Sunday, July 12, 2009

Constitutional Rights for a Terrorist?

Taking a slight break from posting about the evils of feminism today.
I read this article earlier:
This article insults the American people and the Constitution on so many levels it boggles the mind. To even mention a hero like George Washington in the same article as that racist Holder is just a start.
To liken islamic terrorists to being treated like uniformed British Soldiers from the age of reason (An age we certainly are not in any longer) is just total insanity. To imply that these very same terrorists should have the luxury of the Constitution which they attack is madness I cannot even fathom. Like something as evil as terrorism could even have been thought of by the founding fathers.
To allow an Attorney General of the United States to stay in office after he shows blatant racism and scoffs at the Constitution by allowing CONVICTED poll disrupters to walk free because of their race and membership in a racial hate group is craziness so complete it can only come from radical left-wing backing.
That these same leftists can talk about upholding the Constitution that they violate in everyway with their hate crimes legislation, gun controls, federal control, special rights for women, quotas etc is just down right insulting.
I wasn't a huge supporter of the Bush/Cheney administration, but if any part of the U.S. government goes after a past President or administration member over the "rights" of a terrorist then I know who I will be defending.

No comments:

Post a Comment