO, nilch, nixt, nine, none thats like less than a dollar. Ok this is government we are speaking of so zero could actually mean 20 million lol.

Just as I predicted a few months ago California is the first to actually cut DV out totally although a few other DV programs have been cut and closed here and there like in Chicago.

And of course here is the first of the fit throwing:

http://www.ncadv.org/files/CA%20Budget%20Cuts.php

Our nation is horrified by the rapes of refugee women in Darfur and the cruel abandonment of Katrina's survivors left standing on a bridge, and we should be equally outraged that the state of California is abandoning the tens of thousands of fragile and wounded women and children who rely for their safety and future on the services and referrals provided by the shelters and centers. We must work with California's political leadership to remedy this situation and also stand firm so that the governor's cutting tool doesn't continue a swath across our whole country.

Tens of thousands? So there are tens of thousands of domestic violence women and children in California? Since men don't count and don't even come into this protest article they can't count them in. Tens of thousands of actual proven domestic violence victims? I serriously doubt that.

Of course the writer needs to appeal to the "protective man" syndrome and has to mention natural disasters and alledged rape in another country and continent to appeal to this emotion.

On the plus side if California is really spending zero on DV now it is the first time that a true gender equality has been introduced to domestic violence in this country.

I can't say lets hope this is a good start because as I mentioned it isn't just a start. It is a victory if it holds and damned nice continuation of the start. Of course the DV clinics in California will still have federal funding but you know the directors and such won't take a pay cut so this may spawn a closer look at what they do and force them to report and justify their funding.

Awww Poor Little Gurls Go to Jail

2009-07-30T11:01:00.000-07:00

I had to post a link to this article I read over at http://news.mensactivism.org/.

Apparently these two British women (who just graduated from LAW school) Tried to pull an insurance/theft scam in Rio.

http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-news/rio-nightmare-as-young-backpackers-accused-of-scam-20090730-e2o8.html

The local cops down that way, not giving the automatic pussy pass for white entitlement princesses like Western European cultures do searched the girls locker and low and behold the "stolen" items were recovered.

OMG where did those come from... we are so happy can we kiss you Mr. Policeman? /blinks eyelashes.....

OK added that part in :)

Now they:

The Brazilian lawyer representing the two, Renato Tonini, told the G1 news website his clients had been sleeping on the floor in a corridor of Rio's Mesquita jail since their detention on Monday because all the beds were occupied

Poor little girls.... LOL I bet they don't want to sleep in a crowded cell anyway they might get a real cultural taste of the local population.

Ms Andrews's mother, Simone Headley, told reporters on Tuesday in front of her home in Kent, south-east of London, that the jailed pair were "incredibly distressed

They are looking at 1 to 5 years. I hope we will be able to keep up with this case and see what happens in the end.

My bet is the British government will get them off.

I guess all that law school education didn't sink in.

Feminist' Hopes for Obama-care: Sex, Abortion and Money

2009-07-29T22:03:00.001-07:00

As I have been saying for weeks now one of the first things feminist will make sure of is that women pay the same amount as men for any government controlled health insurance. Of course it is unreasonable that women should have to pay more even though they go to the doctor more often. Yet men should still have to pay more for car and life insurance, cause well you know, men deserve to pay more. Well this article shows that I at least called that card a club.

http://health.usnews.com/blogs/on-women/2008/11/07/7-things-obamas-win-could-mean-for-womens-health.html

Interestingly enough all the other issues are about sex, about 100 ways to establish a woman's right to an abortion at any time, place, or condition and then more sexual freedom.

I am seriously surprised there isn't something in this wishlist for free domestic violence something except I guess they already have that. Still I would have thought they would have gotten something else thrown in there for domestic violence.

The part that is especially eye opening is the part about making it mandatory for all doctors, clinics, hospitals etc to perform abortions.

So now feminist wish to force men and women who are morally opposed to abortion to have to perform them anyway. I assume this would also make a pharmacy carry and sell contraceptives and day after pills as well even in highly religious areas. They try to word this as only effecting contraceptives and rape victims but what is being pushed in the bill covers abortions for all women not just rape victims. It is interesting to note that the author skirts this issue and mentions contraceptives for rape victims as in the morning after pill but the wording on this will open it up to all abortions.

Guess we will have an even longer wait for healthcare reform if all the catholic doctors, nurses and hospitals close down.

I am also sure they will manage to get abortions paid for by the government as well.

Admitedly this wishlist is what planned parenthood is currently only lobbying for but a large part of it has been announced in other media coverage as being in at least one of the bills shuffling around.

I only hope the American people wake up and kill this bill before the legislators go back in September.

Boys falling behind in school

2009-07-27T09:17:00.000-07:00

This article which I picked up from http://news.mensactivism.org/

Goes right along with my post a few days ago about how boys are not allowed to be boys and how it effects them.

The article http://www.twincities.com/ci_12910768

Starts by following an all boys class taught by a Mr. Mealey. So far the class has just made it from the first grade but my hat is off to this teacher and school for finally admiting there is a problem and doing something about it.

A few interesting quotes:

Boys' reading and writing test scores continue to lag behind girls', while girls have caught up to boys in math. Check out the names of the top graduates at your local high school — chances are an overwhelming majority are girls. Girls are more likely than boys to get a high school diploma in four years, and they outnumber guys 3 to 2 on Minnesota's college campuses.

Or this one.

"To attempt even to talk about the ways boys can be disadvantaged will upset some people," said Sax, who heads the Pennsylvania-based National Association for Single Sex Public Education. "If you suggest such a thing, you are considered an idiot, a Republican or both. And I have been called all of the above

Ya who does it upset? Why feminist of course. It isn't enough they have taken over in almost every area of life, changed the laws to their advantage. No this shows just how un-human these women are that they won't even spare an once of anything for even children.

A 2008 report from the American Association of University Women presents the opposite side of the argument, arguing there is no crisis in boys' achievement.
"We don't see this crisis with boys, at least when it comes to test scores and high school and college graduation rates," said Christianne Corbett, an AAUW research associate and one of the report's authors

What?!!!!! Two thirds of college attendees are women and there isn't a problem in the feminist equality doctrine? Well of course not because it isn't about equality it is about female dominance so of course there isn't a problem to them.

This is another article that drives home to me that there can be no working together with these women and manginas.

The charts at the bottom of the article are also pretty telling and there are some good comments as well.

Montana, Tenn. which state(s) are next?

2009-07-25T12:18:00.000-07:00

Back in May Montana passed House Bill number 246 which in a nut shell refuses to acknowledge the federal governments gun laws and regulations and sets its own standards for weapons produced, sold and used within the state.

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977674743&grpId=3659174697249471&nav=Groupspace

Recently Tennessee passed a similar bill and the ATF has sent out a letter to gun dealers of each state ordering them to ignore the state laws and to follow the ATF's federal and un-constitutional rules and regulations.

Web copies of the letter here: http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m7d19-ATF-to-Montana-You-will-respect-our-authoritah

The Texas legislation apparently didn't make it to a vote this term but several people have hopes for it in the next session. The list of other states seriously thinking about similar legislation is already pretty long and growing with Alaska, Minn., and South Carolina currently having bills in the house and 11 other states with strong support for such legislation.

What does all this mean? Well as I have written in this blog numerous times I feel feminism, liberalism, and the over-reaching of the federal government to be connected in more than just a left leaning party way. Gun control and the loss of states rights is an issue that feminist groups strongly support as they know only through large government can their agenda be passed without close scrutiny.

To this end I strongly suggest any mens activist support stronger state government and individual rights and freedoms. If you live in one of the states supporting such moves throw your voice in with that support and lets get big federal government out of our houses, bedrooms and personal lives.

Have little boys changed?

2009-07-24T14:27:00.001-07:00

I read this article earlier today:

http://www.norwichbulletin.com/lifestyles/x540127066/Deirdre-Reilly-Parenting-has-changed-but-little-boys-haven-t

I must say the female author has her mind in the right area. I could remember my childhood in the late 60's and 70's vividly as she talked about army men with homemade parachutes, forts and base jumping into snow.

But as I continued on I also remembered my teenage years. I remember at 13 during the Summer packing a lunch and heading out 15 miles away to go fishing all day. I remember rolling our farm truck off a sharp gravel road turn into a neighbors bean field at 14. I remember holloween nights when we stayed out until midnight daring each other to run through the towns graveyard. I remember taking my rifle to school and leaving it in a friends truck (he was 16 I was 15) and carrying my buck knife on my belt all day while attending classes so we could go out deer hunting after school.

And then I think about today.

I remember the first day care I took my son to almost 14 years ago that would not allow any type of military toy period but had a huge selection of dolls. I remember my son being sent home from second grade because he had mad a toy gun out of a bread roll during lunch period. I remember removing every gun I owned out of my house and into my dad's place because the school and social services "suggested" I not have any in my house since my son had been sent home for making a bread gun (see above).

I also think what would these same social services do if my son rolled my farm truck last year when he was 14? What would they do to him now if he took his rifle to school to go deer hunting afterwards? I already know about the knife, my son was expelled from his 7th grade year because he had a folding pocket knife on him. The whole year for a 2 inch blade.

Last Fall I took my son to a movie on halloween. He hasn't done any trick or treating of course since he was like 11. The streets even in the small town close to us were totally empty the grave yard silent.

My son wanted a dirt bike of his own last year, I had to tell him no. When we go out to cut wood (one frequent ritual from my childhood that still gets done today) he loads away like I did at his age but I shy away from letting him run the saw. At his age I could drop a tree anywhere I wanted and cut it up one handed yet today its too risky to teach him.

Maybe boys are still boys but its been my experience that the activities of a young teenager for the passage into manhood are just not "allowed" like they used to be. The tolerance just isn't there and the "cost" is too high.

Let our boys be boys and let our teenagers become men we may need them to be sometime.

Single men benefit from Feminism in long term health?

2009-07-23T10:54:00.000-07:00

So according to this article:

http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20080811/married-vs-single-health-gap-narrows

Single men who have never been married are now approaching the life expectancy of their married counterparts.

During the past 30 years, the self-rated health of never-marrieds, both men and women, has improved. Never-married men have steadily reported better health and now report health approaching that of their married peers

Hmmmm this is interesting. One possible reason is quoted below.

One reason for the trend, according to the study, is that today's society might offer never-married men "greater access to social resources and support" that were in the past primarily found in a spouse. These may include larger pools of never-married people, potentially offering larger groups of friends

Or perhaps one reason might be that men are not working their asses off constantly now to support women and children and therefore have more time and resources to commit to their own health.

I believe we are seeing the beginnings of the Roman bachelor problem now. I just wish I was about 20 years younger so I will be around when this all hits the proverbial fan.

Cheers!!!

Another Article on the HE-Cession

2009-07-22T13:29:00.000-07:00

Interesting article about how white men have taken the lead in unemployment in Georgia.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/07/21/ap6681636.html

What I found very telling is after the writer goes to all his trouble showing that white men are the largest single group of unemployed workers he ends with this quote.

He (someone named Thurmond) encouraged state two- and four-year colleges to increase efforts to recruit minority males. Labor officials will examine ways to retrain jobless workers and encourage them to examine nontraditional careers

I really had hoped to stay completely away from race issues on this blog but it appears I will not be able to. So white males make up the largest unemployed group now but colleges are being asked to target minority males? How is this right?

Just more of the same ol same ol attacks against the white male demons I guess.

In 45 Years Not one white Christian Man

2009-07-21T09:18:00.001-07:00

In 45 years of political nominations for the supreme court democrats have not once nominated a white christian man. In fact they have fought tooth and nail to discredit and denounce any man who has been nominated by republicans.

Here is an opinion article about on it:

http://www.creators.com/conservative/pat-buchanan/why-no-evangelical-justice.html

Pretty telling stuff and an obvious exposure of why the rights of men of all races have been attacked repeatedly by these leftist democrats. This sexism pushes beyond race and hurts all men as the one sure way to attack the white man.

Mr. Buchanan writes that it is against seemingly white christians, but I submit that the real target is simply men. Being white and to a lesser degree christian just makes for an easier target by playing the race and religion cards they still manage to target men in more of the blast radius than women.

It is time to ask these liberals why they are so racist, sexist, and bigoted.

WTF is up with the captured US Soldier?

2009-07-19T21:06:00.000-07:00

AAAAAHHHHMMMMMM.

OK I am not going to post a link to the video of PFC Bergdahl there is a link from the AP article I linked below.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_AFGHAN_SOLDIER_CAPTURED?SITE=VTBUR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

This story stinks to high heaven.

WTF ever happened to name, rank and serial number?

A captured US Soldier should be ashamed of himself being video taped saying such things about his country, his branch of the military and his countrymen.

OK so I was never captured by terrorists while I served in the Army, but OMG does no one else think its interesting this young man is saying the things he is on this video clip?

Am I wrong here? This just doesn't seem to add up for me.

Funny this one is automatically labled Domestic Violence

2009-07-19T20:37:00.000-07:00

This is a horrific crime to say the least.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SOUTHERN_TENNESSEE_SLAYINGS?SITE=ORLAG&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

But note this crime is labled off the bat as being "Domestic" even before all the facts are known.

I wonder if anyone will point out that maybe if this woman had used a little more caution or perhaps not started dating a much younger man this wouldn't have happened and 5 lives might have been saved? Of course they won't and they shouldn't the act of murder is abhorrent and no ones but this mans fault.

No unlike McNair who "should have kept it in his pants" and gets blamed for his own murder this woman is completely in her rights to date a man at least 8 years her junior and have a child with him when he is 26. I would be willing to bet a few hundred dollars since he is a dry wall hanger and more than likely out of a job she is done with him and expects him to pay totally over the top child support now as well.

We will see when they fill in the blanks if they bother to report his full motive anyway.

When a man resorts to violence it is domestic and he is at fault, when a woman does the same thing the man should have known better.

What a double standard.

Way OFF Blog Theme - Harry Potter 6 SUCKS!!!

2009-07-18T14:12:00.000-07:00

OK ya I have read all the books I admit it and I loved them I will admit that too.

But the "Half Blood Prince" Movie Sucks rocks bad.

I don't think the script writers or the director even read the book. I think they read a very short cliff notes version and then just re-wrote every scene anyway.

I can't even go into all the BAD in this movie, Nothing connected together, it didn't flow it was like a 2 and half hour trailer of disconnected scenes.

Ginny is turning out reasonably hot though.

I wouldn't waste time going to see it.

Otherwise have a great weekend!!!!

You kinda do have to give Ruth Madoff credit

2009-07-16T21:53:00.000-07:00

I never really thought about it until I read this opinion article:

http://www.uexpress.com/maggiegallagher/

I mean I really at first wanted to blame this woman as much as the victims of her husband are blaming her. I wanted to see the rich snob woman ont he streets homeless as some sort of retaliation.

Yet this Maggie Gallagher does have a point in this quote.

It was the moment I realized that Ruth could -- with one decision -- make this all go away. All she'd have to do is divorce Bernie. Go on "Oprah" and emote about the victims. Share her raw emotions. Express meaningless sympathy. Publicly condemn her ex. Write a tell-all book about how women need to stay on top of the family finances. She'd be a modern-day heroine.

I would even take it further that all this woman would have to do is say that ol' Bernie had threatened her and slapped her around a bit and feminists everywhere would be screaming for her to have all the money stolen from men as "support".

Of course there is nothing saying she may not do something like this in the future, but for now she seems to be taking it and hasn't spoken out against her husband.

Maybe there is something about women born before feminism tainted them after all.

Not the Father..... Jailed anyway

2009-07-16T09:22:00.000-07:00

This story doesn't surprise me:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_WRONGFULLY_JAILED?SITE=VANOV&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

So in 2001 they find out after the second DNA test proves he is not the father and the courts still require him to pay back child support.

Not only is this story insane and a clear violation of a persons rights, but to then acknowledge that this man has no relationship to someone and must still pay?

And why wouldn't the woman who received the support be ordered to pay back the support she got and be penalized for giving false information?

10 Rules for young guys dating cougars

2009-07-14T12:32:00.000-07:00

Recently over at Novaseekers site we had a lively discussion on what young men want in a relationship. Its a good read I would suggest everyone go take a look. Anyway one poster mentioned how he felt the older guys (we took that as 40+) don't look out for the younger guys these days and I can see his point.

To that end I am gonna start giving advice here every so often, words of wisdom if you will that I have picked up over the years.

So here is the first for young guys dating cougars, which I suggest all young men should try a few times until they find a real woman closer to a reasonable age and without the warpaint in the cracks.

Enjoy!!!

1. Always play naive with a cougar. Do not try and act worldly. These women will respond to a crude opening line but then back way off they want to feel like they are the predator and you are the unsuspecting prey. The more innocent you appear the more agressive they will be thereby increasing your work to pleasure pay out. After the opening line they will feel it is their duty to break you in right.

2. When you get them in bed DO NOT try and hold off like some sex god. No thinking about baseball or world of warcraft talent specs. Just pop off pretty fast then tell them they are so HAWT you couldn't help yourself. Trust me here they will love you forever especially if you can manage to get excited for them again in about 10 minutes or so. If they are nice looking this shouldn't be too much of an issue but if they aren't "all that and a bag of fritos" well then the first comment will still keep them happy for a while and allow you to fall asleep.

3. During the pre-talk discussion work a few comments in about how young women refuse to or can't seem to give head worth a damn maybe even take the stance that no woman has ever even blessed you with such an act. It will almost assure you of some oral action in about 2 minutes flat once your alone with them. Usually of course these women are not very good at it either but never hurts to find out.

4. If they have large breasts and are wearing thin clothing then its a good bet they got some older guy to buy them for her. This is a good thing!!!! These women will always show them at the drop of a hat so do not hesitate to comment on them. Hey they worked hard to pay for these plastic boobs (usually in trade) and they are gonna get every penny out of them. Hum the barbie song when they flash them it helps put it in context.

5. If they have large breasts and are wearing heavy clothing or showing little cleavage then all bets are on naturally large hooters. OK warning going in, expect some sag but these women are usually more appreciative of younger guys so if you can bear it go for it. Once you start undressing them make it a point of kissing the stretch marks you will find. Women like these who can't handle the fact they are getting old have secret fantasies of young men kissing their stretch marks.

6. Do not look at the cougar's super hot young girl friends she tries to hang with. Even when one of these girls tries and gets your attention to make the old has been cougar feel bad just blow the young chick off. After all your goal is to get laid with minimum trouble and this is a sure way to get in the old chicks pants.

7. Women like these cougars have already managed to find, marry and divorce some other poor un-suspecting guy so they really don't care what you do for a living or how much money you make they already have an ATM. However if they do start to ask about your job or income remember this simple rule. Take the normal salary for the average worker in your area and add 10% then subtract 20% of that total for each year you think you are younger than the cougar. If you get to zero or negative numbers it doesn't matter anyway so just tell them you are in law school. If you don't make it to a negative number tell them your father left you a small trust fund.

8. Whatever you do during opening conversation do not mention your mother in any ANY context. Certainly do not say your mother has the same kind of car as they do or hair color or anything like that. Mentioning you have a mother is about the only thing that might send these cougars packing.

9. Do mention you have a girl friend even if you don't and do make sure that you somehow make these cougars think that girl friend is young. If they think they are getting over on some young girl they will start moistening right there on the spot.

10. When she gets you home do not look at her daughter, do not speak to her daughter more than saying hi if she introduces you. When she asks what you thought of her daughter say something like she reminded you of her without the extra sexiness of experience or some such bullshit. Later you can enjoy flirting with her daughter (provided she is over 18 of course) when the cougar isn't around.

If you follow even half of these rules you should have no trouble.

Its kinda sad that most Western women have fallen to such shallow acts as they have to keep their lagging self esteem up but I am to the point I really don't care about Western women and need to start helping the younger men.

To that end my advice to you young guys is use these middle age crones until you find something better. Hey its what the women are doing these days so until we can finally get some equality in the courts, government and social spending at least some men should make use of this time and with the cougars you don't have to act like a drug dealer or thug to get somewhere.

Real Clear Politics does an article on the He-cession!!!

2009-07-13T14:53:00.000-07:00

I so totally can't believe today.

First two count them TWO articles from Science which helped promote men's issues and then this from Real Clear politics:

http://comments.realclearpolitics.com/read/1/381739.html

Maybe now some of the national talk show hosts and such will begin to take note and discuss these issues instead of cowering from the female radical feminist bloc like schoolboys smoking behind the gym.

I have sent emails to at least a dozen radio and TV hosts who attack the stimulus spending daily asking why they don't bring the issue of how it was divided by gender up to no avail.

My hat is off to David Kuhn and to Real Clear Politics....

Live Science two interesting articles

2009-07-13T09:07:00.001-07:00

One on economics and how it is effecting men more in stress levels:

http://www.livescience.com/culture/090713-ds-men-economy.html

And one on Boys performance in schools:

http://www.livescience.com/culture/090701-boys-issues.html

Each of these articles are worth reading. The comments after them are somewhat informative as well with a wide range of comments. Some stereotypical some not.

One of the only ways the mens movement can fight back these days is through the sciences side of things since it can't be attacked and removed as sexism towards women when presented in raw stats or as a study.

At least I think these two articles give some press to the problem and may open some eyes.

Constitutional Rights for a Terrorist?

2009-07-12T16:16:00.000-07:00

Taking a slight break from posting about the evils of feminism today.

I read this article earlier:

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/450999/holder_launches_torture_inquiry_trial_balloon

This article insults the American people and the Constitution on so many levels it boggles the mind. To even mention a hero like George Washington in the same article as that racist Holder is just a start.

To liken islamic terrorists to being treated like uniformed British Soldiers from the age of reason (An age we certainly are not in any longer) is just total insanity. To imply that these very same terrorists should have the luxury of the Constitution which they attack is madness I cannot even fathom. Like something as evil as terrorism could even have been thought of by the founding fathers.

To allow an Attorney General of the United States to stay in office after he shows blatant racism and scoffs at the Constitution by allowing CONVICTED poll disrupters to walk free because of their race and membership in a racial hate group is craziness so complete it can only come from radical left-wing backing.

That these same leftists can talk about upholding the Constitution that they violate in everyway with their hate crimes legislation, gun controls, federal control, special rights for women, quotas etc is just down right insulting.

I wasn't a huge supporter of the Bush/Cheney administration, but if any part of the U.S. government goes after a past President or administration member over the "rights" of a terrorist then I know who I will be defending.

Man Jailed for 14 years over divorce case

2009-07-10T23:26:00.000-07:00

I simply cannot believe this story.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_JAILHOUSE_MILLIONAIRE?SITE=NCKIN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

The judge in his case ruled that he was hiding 2.5 Million dollars and sentenced him to rot in jail until he turned the money over.

Apparently the ex-wife managed just fine without that extra 2.5 million for 14 years.

I don't know anything else about this case but if the man was able to make enough money to hide 2.5 million of it I seriously doubt he would have stayed in jail 14 years for it. With that kind of money making ability I am sure he could have made it all back in under 14 years so I tend to believe the guy didn't have it.

If he did have it hidden then by giving up 14 years of his life to prove a point for men everywhere and for not giving in I say HUZZAH SIR!!!!

Not that I know if he was trying to be a poster child for men's rights, but if he did have it he was holding out for his own rights and we need more men like him.

Liberal Leftist Femi-nazi columnist even turns race into man bashing

2009-07-10T13:47:00.000-07:00

So this article by Allison Kilkenny about the 60 or so black children asked to leave a private club's swimming pool after they made some arrangement with the club manager to swim there once a week is very telling of how feminist will turn anything into male bashing.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/allison-kilkenny/philadelphia-private-swim_b_228253.html

She spouts off all kinds of instances of racial and gender based bans by clubs from several different areas of the country starting from the 1960's. She then lays in several quotes from various male managers of those clubs saying they can ban whoever they feel like.

Heres one quote from her article:

Back in 1992, Bill Clinton was accused of attending an all-white private golf club, though Mark Grobmeyer, the Little Rock lawyer who played at the club with Clinton, denied there was a "no blacks" policy. Why were there no black players then? Mr. Grobmeyer replied, "None have applied."

I love this quote as it seems saying none have applied is as bad as saying "we hate everyone but white men" to her yet did Miss(Mrs) Kilkenny say a word about the exact same statement being made by Justice hopeful Sotomayor last month when speaking on her membership in a woman's only club? I would put my retirement account on NO.

Does Ms. (we will settle for that title) Kilkenny mention that the manager of said club which asked the children to leave was in fact a woman? Of course not.

Did Ms. Kilkenny mention the attack and beating of a white family in Ohio just last week? Nope.

Are any men (white or otherwise) even mentioned in this altercation of the pool and club in Philadelphia? Not that I have read so far.

But yet this is all about white male's and their oppression of everyone else around them.

Get a life Ms. Kilkenny and stop blaming men just cause your vibrator batteries died.

So much for Female empathy

2009-07-09T22:32:00.000-07:00

This interview with justice Ginsburg is perhaps one of the most telling I have read showing pro-female bias and a lack of anything even approaching empathy or concern for male views or emotions. OK there is one comment that has some color of empathy for males in it listed below.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1

A couple of times justice Ginsburg even mentions women's feelings about some cases. One that stands out is a comment on the recent strip search case about girls and boys feeling different about it (also quoted below).

Other quotes of note were:

Q: Do you have a sense of what that would be like to actually work on and how it would be different? (Asking about a court with 5, 6 or 7 female justices)

JUSTICE GINSBURG: The work would not be any easier. Some of the amenities might improve.

Ya I bet they would improve, the way women in power like to pamper themselves.

Q: Do you think that some of the discrimination cases might turn out differently?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: I think for the most part, yes. I would suspect that, because the women will relate to their own experiences.

May I please never live to see that day.

JUSTICE GINSBURG: I think it makes people stop and think, Maybe a 13-year-old girl is different from a 13-year-old boy in terms of how humiliating it is to be seen undressed. I think many of [the male justices] first thought of their own reaction. It came out in various questions. You change your clothes in the gym, what’s the big deal?

Hmmmm even if the search is done with female only officials? Interesting how would that be different than a boy being strip searched? I see no reason why it should under the feminist doctrine of nurture over nature.

They were held back by a way of looking at the world in which a man who wasn’t married simply was not responsible. There must have been so many repetitions of Madame Butterfly in World War II. And for Justice Stevens [who voted with the majority], that was part of his experience. I think that’s going to be over in the next generation, these kinds of rulings.

The one thing she said that I can actually agree with and applaud her for.

Q: The case ties together themes of women’s equality and reproductive freedom. The court split those themes apart in Roe v. Wade. Do you see, as part of a future feminist legal wish list, repositioning Roe so that the right to abortion is rooted in the constitutional promise of sex equality?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Oh, yes. I think it will be.

All I can say is EEEEEEEEP!

Q: When you say that reproductive rights need to be straightened out, what do you mean?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: The basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman.

But By God every woman shall make this choice for a man, his opinion has NO weight.

JUSTICE GINSBURG: The poor little woman, to regret the choice that she made. Unfortunately there is something of that in Roe. It’s not about the women alone. It’s the women in consultation with her doctor. So the view you get is the tall doctor and the little woman who needs him.

But again the MAN has no place here....

Q: In the 1980s, you wrote about how while the sphere for women has widened to include more work, men haven’t taken on as much domestic responsibility. Do you think that things are beginning to change?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: That’s going to take time, changing that kind of culture. But looking at my own family, my daughter Jane teaches at Columbia, she travels all over the world, and she has the most outstanding supportive husband who certainly carries his fair share of the load. Although their division of labor is different than mine and my husband’s, because my daughter is a super cook

I guess when it might be taken as something positive about men justice Ginsburg's "personal expierences" have no weight. Despite her daughters marriage to a kitchen bitch men in general are still pigs to her eyes and across the country don't do any domestic work.

The one good thing about the interview in my opinion is that justice Ginsburg is 72 years old. I just hope she waits till 2013 to retire though or we will just get more of the same from our mangina President Obama.

How do we get through to these people?

2009-07-09T11:09:00.001-07:00

Well not much to write about in the news the last few days so I guess its time for another observation post.

I spent most of the day Wednesday with a group of 6 old retired guys. Now I am not gonna knock their age as it ranged from like 65 to 70 I can't say much as of course they are our future. Yet I noticed a disturbing trend among them.

Several years ago I had gotten behind in my child support. Not from lack of payment from the fact I had switched jobs and the state CSE didn't start taking it out despite the fact I sent in payments (Never credited to my account) and sent change of employment notification. I quickly got about 4000 bucks behind.

Not being stupid enough to hand my ex any real money or send in payments with money orders (the receipts saved my ASS I might add) that seemed to disappear I opened up a seperate savings account and deposited the monthly sum there. Anyway to make a long story short after about two years they did indeed come looking for me and the only thing that saved me were the receipts from payments made and never credited and the fact that I had the money ready to give it up. Of course the interest didn't even begin to pay the lawyer fee and it is still interesting to note that my EX is now more than 10 times further behind then I ever was and yet nothing has been done.

why is this story important? Well it showed me just how out of touch my father had become. While talking about the charges and my legal bills my father who is not a stupid man made the comment that I should just show up without a lawyer because of my low paying job I would be assigned one. I can only assume he still thinks we are in the 1960's when constitutional rights still mattered. While in court I saw the judge proclaim several people able to pay for a lawyer based on the fact they had had a job within the last 3 years and had no disability. So I conclude court appointed lawyers are long a thing of the past yet me father had no clue and didn't believe me when I pointed it out.

I got the same response from the other men yesterday. Not about that issue but issues on domestic violence, child support, you name it. None of these guys realize how these issues effect younger men and they cannot even fathom the lengths some of these have gone to. One man in particular, a retired lutheran school principal, couldn;t even believe the latest percentages of women vs. men in college. He was sure in his own mind more men went to college than women and was still certain as well men make more money then women.

This is the underlying problem we as anti-feminists face. Men in general fail to see an issue that does not effect them directly. I understand how these gentlemen can still be living with 1960's attitudes. They have never really had to face being constantly passed over because management is afraid a woman might complain, they never had to pay crippeling child support or alimony. Hell my father paid something like 100.00 a month back in the 70's and if he missed a month he doubled the next month to make up and my mother back then just put it all in my savings account until I finally told my dad to stop sending it because I had a job when I was 16 years old. No courts and no one cared and my mother did not see it as her payment anyway.

Most of these men have been married to one woman for almost 50 years and have no clue. A few had daughters so of course they are all for any pro-female actions.

The day left me slightly down trodden as I see no way to get through to men like these nor anyway to get through to the millions of men who are (in their minds) happily married for the moment. Until we find a way to get these issues out in the open men will continue to hide their heads in the sand and err to the side of chivalry.

Even right wing journalists like Fox news almost daily have politicians and others asking where did the stimulus money go. Yet not one person has brought up the gender gap in how that money was appropriated.

HOW do WE get Through to THESE People?

More Women's programs closing

2009-07-07T09:58:00.000-07:00

This article from "Woman's eNews": http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/4062

Details some closings and funding cuts for several women's groups and programs around the country. Some started as early as 2007 it seems. I seriously hope we see more of these as the down turn catches upto the leftist and feminist spending spree of the last 30 years or so.

A few interesting quotes:

More men got laid off than women, so women are 'bringing home the bacon,'" she said.
As more women provide the bulk of household income, Coffey says this raises classic issues for women's commissions: equal pay, childcare, and maternity-family benefits.

First off I have to give them credit they are openly admiting that more men than women have been effected by the He-cession, yet they are now using this as an argument to defend spending for women's programs. Ahhh well that figures. I bet they will pushing 4 day work weeks and less hours like that "woman-omics" book was pushing a few months ago.

"Women are not being put into the lifeboat first, they're being thrown overboard," he said. "How shortsighted and stupid do we have to collectively be to stop funding women's commissions, the only access, voice and power in government for girls and women, when issues of gender inequality still require far more federal government attention?"

Ahhhhmmmm OK. This statement was from some mangina named Jack Tucker, a lawyer and founder of a woman's rights group in New York.

Wouldn't the whole women and children first cliche be insulting to feminist? I guess like divorce laws and such it's only insulting until they can use it for their own benefit.

Kitty Kunz, president of the Idaho State Women's Commission, said her commission's closure was pushed by state Sen. Joyce Broadsword, who believes women no longer need special political representation or assistance

Sen. Joyce Broadsword!!!! I love the name and kuddos to you!!!!

I take this whole thing as a good sign. Perhaps simple economics will return some balance to a country sorely in need of justice.

At least it gives me some hope.

Breast feeding drunk

2009-07-06T13:06:00.000-07:00

Here is a classy story:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DRUNKEN_BREAST_FEEDING?SITE=MAQUI&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

You may have seen this in the news last week. The woman in question called the police saying her boyfriend beat her. According to the story the boyfriend hasn't been arrested yet and wasn't there but the police arrested the woman because she was drunk and breast feeding her 6 week old baby.

Now some female activists are coming to her defense.

"Since when is breast-feeding while drunk a crime?" said Dr. Amy Tuteur, a retired obstetrician and gynecologist in Boston who has been following the case on her Web site, the Skeptical OB.
If the 26-year-old woman had been bottle-feeding her baby, "no one would have bothered to check what was in the bottle," Tuteur said. "You can do a lot more damage by mixing formula wrong."

Now correct me if I am wrong as it has been a few years since my college psych class but doesn't alcohol pass through the body of the imbiber? As I understood it it basically goes everywhere as it is lighter than water and the only organ that traps it is the liver. So wouldn't this alcohol be flowing into the baby fromt he mother?

We won't go into the parenting while drunk issue here, but should'nt the father have some say in what is consumed and passed on to his child as well?

Unless I am wrong about how alcohol travels through the body I cannot see how anyone could defend drinking and breast feeding but I am sure the female activists will twist it around to defend it and more than likely get money for it too.

Another Feminist article about men not being men

2009-07-03T11:22:00.000-07:00

Well sort of.

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/jun/30/women-actually-do-need-men----real-men/

Basically the same thing we seem to be seeing more and more as these feminist hoes get older and start seeing their lives of being too old to breed laying out in front of them.

Men have been repositioned and don't know where they really belong or what they should be doing. Men are afraid to perform "acts of chivalry" Yadda yadda yadda.

What struck me most about this article is not the article itself but the comments after the article.

These posts from someone named RD were funny and telling. Not sure if this person has visited this site but I would vote for him as an "official hero" of men.

In response to RD...wow those are some really interesting questions you are asking. You had me laughing out loud for a sec, but then I had to step back and ask...is he serious on some of these??Wonderful article! I love it!"

Yes, I'm serious.A relationship is a two way street and women have as much responsibility for making it work as men.There is a common assumption that men are always the bad guys, that men need to get their act right but that women have no need for improvement.Men are generally considered to be selfish and dangerous and women gentle, nurturing and caring while children in America are in far more danger of being murdered by their mothers than by their fathers.Women cheat on their boyfriends and husbands at a rate that may equal a man's cheating.Women also abandon their children, many women do not work while the man works two or more jobs to support the family.It was men who died in cave-ins and explosions in the coal mines and spent the latter days of their lives unable to lift a fork to their lips due to the black lung they suffered from inhaling the coal dust; all in support of their families.It was men during the great depression who hopped the freight trains and slept in the cold on strange city streets moving form city to city searching for work to support their families.Until just recently it was (and mostly still is) men who were sent to the battlefields to be shot and have their limbs blown off with many suffering the humiliation and hurt of receiving the "Dear John Letter" from wives and girlfriends back home who had found new boyfriends among the men who did not have to go to war.During a divorce it is nearly always assumed by the courts that the children are better off with the mothers no matter how bad the mother actually is and I've seen untold numbers of men whose lives and relationships with their children were destroyed by selfish and self serving women who decided they didn't need the man anymore and who received everything in the settlement.Men get a bum rap and frankly I do get tired of the poor, innocent, noble abused little woman and men are dogs routine.Maybe some of those men would feel it was worth going to a job everyday if shawty had a bit more respect and treated him as though his needs mattered as much as hers.Maybe if she was a good woman he would be a good man.Or maybe both of them are jerks.But its always easier and more convenient to blame it all on the man.It just gets tiresome.

And here is another one:

“Very well said RD!!”
Thanks, but a bit overdone maybe.I actually respect Ms. Stout and enjoy her articles.This just struck a nerve for some reason.But Rudyard Kipling was right about the female of the species in my opinion.Take the female Praying Mantis for instance.She’s an insect feminist and eats the head off her mate.I don’t know why.Just to prove she can I suspect.And she raises little feminist females who set around begging “Mommy, Mommy, tell us the part about eating Daddy’s head again…that is sooooo cool!”Brutal little creatures they are.And the Black Widow spider eats her mate as well.Poor guy, there he is running about minding his own business, not bothering a soul until she shows up, strutting about on that fancy, big, shiny, mansion of a web, all dressed up in that bright hourglass outfit, shaking her tush, enticing him in whatever manner a Black Widow spider uses to entice a male…and man is he conflicted.She looks good, prettiest little arachnid he’s ever seen in fact, there’s no denying that; but in the back of his mind he can hear his buddies, “Don’t go gettin' mixed up wid no shawty dude, it’ll kill ya.”And he knows what’s coming and he fights the urge, moves toward her, backs off, tries to focus on something else, moves toward her and backs off; but she just sits there, singing that irresistible siren song, batting those eight big beautiful eyes, promising him a touch of heaven; and all he has to do is man up and go for it.Yeah, he knows better, but what does he do?Why, he finally can’t hold back anymore and its “Que Sera, Sera“ (Whatever will be will be) and he throws caution to the winds, flings himself into all eight of those outstretched arms; and its wham, bam, thank ye’ ma’am and love til’ death do them part.But then, and this is probably the part she likes best; after she lays her eggs it‘s “Thanks dude, it’s been real,” and yum, yum eat em’ up!Poor fool.A female squirrel after giving birth will raid the nests of her neighbors and eat their young to replace her lost protein and quite likely when the news gets out will blame it on a cat or some other innocent creature that doesn‘t even like squirrel meat.A female gorilla will kidnap, kill and eat the offspring of her rival for the silverback’s attention and then swear she was off visiting her cousin Tarzan when the kid disappeared.Female chimps will do the same.If the offspring of a female lion is injured or deformed in any way she will eat it.Females of all species can be incredibly vicious and knowing that I can tell you, I don’t have any desire to hook up with shawty.If I find myself in need of company I’ll get a gerbil.A male.At least he can’t kill me and eat me if he gets irritated or hungry.

I don't normally cross post others opinions from other places but this guys post deserves to be kept for all times somewhere I know how to get to it.

As I have always said to quote James T. Kirk "Don't believe them, don't trust them.... Let them Die"

Homeless Men

2009-07-02T12:10:00.001-07:00

I have been reading alot about homeless men recently. The numbers of homeless men as compared with homeless women are very telling of the current bias in American society today. I found incidences of shelters forcing homeless men into condemned buildings and even one report of men being forced to leave shelters to make room for women.

I could find no real overall data on the actual numbers of shelters available to men, women, children or any combination of the three. I did several general searches on specific areas and found that usually men only shelters were a very real minority in most cases being out-numbered by womens only shelters 10 to 1. Most cities had to have a population of over 200,000 before they even had a male only shelter where as women only shelters (and every women only shelter also allowed dependant children) were common in communities of 50,000 or less. I counted private as well as public shelters and of course my searches were pretty limited but more than likely more exhaustive a search then a normal homeless man would be able to initiate.

These numbers are interesting when you take into account that over 50% of all homeless people are men leaving women and children to fill out the other 50%.

Finally men get to dominate some field in America I guess.

This quote from the 2006 HUD report about why men seem to be allowed to stay shorter periods in shelters read:

The shorter lengths of stay
among unaccompanied males also may be affected by daily turn-out policies – i.e., policies
that require all homeless persons to exit the shelter after a one-night stay before returning the
next night. Such policies are more often used in men’s shelters. Shelters for women are less
likely to have turn-out policies that require daily exits

Take this information as you will. There is plenty of documentation out there although I couldn't find a source just comparing men's examples to women's.

Just another example of how a dis-portionate amount of this country's social money is spent to appease women and leave men out in the cold.

Maybe this is the beginning of changes

2009-06-29T11:38:00.000-07:00

The fight of the Newhaven firefighters was one that I followed pretty closely.

Honestly if the supeme court had ruled in favor of the city of Newhaven my loyalty to the government of this country would have ended. Oh I would have followed all the laws and paid my taxes of course but if the supreme court had not ruled against this discrimination of whites and a hispanic (I have read there were 2 hispanics in some articles) then that would have been the end of my oath as it touches onto the current government of the United States.

Heres an article of the ruling: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_FIREFIGHTERS_LAWSUIT?SITE=TXMCA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Of course four of the judges still went the wrong way which in my mind makes this entirely too close a call for something this important. How ANY judge can rule against these men or fail to see the discrimination here is beyond me. We have a half African President, Women in the other highest offices, a black man in charge of the GoP, the list is endless. There is no further need for these laws favoring minorities and in fact all they do is discriminate against whites forcing them to pay for "crimes" they had no part in. In fact my mostly Irish decent means my family suffered from discrimination almost as bad or worse depending on where they were at the time in America. Yet despite that I had several ancestors who offered up their lives to right the wrongs against minorities and in my own way I have sacrificed for this dream as well and it is about time we are all treated equal.

For the judges who ruled against this travisty I salute you and you have restored at least some of my faith in at least one branch of our government.

The Name Game

2009-06-27T12:22:00.000-07:00

If justice finally caught upto my ex-wife it was slow in coming. As you know I like to relate my direct stories from time to time to back up some of the articles and other blogs I read. My Ex who had a warrant out for her arrest for over a year not to mention the child support people saying they "couldn't find her" for over 3 years finally got some retaliation thrown her way.

Earlier this month ex-wife hoe was sentenced to 6 months home detention, five years supervision and ordered to pay $40,000.00 restitution to a former employer.

I guess this means child support and the court officials will know where to find her now for the other summons they have for her. Not to mention she filed for divorce from husband number four this past week.

The only good information I have ever gotten from my lawyer in over 3 years lol.

So more to the title. The reason I was given for the lack of any forward momentum in tracking my Ex down for three years was that she had moved repeatedly (6 times in 3 years). Had changed jobs over and over (I have no clue how many have'nt cared to talk to her in over 4 years myself). Yet most importantly she would change names like a chameleon on a patchwork quilt.

Seriously the courts need to find a way to keep track of these women who change their last names faster than they can practice serial monogamy. As far as I know only felonies have SSNs attached to them. Of course as I posted sometime ago women get femony convictions so I am sure the rules are different.

Anyway wish me luck looks like my long wait for this is finally coming to an end. What truely scares me is that even with her long list of infractions the deck might still be stacked against me in the pro-female courts.

Have a good weekend all!!!!

Real Housewife hides behind her children

2009-06-26T22:15:00.000-07:00

I have heard about these shows but never felt like punishing myself enough to watch one. Ok so I also don't understand how this woman can be a "real housewife" if she is dating around but who knows what the feminist porn television has become these days.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_REAL_HOUSEWIVES_SEX_TAPE?SITE=PAYOK&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Apparently this woman screws some guy for a few months then dumps him. Nothing unusual there with these women I guess but this guy has secret video tapes and photos of her in the "act". It leaks out through some interview the rejected guy gives and so she takes him to court over it.

No reason for me to care or even take notice until......

Outside court, Staub said Zalewski was trying to get back at her and her two daughters, ages 11 and 15, for her breaking up with him

and

This is about my kids," Staub said. "I'm a big girl. Do what you want to me. But you broke bread with my children. Don't do this to me. No adult should ever do this to a child."

How the hell does a jilted man giving out pictures of this woman have anything to do with her kids? I mean without throwing out some theories that would put me in the same catagory as David Letterman I can't see this as an attack on these children. I would say that at the worst he is just not thinking about them at all.

But thats what women like this have always done, they grab their meal ticket/pay check and try and bring more sympathy for themselves with their children.

Femenomics 220 - The Housing Crisis

2009-06-26T12:08:00.000-07:00

I spent the last couple of weeks researching a theory of mine about the latest housing bubble burst and the current U.S. economy. What I found didn't really surprise me. The relationships between liberal pro-female legislation concerning lending and home buying and mandatory child support laws gave women an edge in the home lending arena.

This article lists some of this legislation and it's effect on banks and lending : http://orient.bowdoin.edu/orient/article.php?date=2008-10-24&section=2&id=3

In 1987 single women made up about 10% of home purchases. By 1997 that figure had jumped to 18%. By 2003 it had jumped to 22%. Men stayed flat over this time at about 9%. Yet other studies show that women make up a higher percentage of sub-prime and A rated loans compared to men in the same income bracket. What the sub-prime study didn't show was the overall credit score relation or the amount of income from child support or government support in each income bracket. Sadly I cannot find any figures on percentages of those numbers in overall income.

Also in the late 90's child care was removed as a living expense in home loan acceptance.

More recent figures showed Fannie Mae as estimating single female home ownership to increase to 28% by the end of 2009, yet one report from the Realty Times reported 40% of all home buyers being women in 2007 again while single male home buyers percentages remained flat or even reduced in numbers. Single women also became the largest group of buyer in condo sales (47%) during this time.

My research leaves alot of holes and unanswered questions. Studies show that more women than men took sub-prime loans. Sub-prime loans are the most widely blamed cause for the housing bubble yet without figures for how much income was reported from child support, alimony or government support I cannot prove any hard facts. I also was unable to find any statistics related to gender and recent foreclosures. I am assuming that will take a few years to show itself.

What is interesting is that if you take what I believe is the average years child support would be paid, roughly 7 to 9 years, and add that to the beginning of the single female housing boom numbers after the loan legislation became law and took effect you get to about 2007. Just the time period economist started seeing a real problem develop with sub-prime loans. How much effect the He-cession and men finding themselves unable to pay support has had remains unclear.

The only true relationship that can be made at this time is that single women make up the largest portion of home loans by gender, although they still MAY, and that is a not confirmed since 2005, be the second largest overall behind married couples. If they haven't caught up to married couples they are right behind them thats for sure. Single women home buyers also make up the highest number of sub-prime and A rated loans and it is these loans which caused the housing bubble.

I think the final conclusion is obvious but I will leave that upto you to make until the overall figures on foreclosures become available.

One final factor which I became aware of was the accusations that women were "saddled" with sub-prime loans more often than men. Again I could find no mention of credit scores in the overall findings of who was offered what type of loan only overall income levels. One quote I found pertinent was:

A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study found that mortgage
borrowers that lack financial information and those that are reluctant to negotiate
aggressively are more likely to receive higher cost mortgage loans

I find it difficult to believe that women are being discriminated against in home loans with the current government regulations on such things. My take is still on the overall credit scores.

In the end we will have to see how the final figures come out but I am putting my money on a much higher ratio of loan defaults by women compared to men.

Hate Crimes Bill

2009-06-25T12:53:00.000-07:00

Ya know I really don't have a problem with gay men. In fact with the way American women act these days I would be gay if I could choose it. That sort of lends some credit to the gay statement that gays are kinda hard wired (Pun intended) to be gay and there is nothing they can do about it. Well I am wired to be so not gay it isn't even funny. Still to each his own and I at least envy them the fact that female sexuality has no influence on them.

As for gay marriage well I think the term marriage is a judeo-christian term and since being gay kinda is against those religions then maybe gay men and women should found their own religion and name their unions something besides marriage, but I digress.

My problem is with this hate crime bill. Why do minorities or those who try and say they are minorities like women need this bill? Violence is illegal regardless, every person is protected by the state regardless of any race, gender, creed, sexual orientation etc. (OK except white men).

Basically it is saying any of these minorities can attack a white man and it isn't a hate crime but if anyone attacks a minority it is. How is that fair?

Anyway here is an article from a pro-gay source about it. Funny it is championed by AG Holder the same guy who dropped all the charges against the b;ack panther voteing station terrorists earlier this year.

http://advocate.com/news_detail_ektid93360.asp

I would suggest we write our congressmen and senators and tell them how racists/sexist/whathaveyou this bill is.

Another Affair

2009-06-24T12:55:00.000-07:00

Just great this along with the other senator from Arizona or where ever is just gonna give the feminist groups a hay day.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SC_GOVERNOR_WHERE?SITE=KFWB&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

If he kept it secret for a year or more and his wife knew and didn't throw a fit, why not just let it go till he was out of office.

At least he didn't go for an American woman so he has some brains.

Not enough bake sales

2009-06-24T10:00:00.000-07:00

"Not enough bake sales to keep us in business" was the quote at the end of this article from Reutgers on the closing of a womens shelter near Chicago.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55N2NM20090624?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=11569

All I can say is its about time.

As feminism has pushed the U.S. government to fund these centers and shelters for women only, has pushed and received legislation that further lined the common female's pocket not only at the ex-husband's expense but at a cost to tax payers as a whole. And finally while backing every other social or animal rights legislation or special interest group in a cooperative action to lend more weight to their own moves, this country has run out of money.

The article also mentions how children are being placed with relatives now other than government run facilities, without the tests and what have you. To this I also say it's about time. This is how it should be, people should take care of their own.

I don't really know how this is going to turn out in the end. I am not some fall of civilization nut although I have always been happiest away from the city and have planted my 40 acres to be able to help keep my son and I alive if things fall apart.

I can tell you in the last few months the number of "stray" animals on my little hobby farm has grown higher than I have seen it in 20 years. One huge spotted lab cross dog has already moved into my house and lays at my feet as I write this. I have learned over the years that it is a good indication of bad times and this is the worse I have seen it since the middle 1980's and maybe worse than it was then. This animal was not some random born in the wild stray either he is well behaved and has lived inside a house before. The number of stray cats I see slinking around my barn has doubled in the last two months as well. Luckily the dog is male I am thinking about only sheltering males now.

As more and more men suffer job losses and are jailed because they cannot pay the crippling support to greedy ex-wives and as more and more money is sent where it isn't needed to fund more sexest womens "concerns" this will just get worse.

Sadly the most dangerous aspect of this is not the women's groups. Its the fact that it happens while we have a mangina president with total access to the printing press and a pro-leftist house and senate that will let him use that press. I am sure he will blame the printed money on George Bush as well.

Another interesting part in the article was the date given for the end of funding, July 1st. If that holds true as a more common date across the country then the worst is about to hit.

As much as I dislike what feminism has done and made this country into I pray it won't come to a bad end. I hope God is watching and I hope HE is listening.

Obama Pre-staging press conferences with Huffington Post

2009-06-23T13:18:00.000-07:00

As if it isn't enough that Obama turned over the stimulus package to women even though 80% of the unemployed are men. That he lectures men on being better fathers while he has supported legislation and organisations which promote the marginalization of men. Now he admits to being in personal contact with left leaning media journalist.

I know this is not new. Most people have known for a while now he was doing this but this is the first outward admission of it that I have seen.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0609/Obama_calls_on_HuffPost_for_Iran_question.html

And it is to the Huffington post as well which just today has at least two articles on women's rights, glass ceilings and such.

As men we must preach the word, get the real story of how we are being treated out there.

Its our only and last hope.

Femenomics 111 - The He-cession

2009-06-22T14:13:00.000-07:00

Earlier today another blogger (thanks Mr. M) pointed out this article which kinda goes hand in hand with what I have been saying about feminism "Killing" the American economy. In this article the author points out how women's groups (Especially NOW) managed to get the stimulus spending turned into yet more Femenomics funds.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp?pg=1

I read sometime ago about men making up 80% of the unemployed who have lost their jobs during this downturn. I almost made a blog about it 2 months ago when I saw some female journalists talking about the racial percentages of women effected by this crisis and yet nothing about men. I also remember the statement last December or so by our then president elect Obama about how the stimulus was to encompass everyone "Not just white male construction workers". Now I see how his statement fits into what actually happened behind the scenes.

After NOW got ahold of the stimulus package they managed to divert almost half of it to mostly female occupation areas giving women an estimated 42% of the jobs created yet they make up only about 20% of the jobs lost. JUST WOW.

One quote from the article I really liked was

"Our incoming president did what many sensible men do when confronted by a chorus of female complaint: He changed his plan."

Just wonderful and yet the Great One himself has the nerve to attack men for not being fathers in June after he allows himself to be browbeat into hamstringing men even more a few months earlier?

Femenomics lead by women's special interest groups like NOW are killing this country. They have over spent in an effort to replace men with the government. They have allied themselves with illegal immigration to keep their numbers up for votes. They help to support voter fraud and as I still plan to show were the major contributor(s) to the recent housing bubble collapse.

Unless men as a solid group begin to demand and force change soon we wont have an economy left and that change will be thrust on us anyway.

Femenomics - 110 Insurance bias

2009-06-21T23:42:00.000-07:00

All the recent hype about health care got me curious about private to corporate rates. One reason I have stayed in my dead end warehouse job (in fact the only reason) has been health insurance for my son. Of course my pro-choice ex wife is suppose to take care of this and hasn't so it is up to me.

Anyway I figured health insurance would have to be higher for women than men, and I found out that upto age 55 it is. At age 55 men's health insurance actually becomes more expensive due to prostrate cancer. As usual I also found about a million articles of women's groups fighting this tooth and nail but also as usual only the part that women have to pay more for.

Just one link: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/state_capitol/seeking_gender_equity_in_healt.php

This article which is a little old is interesting because in it the question of car insurance being higher for males is asked. The answer was given that it was OK and didn't apply since the question isn't about 17 year olds. Of course nothing about gender and if 17 year old females had to pay more I bet it would be mentioned.

Now of course I always figured I had to pay more for my car insurance (which actually is higher for men until something like 35 I think) because women didn't have the proper organ placement to receive any form of highway head. I am sure I used that excuse many times in college to convince said bimbo that I had already paid for the blow job so she should take care of that while I drove her 50 miles to go to the nice restaurant she wanted to eat at. Besides its a good appetiser for her.

Yet it isn't just car insurance, life insurance is also higher for men than women.

I would say in this one maybe a bit of non-gender bias laws might help men out, but of course only the one women have to pay more for will be adjusted and that adjustment will also mean down for them (Hmmm I am seeing a pattern of women going down and insurance here now), and men's payments going up.

Sotomayor Update

2009-06-19T22:02:00.000-07:00

Seems the soon to be justice has resigned from the sexest women's group now that it has been made public.

About time a woman has to stop doing something she maybe enjoyed because of radical feminist views and law.

Huzzah

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_SOTOMAYOR?SITE=CACRU&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Toddlers found eating dogfood

2009-06-18T11:23:00.000-07:00

Came across this story today:

http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/stories/phoenix-news-061509-children-found_-wandering.83fa7cdf.html

There is some video with it. Apparently the 20 year old mother who is a dancer left her two children alone all night while she went to visit an ex-boyfriend.

Interesting twist is the father who did finally get his son who said he had been trying to get custody of said son for two and a half years.

Seriously there needs to be more accountabillity and cooperation enforced in divorce regardless of who pays. Without going on a long rant about it just to begin with give non-custodial parents the same rights as custodial ones and the abillity to remove their children without facing jail time automatically and alot of this crap would end.

As If we didn't already expect it.

2009-06-17T21:43:00.000-07:00

Seems Sotomayor is a member of a womens club.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SOTOMAYOR_WOMENS_GROUP?SITE=AZPHG&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

I bet not even belonging to a sexest "group" will keep this woman off of the supreme court bench.

But they allow men to speak and travel with them, wonder if they only let them speak when they are told to.

We need to pass a law so supreme court justices can be removed so we can right all this damage Obama-fem is doing.

Our Public Schools - or why I had to Home School

2009-06-16T14:03:00.000-07:00

As I approach the final few months until my son is able to legally take his GED and I no longer have to worry about the all female employees (Honestly in over 10 years I have never spoken with or met a male employee of this government agency) of social services crawling up my ass and looking over my home school records, I feel I can finally begin speaking out against the local public schools.

I should give some credit though to a woman who finally made it possible for my son to come and live with me. After three years of being a latch key child, being in constant trouble with the local schools, moved to three different school zones, and finally ending up a ward of the court, not to mention some physical abuse by my Ex's husband of the time. This woman blew off the lies thrown at me by my Ex: namely that I was a dead-beat dad and had no interest in my son's life, and managed to award me custody of my son.

Something thousands of dollars in lawyer fees was never able to do no matter how much trouble my son got into; she was able to do because she had no other options but to place him in a detention center or with me on house arrest.

Well it paid off for her as in four years my son has not been in trouble once.... Not one time mind you. His reading levels and history are well within the college level. Yes we are lagging somewhat in science and math but with the work I had to do to even achieve a C in college algebra that doesn't surprise me much. I have made arrangements for a special tutor for him in this area.
The issues were apparent to me long before I got the chance to prove my "plan" for keeping my son out of trouble.

In the first grade he was arrested, taken to the county jail and placed in a waiting room. His crime? Well he pushed a girl. Not hit a girl, not pushed a girl down, he pushed her away from him. He pushed this girl away from him as she tried to kiss him, a game all the little girls played with the boys. When I asked what room the little girl was being held in since she was guilty of sexual assault I was informed that she had done nothing wrong. As you can imagine the argument that ensued was a bit heated and I was eventually asked to leave and invited never to come back.

In the third grade my son was again arrested. This time because he had made a comment about how he was tired of always being in trouble and should kill himself. Somehow this was also twisted into him wanting to kill his entire class. The school had him arrested for assault.
Again in the discussion that followed I asked the wrong questions like when I asked his teacher if she ever felt in danger of my son which she couldn't say yes to no matter how hard she tried, or when I pointed out that perhaps the poster with the saying that "boys are weird, you should throw rocks at them." was out of line hanging in her classroom maybe added to my son's feelings of worthlessness. Again I was asked to leave and never come back.

By the fifth grade my son was labeled a complete troublemaker, one female principal even told me that she expected to see my son on the news as a mass killer in a Macdonald’s somewhere.

Luckily soon after that he was taken away from my Ex's abusive and neglectful home and placed with me and it has been smooth sailing since that time. A year of weekly meetings with his juvenile officer, checking his weekly work and taking a test now and again. After that he was removed as a ward of the court and placed fully in my custody. Interestingly enough his mother never showed to a court hearing and was eventually arrested for not paying her share of the fines.

It helps that I have a teaching certificate for secondary level education and a degree. Armed with these (which have never helped me professionally I might add) I was able to avoid a large number of inspections and take a little more freedom in how I chose to educate my son.
The anti-male sentiments and the demands to place my son on ridlin (sp?) left me with no choice but to home school. The penalty for failure which would have been immediate placement of my son in a state facility also left me with no options and also pressured me into being a bit less strict with him at first and using a more isolationist approach in regards to social interaction. In short I kept him on my farm in a work program, which was better than a state facility I think.

The road has been long and hard in time restraints however but he has passed all his pre-tests and we are looking forward to his passing the GED and getting above the age where it is a constant worry for us of being investigated. After this hurdle is passed I have promised him a year or so off then its to the local community college where he needs at least 15 credit hours to be considered a high school graduate.

The public schools failed my son horribly. In most respects everything he did would have been laughed at when I was his age yet today our schools cater to young girls and force the young boys to be constantly in trouble. I remember one morning I was at the school for a "social" thing and noticed two boys (not my son thankfully) turn two pieces of bread into handguns and start shooting at each other in play. These boys were swiftly separated and placed in corners of the large cafeteria yet no one cared as the girls brought out a cornucopia of small items from their bags and proceeded to play dress up even forcing a boy or two to join them.

I hear Feminazi's hate this ad

2009-06-14T22:34:00.000-07:00

Soooo of course I am gonna post it here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUYhcYw1ksw

Actually I emailed this link to a female friend of mine and she loved it. She even sent it to about a dozen female friends and the feedback she gave me was all great laughter.

Its funny how our society can make light of women having some serious "Street rat crazy" feelings but anything male oriented is just evil incarnate.

Oh well I still like this video since I have heard that feminist sites hate it so it just makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside :)

Femenomics - A Deeper Introduction

2009-06-11T13:16:00.000-07:00

So this idea I had about how women seem to have it easier than men for child support collection, when fines are sentenced, on wage and cost forms etc. Has gotten me looking deeper and deeper into the facts about Macro Femenomics.

Ok off the bat just to let you know I am not an economist. My degree is in American History but in a lot of ways these two areas overlap.

Recently I started researching all the various social programs especially leftist ones which cause tax payers millions, billions and more than likely soon trillions of dollars and started seeing a pattern. Most social left leaning minority group government programs were embraced, supported, and in many cases championed by feminists organizations, sometimes with crossover leaders.

Feminists organizations have backed immigration, health-care, welfare, animal rights.... well the list is endless. If you don't believe me just do an internet search or look at NOW's important issues page.

I am beginning to believe, as certain statistics are showing me, that feminism is even the root cause of the current economic crisis or at the very least the major cause for the recent housing bubble. I am planning a blog about that soon and already have a page of notes on it.

For this blog however I am throwing out here the possibillity that perhaps the almost limitless list of social programs supported by feministic groups is causing so much strain on the US government that it has been the single largest factor in our failing economy.

More in the future.....

Cougar skinning

2009-06-09T10:35:00.000-07:00

Starting about 10 years ago I noticed a fair number of divorces (all initiated by the woman) in my general social/work network which ended with the now divorced woman dating or living with a much younger man. Just from casual curiosity I kinda kept track of these relationships and added a few over the years as well.

In total I kept watch on about 12 older female-younger male relationships. The newest one was added about 3 years ago and is counted twice as that was the second younger fling for that woman. Interrestingly enough none of these older woman have begun new relationships with younger men in the last 2 years period and most all of them are single now and hitting the bars regularly.

Now of course I have very limited information on most of these women as to casual sex and perhaps getting lucky from time to time. A few I know for a fact have picked up the stray young guy and brought them home but not a one is still with the younger man they started off with.

Also about half of them I have had no information on for 5 years or more as I stopped following up on them when their "fling" ended. I also don't have accurate information on the exact age differences in each case but what I do know is that out of 12 older woman to younger men relationships not a one of them worked out for longer than 5 years.

One in particular that I witnessed up close was a woman I work with who was dating a much much younger man. She was as near as I could figure in her lower 40's while the guy was at best 20. After about 2 years I witnessed the boy sending his cougar to get him drinks while he used every opportunity of his cougars absence to flirt heavily with a banquet server at a company party. Later that night he had disappeared and was last seen walking out a back door with said server. The cougar has been looking steadily worse since then and several co-workers have gossiped about how hard she is taking her new found singleness.

Another case which happened to be an Ex-girlfriend of mine, began with her marrying an 18 year old guy when she was 36 and ended with him finally pushing her into internet porn and finally making a few movies. You can see her in one of the "watching my mom go black" and "cougars in heat" movies if your interested. They finally split up last year (after 4 years of marriage) as she is facing 3 felony charges for theft.

My point is I cannot find any hard statistics on overall older women to younger men relationships. Several articles proclaim how these relationships are on the rise, and point out the Demi Moore to boytoy thing. Yet I cannot find any real studies into how long these relationships really work.

My experiences and observations show they don't work at all and I must admit a certain satisfaction in seeing the once mighty cougars skinned and just looking old, tired, and used up now.

For the young guys I can understand their interest, Hell cougar skinning isn't anything new I can assure you of that from my own experiences of 20 or more years ago. Also judging by what I see in the younger women now adays I can see the advantages: Use the older ones while they still look good and they are just happy your so much younger and wont bitch about money and success until the younger ones get some age themselves....then dump the old ones when they are old.

Oh well none of this really effects me anymore except the certain satisfaction I get to make the occasional dig at the used up old cougar from time to time.

Femenomics 102

2009-06-07T17:06:00.001-07:00

I saw a couple of TV interviews this weekend with a reporter/writer named Katty Kay. What caught my ear off the bat was a statement she had made about how women are beginning to wake up and see there are differences between men and women and in what each sex finds important.

I was hoping that maybe here was another well spoken woman who gets it. She mentioned taking time for the kids and having kids and being a homemaker are and should be important to women today. She even said something about how women are waking up after 30 years and seeing that they have been imprisoned. So far so good then came the punch line.

It seems her opinion is that now is a good time for women to negotiate four day work weeks, or day care at work, or no overtime. Her opinion is that since employers can't reward employees with bonuses and higher pay they may make adjustments for women to stay in the workforce and still become happy mothers or whatever they wish. She went on to comment on how women have become engineers, doctors, pilots what have you and are taking up valuable spots in the world but then leave to become mothers. Her plan is that now once again women should have their cake and eat it too and be able to still take up these valuable positions while allowing these women to also fullfill their other wishes and keep that position from being filled by a man.

I should have seen this coming now the feminists are demanding better than equal treatment on the basis of gender differences not that there are none.... Guess those differences matter now if they can manage to get even more for them.

Wanna lay any bets on how this case will turn out?

2009-05-27T16:07:00.000-07:00

PHILADELPHIA – Philadelphia news outlets are reporting a suburban mother who claimed she and her 9-year-old daughter had been abducted were spotted on video surveillance at Philadelphia International Airport boarding a plane to Florida.
The Philadelphia Inquirer and WPVI-TV, citing unidentified sources, report Wednesday that 38-year-old Bonnie Sweeten, and her daughter Julia Rakoczy, were shown boarding a plane to Tampa on Tuesday afternoon.
Investigators say they can now conclude that the two were not abducted by a pair of men following a traffic accident in suburban Philadelphia.
Sweeten called 911 before 2 p.m. Tuesday in downtown Philadelphia, about 20 miles from where the she said the abduction took place.
The FBI had no immediate comment on the reports.

.
.

This woman called the police from her cell phone and stated she was being held in the trunk of a cadilac by these fictional men...twice!!!

Although slightly more dramatic then some of the stuff my ex-wife came up with to get me served with exparte papers (never came to court and were dropped but my record still shows them on there) years ago. The sentiment is still the same, women can and will make up anything to cover themselves. Of course some men will too I am sure, but men don't have laws designed to get what they want and to be taken on thier word with no burden of proof like women do.

Maybe I will be wrong but I would make a sizable bet that this will have something to do with divorce and this woman's defense will be that she was running from her husband and was scared for her life and her daughters.

Bet they don't do anything to her for the false alarm either.

Hell she could have had a 14 year old boy she was molesting in that trunk and she would get off scot free as well....

Sotomayor equals FAIL!!!!

2009-05-26T16:53:00.000-07:00

I don't know about the rest of you, but I am tired of getting passed over or not even looked at for jobs, scholarships (OK none of those in a while for me), or what have you simply because of my race and/or gender.

This has got to end now.

If a blackman can become President, and women can hold the third highest office not to mention run for Vice-President and President themselves then I think it is about time to declare equality.

If anyone reads this blog I don't care if your left or right get real and figure out the time to descriminate because of race is totally over. Yet now Obama nominates Sotomayor as his pick to the Supreme Court?

Regardless of any stance she has ever made her refusal to support the hard work of the firemen in Newhaven, both white AND hispanic proves she is after more than just equality and is a legal ACTIVIST.

Please write your Senators and let them know this appointment is one that should not be made.

More about the Current Torture Issue

2009-05-23T19:35:00.000-07:00

I cannot believe that even the most liberal non-muslim would react so and scream so loud about a bit of torture under these circumstances. The simple act of capturing someone and detaining them is torture of a sort, any type of questioning is torture if you are not allowed to stop it at will. Being held in a cell locked in is as much torture to me as being mock waterboarded.

Some of you say you would admit to anything to stop it, well thats the point if you will admit to anything you will also admit to the truth thereby giving some lead to go on.

Any man or woman who attaches themselves to an organization that would kill thousands of people by covertly infiltrating a society and turning otherwise harmless air transport into weapons should expect harsh treatment if they are captured.

You want moral high ground? Our moral high ground is that the U.S. didn't just slice off a head once the terrorist was no longer useful. We allowed detainies' religious freedom and didn't just blow up other muslims enmasse or use any limited torture on a non-violent suspect.
The Geneva convention should not even apply to these animals. They are terrorists, they blow up non-combatants as a primary target. They hide behind civilian dress, they infiltrate. By the rules of war they could be killed outright once caught, yet the U.S. even allows the Geneva convention to apply to them.

Make no mistake. From the heated sands of 8th century Middle East the Muslim faith was born in conflict, raised on conquest, forged by violent expansion, and tolerance is not even a part of its doctrine today. The only checks to this expansion in over 1400 years has been by Asian or Christian military might plain and simple. Only a direct reaction can defend the non-muslim world from this never ending jihad. I know there are peaceful muslims but the very foundations of their faith means violent groups will constantly spring from it and these groups must be met and destroyed immediatly.

I honor the articles of the United States and have defended them. Yet I also believe in an "eye for an eye" and that there are actions some beings can commit that render them below human rights. Waterboarding three mass murderers does not test my limits what-so-ever.

Hide behind your liberal morals, scream for the punishment of those who caused a little terror to a terrorist mass murderer if you want. In the end those same splinter group jihadists won't be so nice to you when they do get the upperhand after our only defense has been weakened.

More Acorn

2009-05-18T16:13:00.000-07:00

I saw these guys out in front of a grocery store back in September last year for several weeks. Didn't much like them then as I recall but I should have taken a much greater interest. I see them in the news all the time now of course and read this article today:

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/05/18/new-york-times-finally-admits

Shouldn't this kind of "Yellow Journalism" be punished. I mean its one thing to give your opinion on something like if your a right or left-wing journalist but for an entire paper to make a choice about which candidate to support and which to attack?

I certainly hope the GoP and maybe some other more conservative leaning groups plan on working against these liberal setups outside our shopping malls and grocery stores before the next elections. I know I am going to try and get something going at the same store front they set up at last year.

Perhaps a small oak tree blooming into Obama's head with the zero out sign for a slogan? Hmmmm.....

Torture? Abuse?

2009-05-13T15:01:00.000-07:00

Not that I expect anyone to care much but I guess it is time I put my opinion of the torture and abuse issue(s) in this blog.

What I find the most frightening about all this isn't that the CIA or some military personel may have used techniques that were a bit out of hand and perhaps a bit rougher than some liberal can stomach. No, I find it frightening that the Left Democrats have removed themselves so far away from a unified and balanced America where we have relied on people with the ability to do things others could not or would not do to protect all of us. In the past we understood these tactics were sometimes needed and when they were no longer needed we just let them go away and be forgotten. Yet now we have a group who has come into power and who wants to attack and possibly put on trial Americans who were protecting these same liberals in the best and fastest way they could think of.

My first point is that these very same liberals need to remember its only three and a half years to the next presidential election and one year to the start of the next congressional election. You seriously don't want to be on the other end of a witch hunt I am sure.

My second point is this: These men who were questioned were not soldiers, they were not in uniform, they are not part of any legal or world recognized country. The Geneva convention does not apply to them. They do not have any real rights while operating in civilian dress and covertly. By all established laws they could have been hung immediatly when they were found to be covert agents ie..... Terrorists. Soldiers get honorable treatment under the convention, Terrorists DO NOT and SHOULD NOT!

Lastly if these techniques are torture than I have been tortured myself for reasons from hazing to education. I have submitted to torture just to be aware of how I could be treated if captured. The closest thing I have seen mentioned to true torture would be the waterboarding and honestly with the way these agents were doing it (Yes there are many ways to waterboard) it could maybe be called torture of the very lowest level. Annoying? Certainly. Fear instilling? Yep but not really from drowning as you can still breath, but more from not being in control and knowing you really can't do anything but take it. If what they have shown is torture then simply being locked up in a cell is torture by this example.

By making an issue out of all of this the leftist liberals have almost assured a swift and (truely)tortuous death to any American soldier who is captured. By publishing these pictures and making all this public, and therefore available to terrorist groups that mean to harm Americans, the Obama administration and other Democrats currently in office are, in my opinion, commiting treason and sedition. With each hearing and each statement these "officials" set the groundwork to be a target of the next witch hunt in Washington.

Next they will get Jane Fonda back out and start giving muslim terrorist groups all over the world financial aid and have Obama assign them Tarp money.

Generalizations

2009-05-09T12:46:00.001-07:00

I have been in an active and very rewarding relationship with a woman I swear has got to be the most kind hearted, least confrontational, happy individual I have ever met.

When I first started dating her about a year ago she often told me she was bossy and bitchy. Well I don't know why she thinks that, or maybe she is just constantly keeping something inside but I just never see it. She apologizes to me about a hundred times whenever we drive somewhere since she insists that I drive but then tells me where to turn, what lane to be in, how fast to drive etc. I just giggle everytime she does this. In fact I will admit her instructions are often very useful, she is a very good co-pilot. I still refuse to stop for her to rescue wandering turtles on the road however.

She is also very liberal, yep a left leaning democrat. She also represents the rarest kind of liberal I have ever had the pleasure to meet, totally open-minded. I am sure I will mention her more in the future but I needed to introduce her as a lead in to this post.

Often in our various debates she will loudly exclaim, "I am not like that, your generalizing all women together". That is a hard statement to counter because she is right. She certainly is very different and close enough to me that I can't simply wave her statement off as fluff. Recently however I changed tactics.

If generalizing all women together is wrong, then explain to me how it is fair to lump all men together as violent criminals who attack women physically? She replies of course that she doesn't do this. I point out that in fact by supporting the current domestic crime laws and the no questions asked exparte/restraining orders she does.

Despite all the stories other men have told me of being slapped with these orders and prevented from retrieving their possessions or other items, even their check books and debit cards. I will just focus on my own experiences concerning un-warranted restraining type orders. Interestingly enough after I got custody of my son I haven't so much as called my useless pro-choice ex-wife even once yet before when it was still my job to call my son or check on his progress at school she would always resort to the "no questions asked exparte" and then never show up for the court hearing that was usually scheduled months after the police would come by my place of work to serve me.

So by law, enforced by and served by our law enforcement, I am generalized without question as being a violent stalker without a trial, and even when the accuser doesn't even show in court and the exparte is dropped there are no repercussions for her unsubstantiated accusations.
Perhaps women need to stop their support for the generalizing of men before they complain that men lump all women together these days.... Just a thought.

Here is a link I found discussing the situation: http://www.dumpyourwifenow.com/2007/08/04/are-abuse-shelters-helping-deceitful-women

Testosterone Gel?

2009-05-07T14:40:00.000-07:00

I Read this article today:

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2009/NEW02011.html

In general it warned against the bad side effects of children being exposed to this cream or gel. Some of the side effects sounded pretty bad.

So if we assume men have been dealing with these side effects since time began and that male bodies are self regulating to put such a strong hormone to use and counter its effects what happens when it goes away?

Studies have shown testosterone has been decreasing in American men steadily over the last few decades:

http://www.theindychannel.com/health/10175681/detail.html

I have my own ideas as to why of course but we wont go into that here and now.

The loss of testosterone is a dangerous thing. One way it can be lost or hampered in production is by damage to the testecles.

Because of this potential hazard I suggest the new hate laws should address this and I suggest anytime a kick in the nuts is protrayed in the media we men sue as it is suggesting a hate crime is acceptable.

Write your congressmen and suggest that protraying violence to men, especially if it shows a kick or punch to the groin region, should be named in the new hate crimes bill.

Islamic Beauty Queen

2009-05-06T15:18:00.001-07:00

So I saw this article today while browsing the news.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090506/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_saudi_miss_beautiful_morals

This got me thinking. Then I remembered the article a short while back about the Afghan women and the sex-during marriage law and how so many more Muslim women opposed the 100 or so women who were protesting against said law. Wish I could find that article again.

Anyway it got me wondering if any feminist would be supporting the Saudi beauty pageant (I seriously doubt it) although from the article so many of the qualities they were looking for were qualities I doubt even todays rabid, pro-female only, feminist supporters could condemn.

Oh well, as my mind raced on it occured to me (not for the first time) that perhaps we are seeing a pattern here. As Modern-day feminist distort and attack the religious morals of Christianity, berate and attack those women who have managed to keep some of those morals intact (Think Carrie Prejean) and continue to make sure men are pushed as far down as they can get them, we also see a decrease in Western Christianity.

Yet Islam is still on the rise....

Although I still think the rise of Western Civilization (including the US) was pushed up and carried on by the sacrifice of men who undertook those duties. Even western feminist still seem to think it is the duty of men (yet not women unless they want to), even without any equality left to todays men they are still expected to die for their country if needed and must register in case that duty is called for. This modern day corruption is not enough for me to ignore the sacrifice of the women who up held the foundation and allowed these men from history to pull all of us into the modern era.

So to those women who are left with Christian values and a sense of fairness, I salute you. For the rest well as you continue to pull Christianity down with the men you attack, just remember it's your daughters who will be wearing the burhkas down the road. As you continue to taint our public schools towards boys, make it even more difficult for young men to go to college while young women continue to increase the large percentage advantage they already have there, and thereby lower the testosterone levels of men with each generation. Remember, those men of Islam who continue to grow stronger with the support and encouragement of Islamic women will someday be knocking at our door. If islamic fundamentalism advances as fast here as it has in other areas, you may even get to wear the burhka yourself.

Femenomics 101

2009-05-04T20:54:00.000-07:00

Somewhere not so long ago I read an article about how women have a lock down on something like 70% of all the real wealth in America. I believe the article said it had something to do with men dying off like 10 years sooner than women and the widow getting all the wealth. I seem to remember the article also mentioned that a large percentage of the divorced women manage to get the retirement accounts and assets of their ATM…er I mean ex-husbands as well.

Of late however I have discovered the real reason… its called Femenomics. Femenomics became the actual rules for all law, business and finances in the U.S. sometime after the Reagan era. I am betting it was slipped through congress during Clinton’s time in office when the democrats had a majority while ol’ Bill was too busy sizing up fat chicks with tobacco products to notice, I am sure Hillary had something to do with it but I digress.

Anyway Femenomics fits nicely these days with Femonys. A Femony is a felony commited by a woman or women. The cool thing about a Femony is that the women convicted of one, or even multiple ones, gets to serve approximately one tenth of the penalty or prison time of a man who was convicted of a similar felony. In this way women can steal, assault, lie, commit fraud, murder, child abuse or whatever they like and often times get away with it for free, in some cases they can even manage to get lawyers to defend them for free just for being women. Ok so more on Femony later back to Femenomics.

You see in Femenomics women start getting alimony and/or child support the minute they file for divorce, along with everything else. In Femenomics the women continue to get this support even after they lie about their monthly expenditures, put their new three DUI getting boyfriends on their car insurance and run up 20K in credit card debt. In fact in Femenomics they get more money from the ATM….er I mean ex husbands if they do these things.

In reverse Femenomics which effect men like say me, who three years ago saved his son from the mothers second live in, cocaine dealing, alcoholic, child abuser, boyfriend, only to face kidnapping charges (dropped), assault charges (also dropped) and then thousands of dollars of legal bills to finally get custody of said son. Only then to find out that Femenomics means that for three years no one makes the female pay a friggin dime. In fact in Femenomics the woman still claims said child on her income tax and no one does a thing about it, but thats ok when they finally do she will fall under the Femony laws and more than likely the ATM....er Ex-husband will have to pay the IRS back.

Yes in Femenomics the man pays from day one, social services is there with the government hand out the minute the woman files papers. If social services cannot find the guy well the bill keeps adding up, but in Femenomics they don’t even look for the deadbeat mom…wait in Femenomics they are called pro-choice moms only men are called dead beats. Yes in Femenomics the women get free lawyers, free child support enforcement, free summons, and free support all provided by the State or Federal government free of charge. Men get to save for years to hire their own lawyer and be constantly told there is nothing social services can do for them. In Femenomics coupled with Femony law, social services claim they cannot find the pro-choice mother even when she has been convicted of Femony bank fraud and they claim the bill does not even start to accumulate until they do find dead…er pro-choice mom.

Yep Femenomics is the wave of the future fellas. Sometime down the road I will explain how Femenomics touches on education, business and home loans and government bids but I think the child support enforcement code is enough for tonight.

Men's Health

2009-05-02T10:13:00.000-07:00

So after the last oh twenty years or so of focus being completely on women's health, women's issues, women's victimization etc.etc.etc. Men finally get a bone thrown to them...maybe.

U.S. Reps Tim Murphy (R-PA) and Barron Hill (D - IND) have introduced HR 2115 "Men and family health care act of 2009"

Link : http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/04-30-2009/0005016634&EDATE=

I can only say its about time.

I guess the feminabishes have always been ok with men dying 4 to 10 years earlier than women (one reason womens real wealth in the US is like double what men have on average... more on that down the road). I am sure they are fine with the fact that more men are diagnosed with cancer than women each year, and of course suffer more from mental depression and suicide. All of that was of no concern to the feminist equality for all "as long as they are female" theme.

Even the company I work for opened up an employee health clinic that catered almost totally to female issues in testing, preventive care etc. Why shouldn't they though the U.S. Government has been spending billions more each year on women over men's health so I assume in the new world order of government run business that companies must follow suit.

Lets hope this is the beginning of a turn around and I urge you to write to your local congress-person and let them know how much you support this bill. With luck you will be writing your State Senator next!!!

2009-04-30T20:14:00.000-07:00

The Second Amendment

I guess I will start this blog with an issue that I find one of the most important aspects of modern US politics, gun control.

Yep I am totally against any form of gun control in the United States period. Military, automatic, belt fed, bayonet you name it I personally feel any form of firearm should be available for any citizen of the United States to own legally as long as they have not been convicted of a violent felony.

I am sure if you are an anti-gun proponent I will never change your mind and I am also sure if you are one of the "hunting rifle" only sort of gun supporters you will never see the need for anyone to own a firearm that looks military in anyway. Perhaps someday you will get your wish and legislation will be passed limiting a citizen’s access to "certain types" of firearms for starters. When and if that happens I can only smile and imagine the can of worms you will be opening, not only with the protestors but with the other rights that will be "re-evaluated" after the second is butchered. Freedom of speech but only if no one complains (ok wait we already have that one), lets see ok I got it, when you have the troops taking over your home for a few nights with their government issue assault rifles cause after the second amendment the government went after the third etc. etc.

Its no secret old world governments limited ownership of weapons. They also allowed them as with "The English Bill of Rights of 1689" Which granted all protestants the right to arms for self defense. Many believe this was the fore runner of the American Bill of Rights but whatever the case maybe the granting of rights and the taking away of rights to arms and weapons has been done for centuries.

What is curious is that the more totalitarian or unpopular a government is the more they wish to restrict weapon ownership even unto the time of the revolution when British troops attempted to disarm local militias and were met with resistance which also prompted writers like Blackstone to insist on the right to own arms and even John Adams to refer to that right when he defended the British soldiers after the Boston Massacre. Our founding fathers wanted every able bodied male to own a firearm suitable for self and community defense.

So before I go any further into a history lesson of colonial America the point is that even at that time there were hunting weapons and those suitable for military use yet no distinction was made on which could be privately owned and which could not.

For the past 150 years we in the United States have been lucky enough to not need to have every home contain a weapon suitable for military use but that can change very quickly and unexpectedly. The United States has not needed to call on a general levy of all able bodied men from an any given area for generations, but if we should ever need to I would feel much better if those who turned out did so with somewhat modern firearms.

I also find it entertaining that the U.S. Homeland security can post guidelines for keeping food and other items for emergencies and not list firearms or at least not that I could find a reference to. I live in a rural area and myself and my neighbors have had run ins with feral dogs on several occasions over the years attacking livestock, pets, and even entering houses. I can tell you assault type weapons are the firearms of choice in those circumstances, take my word for it. Do you think feral dogs wont be an issue in a sustained type of emergency situation? In a lot of major cities they are already very dangerous just do a search on feral dogs and read for yourself. Also in rural areas you have feral pigs and other colony type animals which may need firearms to control. Military type arms are usually the best type for work of this nature.

Military weapons are never going to go away. They will always be available either legally or illegally those who use them to commit violent crimes don’t care how they get them but making it impossible for law abiding citizens to own or purchase them will only come back to bite us in the ass somewhere down the line. The danger of not having them available when the need arises far outweighs the danger of a few crazy people, who usually had them illegally to begin with.