Maybe this is the beginning of changes

The fight of the Newhaven firefighters was one that I followed pretty closely.

Honestly if the supeme court had ruled in favor of the city of Newhaven my loyalty to the government of this country would have ended. Oh I would have followed all the laws and paid my taxes of course but if the supreme court had not ruled against this discrimination of whites and a hispanic (I have read there were 2 hispanics in some articles) then that would have been the end of my oath as it touches onto the current government of the United States.

Heres an article of the ruling: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_FIREFIGHTERS_LAWSUIT?SITE=TXMCA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Of course four of the judges still went the wrong way which in my mind makes this entirely too close a call for something this important. How ANY judge can rule against these men or fail to see the discrimination here is beyond me. We have a half African President, Women in the other highest offices, a black man in charge of the GoP, the list is endless. There is no further need for these laws favoring minorities and in fact all they do is discriminate against whites forcing them to pay for "crimes" they had no part in. In fact my mostly Irish decent means my family suffered from discrimination almost as bad or worse depending on where they were at the time in America. Yet despite that I had several ancestors who offered up their lives to right the wrongs against minorities and in my own way I have sacrificed for this dream as well and it is about time we are all treated equal.

For the judges who ruled against this travisty I salute you and you have restored at least some of my faith in at least one branch of our government.

The Name Game

If justice finally caught upto my ex-wife it was slow in coming. As you know I like to relate my direct stories from time to time to back up some of the articles and other blogs I read. My Ex who had a warrant out for her arrest for over a year not to mention the child support people saying they "couldn't find her" for over 3 years finally got some retaliation thrown her way.

Earlier this month ex-wife hoe was sentenced to 6 months home detention, five years supervision and ordered to pay $40,000.00 restitution to a former employer.

I guess this means child support and the court officials will know where to find her now for the other summons they have for her. Not to mention she filed for divorce from husband number four this past week.

The only good information I have ever gotten from my lawyer in over 3 years lol.

So more to the title. The reason I was given for the lack of any forward momentum in tracking my Ex down for three years was that she had moved repeatedly (6 times in 3 years). Had changed jobs over and over (I have no clue how many have'nt cared to talk to her in over 4 years myself). Yet most importantly she would change names like a chameleon on a patchwork quilt.

Seriously the courts need to find a way to keep track of these women who change their last names faster than they can practice serial monogamy. As far as I know only felonies have SSNs attached to them. Of course as I posted sometime ago women get femony convictions so I am sure the rules are different.

Anyway wish me luck looks like my long wait for this is finally coming to an end. What truely scares me is that even with her long list of infractions the deck might still be stacked against me in the pro-female courts.

Have a good weekend all!!!!

Real Housewife hides behind her children

I have heard about these shows but never felt like punishing myself enough to watch one. Ok so I also don't understand how this woman can be a "real housewife" if she is dating around but who knows what the feminist porn television has become these days.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_REAL_HOUSEWIVES_SEX_TAPE?SITE=PAYOK&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Apparently this woman screws some guy for a few months then dumps him. Nothing unusual there with these women I guess but this guy has secret video tapes and photos of her in the "act". It leaks out through some interview the rejected guy gives and so she takes him to court over it.

No reason for me to care or even take notice until......

Outside court, Staub said Zalewski was trying to get back at her and her two daughters, ages 11 and 15, for her breaking up with him

and

This is about my kids," Staub said. "I'm a big girl. Do what you want to me. But you broke bread with my children. Don't do this to me. No adult should ever do this to a child."

How the hell does a jilted man giving out pictures of this woman have anything to do with her kids? I mean without throwing out some theories that would put me in the same catagory as David Letterman I can't see this as an attack on these children. I would say that at the worst he is just not thinking about them at all.

But thats what women like this have always done, they grab their meal ticket/pay check and try and bring more sympathy for themselves with their children.

Femenomics 220 - The Housing Crisis

I spent the last couple of weeks researching a theory of mine about the latest housing bubble burst and the current U.S. economy. What I found didn't really surprise me. The relationships between liberal pro-female legislation concerning lending and home buying and mandatory child support laws gave women an edge in the home lending arena.

This article lists some of this legislation and it's effect on banks and lending : http://orient.bowdoin.edu/orient/article.php?date=2008-10-24&section=2&id=3

In 1987 single women made up about 10% of home purchases. By 1997 that figure had jumped to 18%. By 2003 it had jumped to 22%. Men stayed flat over this time at about 9%. Yet other studies show that women make up a higher percentage of sub-prime and A rated loans compared to men in the same income bracket. What the sub-prime study didn't show was the overall credit score relation or the amount of income from child support or government support in each income bracket. Sadly I cannot find any figures on percentages of those numbers in overall income.

Also in the late 90's child care was removed as a living expense in home loan acceptance.

More recent figures showed Fannie Mae as estimating single female home ownership to increase to 28% by the end of 2009, yet one report from the Realty Times reported 40% of all home buyers being women in 2007 again while single male home buyers percentages remained flat or even reduced in numbers. Single women also became the largest group of buyer in condo sales (47%) during this time.

My research leaves alot of holes and unanswered questions. Studies show that more women than men took sub-prime loans. Sub-prime loans are the most widely blamed cause for the housing bubble yet without figures for how much income was reported from child support, alimony or government support I cannot prove any hard facts. I also was unable to find any statistics related to gender and recent foreclosures. I am assuming that will take a few years to show itself.

What is interesting is that if you take what I believe is the average years child support would be paid, roughly 7 to 9 years, and add that to the beginning of the single female housing boom numbers after the loan legislation became law and took effect you get to about 2007. Just the time period economist started seeing a real problem develop with sub-prime loans. How much effect the He-cession and men finding themselves unable to pay support has had remains unclear.

The only true relationship that can be made at this time is that single women make up the largest portion of home loans by gender, although they still MAY, and that is a not confirmed since 2005, be the second largest overall behind married couples. If they haven't caught up to married couples they are right behind them thats for sure. Single women home buyers also make up the highest number of sub-prime and A rated loans and it is these loans which caused the housing bubble.

I think the final conclusion is obvious but I will leave that upto you to make until the overall figures on foreclosures become available.

One final factor which I became aware of was the accusations that women were "saddled" with sub-prime loans more often than men. Again I could find no mention of credit scores in the overall findings of who was offered what type of loan only overall income levels. One quote I found pertinent was:

A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study found that mortgage
borrowers that lack financial information and those that are reluctant to negotiate
aggressively are more likely to receive higher cost mortgage loans

I find it difficult to believe that women are being discriminated against in home loans with the current government regulations on such things. My take is still on the overall credit scores.

In the end we will have to see how the final figures come out but I am putting my money on a much higher ratio of loan defaults by women compared to men.

Hate Crimes Bill

Ya know I really don't have a problem with gay men. In fact with the way American women act these days I would be gay if I could choose it. That sort of lends some credit to the gay statement that gays are kinda hard wired (Pun intended) to be gay and there is nothing they can do about it. Well I am wired to be so not gay it isn't even funny. Still to each his own and I at least envy them the fact that female sexuality has no influence on them.

As for gay marriage well I think the term marriage is a judeo-christian term and since being gay kinda is against those religions then maybe gay men and women should found their own religion and name their unions something besides marriage, but I digress.

My problem is with this hate crime bill. Why do minorities or those who try and say they are minorities like women need this bill? Violence is illegal regardless, every person is protected by the state regardless of any race, gender, creed, sexual orientation etc. (OK except white men).

Basically it is saying any of these minorities can attack a white man and it isn't a hate crime but if anyone attacks a minority it is. How is that fair?

Anyway here is an article from a pro-gay source about it. Funny it is championed by AG Holder the same guy who dropped all the charges against the b;ack panther voteing station terrorists earlier this year.

http://advocate.com/news_detail_ektid93360.asp

I would suggest we write our congressmen and senators and tell them how racists/sexist/whathaveyou this bill is.

Another Affair

Just great this along with the other senator from Arizona or where ever is just gonna give the feminist groups a hay day.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SC_GOVERNOR_WHERE?SITE=KFWB&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

If he kept it secret for a year or more and his wife knew and didn't throw a fit, why not just let it go till he was out of office.

At least he didn't go for an American woman so he has some brains.

Not enough bake sales

"Not enough bake sales to keep us in business" was the quote at the end of this article from Reutgers on the closing of a womens shelter near Chicago.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55N2NM20090624?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=11569

All I can say is its about time.

As feminism has pushed the U.S. government to fund these centers and shelters for women only, has pushed and received legislation that further lined the common female's pocket not only at the ex-husband's expense but at a cost to tax payers as a whole. And finally while backing every other social or animal rights legislation or special interest group in a cooperative action to lend more weight to their own moves, this country has run out of money.

The article also mentions how children are being placed with relatives now other than government run facilities, without the tests and what have you. To this I also say it's about time. This is how it should be, people should take care of their own.

I don't really know how this is going to turn out in the end. I am not some fall of civilization nut although I have always been happiest away from the city and have planted my 40 acres to be able to help keep my son and I alive if things fall apart.

I can tell you in the last few months the number of "stray" animals on my little hobby farm has grown higher than I have seen it in 20 years. One huge spotted lab cross dog has already moved into my house and lays at my feet as I write this. I have learned over the years that it is a good indication of bad times and this is the worse I have seen it since the middle 1980's and maybe worse than it was then. This animal was not some random born in the wild stray either he is well behaved and has lived inside a house before. The number of stray cats I see slinking around my barn has doubled in the last two months as well. Luckily the dog is male I am thinking about only sheltering males now.

As more and more men suffer job losses and are jailed because they cannot pay the crippling support to greedy ex-wives and as more and more money is sent where it isn't needed to fund more sexest womens "concerns" this will just get worse.

Sadly the most dangerous aspect of this is not the women's groups. Its the fact that it happens while we have a mangina president with total access to the printing press and a pro-leftist house and senate that will let him use that press. I am sure he will blame the printed money on George Bush as well.

Another interesting part in the article was the date given for the end of funding, July 1st. If that holds true as a more common date across the country then the worst is about to hit.

As much as I dislike what feminism has done and made this country into I pray it won't come to a bad end. I hope God is watching and I hope HE is listening.