Thursday, September 24, 2009

First DV clinic founder says "I loathe feminism"

ERIN PIZZEY set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 - and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence. But what she has never made public before is that her own childhood was scarred by the shocking cruelty of both her parents.

There isn't really a lot I can add to this article actually.

Mrs. Pizzey has some very pointed and accurate comments on feminism and the loss of the family and man bashing along with some very good quotes from the article which I will post.

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish, would result in the complete destruction of family life.

Re-freshing to see a leader in the DV movement say such a thing.

Many years later, when feminists started demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.


I was, on reflection, following my mother's unspoken orders. Remarkably, she had manipulated me to such a degree that I was now willing to murder for her.

I would encourage everyone to read this article and also browse the comments sections at the bottom.

The beast called feminism has gone so far that even a respected founder's opinion seems to have no impact on the women who will defend their privileged new social class.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

LOL Women love a nice guy with a little thug in them

What a piece of steaming feminist crap this article from the Examiner is:

Now I won't knock the Examiner they have some pretty good articles from time to time and haven't seemed to far feminist leaning in the past, but what kind of horse shit is this:

All women have a little bad girl inside that would, with the right motivation and encouragement, love to break free. A woman needs a man who can complement that side of her.
And no, the opposite of a "too nice" guy does not have to be a straight thug. It's frustrating that nice guys tend to see the world in such black and white, polar opposite ways. In reality, there is a whole range of men in between the two extremes… in the gray area.

So get this right gentlemen your suppose to read the little slut's mind now and know what she wants at that particular moment.

It doesn't matter that she has the job you were more qualified for, or that she can have you arrested with a little story and a fake tear. No. Your suppose to overcome all this and light her spark by being confident and walking the edge.

Well Bitch I got an edge for ya and I hope you fall off.

Women want a versatile, confident and secure man that can handle himself on the basketball court, in the boardroom and in the bedroom. Women love a mature man, appreciative of family, respectful of women, children, people, and life. Women want a guy with intelligence and education, balanced with common sense and street smarts.

I hope this woman will be satisfied with a few of those points missing since their beloved feminism is keeping men out of the boardroom, the Universities and off the basketball court to pay their child support.

I think it is fitting that women cannot even see they are making what they claim to want an endangered creature. Of course what they claim to want today is never the same as what it will be tomorrow anyway.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Women's Happiness?

The recent study and paper by Stevenson and Wolfer, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness"? Has been covered on a few men's rights blogs of late. Since I have started back to my 50+ hour work weeks I have had little time to do more than get home and take care of dinner and housework but I have kept up my reading as much as possible.

I came across this article on the paper at the Huffington Post:

An interesting article. I found it more interesting as someone who follows Men's rights closely because I feel we men from these sites know the answer that Marcus Buckingham attempts to lead his female readers to kicking and screaming.

The answer? Well to put it in it's most basic form one has only to say feminism. Yet this answer which speaks volumes to the men who have been on the paying side of feminism has no meaning to the modern liberated woman.

In his article Mr. Buckingham brings forth some facts men have known for years yet never seem to get published or any attention in the main stream media. Namely: Women working less hours, women getting equal pay and finally even out-stripping men in wages, women dominating education, and women outnumbering men in middle and upper management and now the fact that more women have retained jobs than men.

I was seriously surprised to see these facts mentioned on anything published by Huffington Post.

But there is more.

All told, more than 1.3 million men and women have been surveyed over the last 40 years, both here in the U.S. and in developed countries around the world. Wherever researchers have been able to collect reliable data on happiness, the finding is always the same: greater educational, political, and employment opportunities have corresponded to decreases in life happiness for women, as compared to men.

The study clearly shows that young women start off much happier than men of the same age but by age 39 the scales cross and men become much happier than women.

These findings typically follow what I have noticed about women and the danger age of the mid to upper 30's I have spoken about before. It is as if as their happiness levels decrease anything can be used or done to try and stop this downward spiral. Anything that is, as long as it is self centered and hostile towards men, it seems.

The article also brings to light that women and men spend about the same amounts of time doing housework.

It falls because when it comes to the sharing of 'home' duties, the trend lines are all moving in the direction you would predict would lead to greater happiness and less stress for women: namely toward greater parity. For example, between 1975 and today women's housework hours declined from twenty-one per week to seventeen, while men's jumped from six to thirteen.

As Mr. Buckingham states there is no reason in fact for women's happiness to fall. They have it all. The article doesn't mention legal matters but we know we can add those to the mix as well.

In all aspects of modern Western life women hold all the cards, yet they are still unhappy as they age.

We men know why. As the 40's close in on these women even the sexiest woman starts to wear. No matter how much money is sunk into plastic or botox. No matter how many hours are spent on the treadmill or how many calories are counted the most a woman who hits 40 can do is give herself a few brief years of playing cougar before nothing works anymore.

By 40 most women today have destroyed the man they had the most history with. The companion that would have helped raise their children. She has wiped out his money, betrayed him. More than likely lied about him and made at least some form of false domestic violence claim during the divorce she initiated. She then lived well off the child support she justified as in the "best interest of the child" that is her new car and the biggest house she can afford with the money while the college fund is empty waiting for the Ex to shell out even more money.

Sure it is easy for women to find a new sexual partner again and again at least till the dreaded 40s arrive.

Yet in the end what has feminism done for these women?

It has left them totally alone and taken away the traditional wealth women had for centuries in the family and with a husband who had been with them through it all.

Feminism destroyed everything that gave an older woman meaning and importance so that now a woman past 40 is just alone.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Feminism actually promotes violence against women?

At least that was one theory I walked away with after reading this article:

A fair bit of warning the article, although sound from a male point of view in many ways, is loooooong.. So take a drink when ya read it.

I walked away from this article with several thoughts running through my head and there were so many relevant quotes that I finally gave up on trying to remember most of them.

The author talks about how wave two feminism brought in certain values and how women wished to change men but since men are unchangeable it lead to wave three along with the death of chivalry and several other consequences leading to what we have now which is outright war.

Because most women today are feminist-minded if not actual raging feminists, virtually any woman you run into and with whom you actually manage to communicate, especially if they’re single, young or old, will be affected and influenced by the war feminists have been waging against males for decades

This statement is true and I would add to it that even women who seem to go against the mold or deny being a feminist will still visibly get their hackles up and their panties in a wad when you make a blanket statement about disliking feminist. Which just supports the quote anyway.

Moreover, now that men know that feminist-minded women, which are the majority of all women, have declared war on men seeking their obsolescence, how much less do you suppose men will now honor or respect females? How much less will they treat women kindly as friends? If we’re at war, then there can be no kindness, respect, or friendship between the two adversaries involved in combat.

The author goes on to explain that in killing chivalry the feminist opened themselves up to violence and swept away the underlying respect men had for women. Also dressing as men and acting as men contributed to this as well. Something I am sure we are all aware of here.

There is much much more to this article and the text is small but in the end the author basically states that men will not be changed and just like during prohibition will "find a way" to act like men even if they have to break the law to do so.

At heart I think this is also correct but I think the author fails to see a few more dangerous aspects of feminism especially on American and Western society. The end of male dominance as feminist call the history of the West is basically ending what kept these countries strong and defended them. This includes weakening the white race since as a race those of Western European ancestry are the only ones suffering a division because of feminism by and large.

Chivalry which is what protected these women before feminism was completely a European institution so this may explain why feminism is not catching on in other cultures or of it does it will be radically different than what we have seen in the West.

The real question is not whether feminism will win in the end because it cannot win. Feminism can only survive inside in environment created by Western European men which is a biosphere it is killing. Yet maybe it can bring down that biosphere and for those of us who have been handed the current remains of the male portion of that "biosphere" culture, either feminist domination or racial replacement equals the end regardless.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

It's all our fault guys

Well according to this author anyway.

You see the current recession was caused totally by men, and of course as we have seen in hundreds of main stream media outlets that creates the call to get more women into the financial sector.

And when the economy comes crumbling down, crashing under the weight of the imploding financial sector ... that’s right – I blame men.

Had women been holding the reins of the financial sector, rather than men, would we find ourselves in the current predicament?

Ahhhh hey.... you.... Feminist bitch... women do hold the reins for all the money spent on useless welfare and financially crippling legislation.

I could tear this fluff headed entitlement princess' article to shreds but happily there is no need.

All you have to do is read the few comments a no talent feminist hack like her generates to get all the debunking you could ever want.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

The first round of lies is out

Just as I predicted (ok I admit it didn't take a huge brain or anything but damn let me flex some)

The first round of the up-coming Obama bait and switch economy lies have started.

1. Major media Obamaphile sources will start proclaiming the He-cession is ending and the economy is on the rise.

"Domestic demand has picked up now that we have shifted from recession to recovery," Bernard Baumohl, chief economist for the Global Outlook Group, said in a note to clients.

2. The obama-nation will start wildly claiming massive job creation and/or saved jobs.

Because the economy declined less than expected in recent months, the White House said that translated to about one million jobs that would have been lost without government efforts. The report attributes much of this to the stimulus but conceded it is difficult to say for certain which of the many government economic policies contributed to the estimate.

Hmmmm 1 million jobs huh? But the stimulus wasn't for white male construction workers who are the ones mostly out of work. So who did it go to?

Well I haven't seen any new jobs but I am betting there are more than a few teachers and bored government workers tired of doing their nails that are thankful for the stimulus.

Next step is passing of a health care bill which includes abortion coverage, minority preference for treatment, elective and non-emergency care and coverage for illegals (unless they are all made legal which is just as likely) and reduced availability of health care for seniors. Also either a public option or a trick that will eventually lead to one.

I believe the countdown has started but we shall see.

450 days more or less.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

1200 calls a month to a local DV shelter?

So it is time again for the annual United way donation drive. As I have stated before one event the company I work for does is to take donations to make the few remaining male supervisors and managers wear "traditional" female dress for the day. They then parade the men in drag around to be hooted and leered at by the mostly female employees. Its pretty sad and not something the males appear to really enjoy (at least not many of them).

Every year I am offended by this event and try and hide my disdain since I need the insurance the company offers I have stayed silent on the matter.

However this year the local media celebrity/spokesman gave a speech promoting the over all fund campaign and also made the comment that the local DV shelter, which is a possible recipient of the donated money, had reported that they receive upto 1200 calls a month. He didn't say they took 1200 domestic violence calls just that they took 1200 calls. Hell it could have been 600 wrong number calls for pizza delivery but the implied message is of course that they took 1200 calls of domestic violence against women. Also 1200 calls a month would be about 5% of the local population calling in if I am not mistaken.

This statement along with the added frustration of the "drag queen march" is seriously pushing me to write a letter to the plants general manager and the local director for the United Way to explain why I find these things so offensive and will not be donating any money.

I know the United way has done some other sexist events in other cities like the "average man dating thing" which includes astronauts and nas-car drivers as everyday sort of men.

I am seriously teetering here back and forth. The money isn't that important as I could get a job easily making the same amount of money its the insurance that would bite. Also the state I live in is a right to work state which simply means a right to be fired for no reason and we don't care state.

Not sure yet what I am going to do. Suggestions and advice are much appreciated and I will let everyone know how it turns out.

I just think it is time to take a stand on such things. I am sick of the double standards.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Obama losing white female support fast

Read this article from the LA times this morning:,0,2784900,print.story

According to recent polls Obama has lost the overall white vote in big numbers since April. The elderly and the white female vote most of all.

Among white Democrats, Obama’s job approval rating has dropped 11 points since his 100-days mark in April, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. It has dropped by 9 points among white independents and whites over 50, and by 12 points among white women -- all groups that will be targeted by both parties in next year's midterm elections.

This seems to lend some support to my earlier claim from yesterdays post that perhaps women or more specifically white middle class women are also becoming dis-satisfied with the political wing of the feminist movement.

My opinion has always been that by and large Obama's white support came from the white female vote and that women's special interest groups were the ones who gathered this support for him.

"While Obama has a lock on African Americans, his support among white voters seems to be almost in a free fall," said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse.

As I posted earlier now maybe the time to actively try and gain more sympathy from white middle class females for men's rights issues.

I know so many of them comment that they are not like that, yet still take advantage of every biased law and legislation passed for them when it is useful.

But a guy can still hope can't he?

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Is this a sign of a new tide?

Recently I got involved in a discussion on rape in European countries and how the men of those countries do not seem to want to defend the native women who are the victims of said rape by mostly Muslim men.

Of course my call was that just like in America the native white men had been brow beaten and mis-used by feminism for so long now that they no longer cared. As this discussion grew at least one woman defended feminism but mentioning that the political arm of the movement...

"No longer represented or cared about white middle class women in America"

This statement made me wonder if this is a growing feeling among women and more importantly white women.

Unfortunately feminism has become so attached to affirmative action, illegal immigration, quotas and other areas that race and feminism cannot be separated anymore. Any gains feminism makes has always and will always be at the expense of white men and therefore must at some point begin hurting white women as well.

By the end of the discussion I think maybe the woman, who was very race positive, began to see just how feminism was not only hurting her but all men close to her and by and large bringing an entire race down.

Lately I have begun to notice more conservative and Male friendly women taking the spot light. Is this a sign? Could this also be a reason for the large following women like Sara Palin and Michelle Bauman seem to be getting?

Maybe it is time we as men start reaching out more to women in general and find others that are starting to see what devastation the feminist movement has wrought.

Saturday, September 5, 2009

This Answers where one Boy Went

For two years the mother and grandmother of this boy now age 7 kept him hidden in the grandmother's house. And the state couldn't find him there?

Why or, I guess I should ask how, do women manage to pass off the fact that they use every underhanded trick they can? How is it men and institutions in this country never want to believe all the false rape nor admit that these women simply use the children as tools and promote isolation from the fathers.

Luckily we are making some progress and these matters are being looked into more but so many still go unpunished and these women know they will just get a slap on the wrist so why not do it.

Of course after finally being caught red handed and openly abusing this child by isolation (ok thats kinda an oxymoron) the mother draws her last card and accuses the father of abuse as well.

What selfish, sociopaths women have become.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Where have all the young men gone?

Labor day weekend is such a drag for me. It spells the end of my annual freedom from work and yet another 9 to 10 months of mind numbing boredom as I go back to my lift and production line.

Since I continue to get paid for my annual Summer lay off I look forward to it and I spend each Summer getting pet projects finished. This Summer I built a new trailer for wood cutting, added on a huge amount to my garden and started a bee colony. OK pretty boring stuff unless your a hillbilly like me I guess.

One thing I always love about my projects is browsing hardware stores and small shops looking for just the right part or something that I can use. This year was no different in that respect but as I visited several stores and shops I did notice something missing..... Young Men.

Where are they all? Certainly there can't be that many young men overseas in the military. The local gas stations which used to be at least half or more staffed by younger men are now all female. Lowes was almost totally women with a few middle aged men working there. It was the same everywhere I looked.

Now that I think back on it I haven't seen a young male filter through the continuous flow of turn over within my own factory in well over a year.

Where are they?

I still see some after the local high school lets out but they seem to disappear after graduation and then show up again after they turn 35.

I haven't read any articles nor has an Internet search turned up any information. Maybe I am just not seeing them or maybe they leave my local area for lack of prospects. I just don't know.

Certainly I hope this isn't a trend.

Femenomics - The estrogen recession

Thanks to Elusive Wapiti for the heads up on this article from Steve Sailer.
I love it when I find a professional writer who mirrors some writing of my own and this article validates my blog post from June 26th.
Women dominated the housing boom and with the help of bogus legislation managed to get very biased legislation for easier loans. Yet feminist tend to try and blame the male "dominated" banking and finance industries and use this as yet another call to replace men with women.
Should women qua women be criticized for helping get us into the mortgage mess?
Of course they should.
Women should be reminded, frequently, that each one of them needs to be on guard against her sex’s tendency to overspend on homes
His article is one of the best I have read in a while I would recommend all males and especially white males to read it.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Femenomics - Short term lies to come

I read an AP article this morning on Joe (ManginaExtreme) Biden and the stimulus package.
All I can say about Biden is that in my estimation since the death of "Teddy" ol' Joe gets my vote for the greatest gender traitor and Man-enemy number one.
His quote:
"The recovery act has played a significant role in changing the trajectory of our economy, and changing the conversation in this country," Biden said. "Instead of talking about the beginning of a depression, we are talking about the end of a recession."
He goes on to give yet another bogus number of some 750,000 jobs saved since the stimulus package was passed overall.

This fits in with my coming prediction for the Winter of 2009 -2010.

The Progressives in power will lie and manipulate the numbers to support their cause on health care and the stimulus. We are going to see a huge media blitz this fall on how the recession is fading. Will the stock market buy into this? I cannot tell right now but as people run out of benefits for un-employment those numbers will be brandished to show un-employment is dropping when in fact it will still be rising. They have already used this tactic in prior months. Consumer spending is tricky but in fact will rise slightly for the next few months due to students returning to school and individual educational spending that although government funded counts as consumer spending.
Any jobs claimed to be "saved" or created by the stimulus bill will be in education, infra-structure and public funded "charity" programs like DV shelters etc. Just as women's special interest groups planned, this will in fact shore up the bulk of female dominated areas for the Winter and into 2010 but it will not ease the un-employment of the group hardest hit by the He-cession and will not bring in more tax revenues for 2009.

This is Femenomics at it highest macro level. The one hope it has is that female consumer spending and the female dominated housing sales will again lift construction and manufacturing. It won't.

Instead of spending money at the base which has supported female dominated institutions and the female consumer economy they elected to replace the base that creates the wealth with a pool that can only run dry and then start spending out of this pool at such a rate that it will not last. To further damage any chance of a recovery what portion of the stimulus that is going to construction type areas is earmarked Green jobs which is just another way of saying is going to create jobs for minorities.

As I predict look for alot of media reporting from NBC, CBS, ABC, and the left leaning newspapers/web sites on how the American economy is improving. Using these headlines the dems will pass the healthcare bill they want and more than likely the Cap and Trade bill through the Senate. They are already making announcements on how the town hall meetings showed more support for health care reform than against it.

Early next year we will again hit a major tax budget problem and by election time the census manipulation will void out any anger voting by the American majority.
Fall of 2010 will be the true boiling point. People understand there isn't much they can do now but once they see that they can still do nothing in 2010 which direction will they go?

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

What is up with female pets?

So my girl friend is an animal nut. She volunteers constantly at the local animal shelter and takes in "rescue" animals alot. Despite spending unthinkable amounts of money on vet bills and such she just can't help herself.

Recently a litter of feral kittens appeared in her garden shed. Luckily the mother cat moved all the kittens but for some reason left one behind. This little gray ball of hissing, spitting terror was pulled out of the garden shed and placed in a kennel cage.

So now the work begins. For instance: The kitten must be a certain weight to be put up for adoption, if it is too small the animal shelter will euthanize it (OK I didn't know this). The kitten must also be tamed, said shelter will not take feral animals and ones who spit and hiss are not adopted (OK makes sense to me). I named the kitten Helga. Why? Well because the first stage of "taming" the feral kitten is to keep it isolated and visit it with food and stuff slowly working your way up to letting it out to play some.
In short the Helsinki syndrome.
Well I must admit she has made stunning progress with this kitten and now it is simply a cute little ball of fur that LIVES to be played with and petted and is in her words "Ready for a home". This after yet another vet bill. The difference in just two weeks is just amazing I never thought that kitten was ever gonna be more than a little Tasmanian devil.
The final step in her Helsinki indoctrination program has been to introduce the kitten to other pets. OK she has a large a number of rescued pets I am not even going into how many but this is when I noticed the most curious thing in the whole process.

All female pets are mean... Not just stand offish but down right mean. This kitten can not get close to another female animal without being slapped or growled at. Yet the male pets are already treating the kitten as a valued companion.

There has to be something here. It is too much coincidence to ignore even the very friendly female border collie wants nothing to do with Helga but the male dog and cat are Helga's constant playthings. The males are downright protective of the kitten yet the females want to kill it when no one is looking.
Is this common in domesticated or wild animals? I have heard of animals adopting other animals but that has always been a female animal thing. It just seems to me that there must be some study out there about this if male animals are more protective than female ones.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Is this the lag indicator for women?

As the school year begins the full amount of budget cuts will now hit home for female dominated segments of the American workforce. Yes we have already seen cuts and protests against government shut downs (another female dominated part of our workforce). Yet most of the big money cuts in the States which were really in the red were made in prisons and education.

Here is an article about Georgia's educational cuts:

California's cuts were worse than Georgia's and other states are following. Of course unlike the private sector cuts to construction (you remember the segment of the economy that Obama refuses to give stimulus money to) these mostly female dominated (mostly is an understatement) and tax payer funded institutions will not be laid off, just given some leave without pay.
I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest the start of this school year is the actual beginnings of real change in American society. Until now the female portion of the U.S. has not really been hit with the full ramifications of this He-cession but now this will begin to set in.

Once government and education start feeling the pinch of real money hits it's all down hill. This recession cannot begin to be over until industry and jobs pick up. Most government economist like to say un-employment is a lagging indicator but that has only been a rule with past recessions. What we are seeing today is a recession unlike anything ever seen before. A recession that started because the backs of the real working class of society could no longer support the service only entitlement of feminism.
The final straw which sealed our fate to this economic mess was the outright "theft" by feminist special interest groups of the money which may have pulled us out of the downward spiral we are in.

The question is which way will the change go?

Will Obama cave to the feminist and other progressives and continue printing money to pander to their special interest spending or will it all collapse under it's own weight? Will American society see the danger and rid the president of his house majority? Even if we manage to put the brakes on this spending we still risk massive inflation within the next two years.
Either direction we go I have hopes that now is the time when women will wake up and see what feminism has produced. The smart ones have already seen it but now we may see a more widespread acknowledgement of it.

Monday, August 31, 2009

More on the Runaway Christian Convert

More news on the case of Rifqa Bary, the 17 year old girl from Ohio who converted to Christianity from Islam and then ran to an on-line Christian pastor's home in Florida.
It turns out now she is claiming that the mosque that her parents belong to in Ohio has been stirring up dissent and has ties with Hamas.
Rifqa Bary, 17, said in a sworn statement her family regularly attended gatherings at the Noor Islamic Cultural Center in suburban Columbus, Ohio, and her attorney said in a memo the mosque hosted extremist speakers and supported a scholar with ties to the militant group Hamas.

I had several problems with this story when I first read it but taking a bit more time to think I am beginning to believe that Rifqa maybe one smart cookie.

I had some issue with her running to Florida but it is possible that she knew she had to get out of Ohio and I am sure in her closely watched home life contacts with any Christian group other than on-line may not have been possible.

It has been several weeks now with Rifqa staying in a foster home in Florida and no wrong doing or other "dubious" actions on the part of the Christian group she ran to has been brought forward. I am starting to think this may be 100% legit, not only Rifqa's part but also in the sincerity of the pastor and Christian group. If there was even the tiniest possibility of wrong doing by the Christian group or the pastor the main stream media, which loves to attack anything with European roots (especially Christianity), would have been all over it.
I pray that the laws of Florida and Rifqa's Christian friends can keep her safe and out of the hands of a religion that preaches violence and conquest and embraces such barbarian rituals as "Honor Killings".

Friday, August 28, 2009

A Judge who finally gets it

Remember the woman from Pennsylvania who called the cops and said she had been carjacked and kidnapped?
Well she was sentenced today to 9 - 23 months for the first of her soon to be mounting convictions. The first two convictions were for misdemeanors that typically bring probation
Here is the AP article:
The judge Jeffrey L. Finley said at her sentencing
He called Sweeten, a paralegal and PTA mom, "a calculating, manipulative, hardhearted woman."
Another good quote from the story
"Your wants, your needs, your wishes and desires came before everybody,"
Well this judge has figured at least one woman out hasn't he?
In typical female fashion Bonnie Sweeten, 38 said she would not blame the stress in her life for her actions but yet the article quotes her as saying...
"I let my life slip out of control, and I did not have the proper tools or coping mechanisms to handle the enormous stress I was under," she said. "My life imploded."
So as per usual the woman once again plays the victim only this time she is a victim of her own stress since there wasn't a convenient man around to blame.
She apparently also stole $280,000.00 from her first husband's grandfather and has several other violations to also account for.
What a charming woman.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

The Angry White Liberal AND Feminist too

I read this opinion article by Matthew Continetti today. It's a good look at how liberal main stream media and reporters operate.
I just wish he would have added in some feminist examples although a number of these do cross over (in more ways than one I imagine).

Here are a few quotes:

The King of the Angry White Liberals, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, wrote on August 14 that Grassley is "flat-out despicable." Resistance to the Democrats' plans, Krugman continued, amounts to an "outpouring of hate," the result of "the paranoia of a significant minority of Americans and the cynical willingness of leading Republicans to cater to that paranoia." (For the record, more Americans disapprove than approve of Obamacare.)

I am glad he picked Krugman to talk about first. This guy maybe king of the "angry white liberals" but he is also top ass kisser of the loudmouth mangina association as well. I really need to read up more on this Krugman I swear he must have cut off his scrotum during a woman studies class at Harvard and turned it in for a term paper or something. The useless entitlement instructor more than likely still has it framed on her wall too.

The Angry White Liberal finds it simply incomprehensible that somebody might honestly and in good faith disagree with the Democrats' efforts. On August 14, blogger Steve Benen wrote on the Huffington Post that the "far-right apoplexy is counter-intuitive." After all, "Why would people who stand to benefit from health care reform literally take to the streets and threaten violence in opposition to legislation that would help them and their families?"
Why do spineless bloggers like Benen pander to women and support laws which men (and yes even kitchen bitches like Benen still count as men at least in the eyes of the law) are the unconstitutional victim of? My guess is that most Americans don't feel they will benefit from paying for every immigrants in-grown toenails but Benen thinks he is making points with the "chicks" by being a libtard.
On the Rachel Maddow Show on August 19, Star Times columnist Frank Rich warned that the current debates surrounding health care resemble the "walk up to the Kennedy assassination."
Rachel Madcow. Now there is a screamer. Sometimes in the evening when I am feeling like maybe a night out at the bar might be just the thing and I find myself thinking maybe it would be alright to hit on a few bar chicks. I just turn on MSNBC and watch this harpy - its more effective than a cold shower and a vasectomy with a rusty pair of scissors.
I don't know who Frank Rich is but when I start seeing fliers handed out with Obama's picture and profile and a target then maybe he can compare the "current crisis" with 1964 Dallas.
It is just so amazing how many liberals are also raging feminist as well.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Claire McCaskill says we can vote her out!!!

I arrived at Senator Mc Caskill’s town hall about an hour early. Parking was already overflowing down the road, which leads to Lewis and Clark middle school in Jefferson City, Missouri. As I enjoyed the sometimes-steep half-mile walk to the school entrance I began to take note of the license plates of the cars I passed. I saw a few out of state plates more specifically two Illinois, an Oklahoma, a Kansas, one from Delaware of all places and a New York plate. So maybe out of the hundred or so cars I passed by six were certainly from out of state. All six out of state cars sported Obama stickers I might add.

By the time I got in line I figured from a rough guestimate I wasn’t going to get in. Later another gentleman actually went and counted and told me I was number 314 in line. By the time the town hall opened the rumor coming down the line was 340 would be allowed in. The line itself was very well behaved. There were several pro-healthcare people walking up and down the line giving out stickers and a lot of people in line with machine printed pro healthcare signs. My estimate was about 60% protestors to 40% supporters of healthcare from what I could see from my vantagepoint. At the time they started letting people in I was at about the center of people waiting, so I would say at least 300 people were not allowed inside for the town hall.

As a side note here, I noticed something that I had already expected would happen while waiting in line. I purposefully went in very casual attire and had no outward signs of support or protest on me. I was simply wearing a T-shirt with the word ARMY across the chest and a pair of shorts. I had the good fortune to be standing in line with a rather short black woman who had immigrated from Nigeria several years ago. This woman was not a health care supporter nor was she in fact a protester yet as each astro-turf supporter came down the line giving out small signs or stickers they pointedly avoided any contact with me but tried to give my line neighbor a sticker or sign automatically. Stereotyping is ok for community organizers I guess.

Once we all got inside the senator was late but the town hall did finally get started. The time for this town hall had been changed at least three times in as many days and another interesting thing I had noticed when signing up for it that the confirmation also told me I had signed up for the Warrensburg town hall not the Jefferson City one. Ok mistakes can be made I guess.

There was only the microphone on the podium for the Senator and those in attendance were required to fill out question forms to be read.

The first question was one asking the Senator if she would vote for the bill if it were brought to the floor under reconciliation? Her answer or lack thereof, set the tone for the entire town hall. She hemmed and hawed and said something about it depended on what was in the bill and then tried to move on. She was immediately confronted by shouts of "Answer the question". A short argument began with the audience and McCaskill tried to defend her round about answer which was this time met with a loud round of "NO you didn’t".

The mood inside the town hall was clearly at least 80% anti-healthcare. Senator McCaskill never really answered a question but gave standard Obamacare canned answers. She attacked the death panel question with the same old not in the bill rhetoric, like anyone thinks the panel is outlined in the bill. Someone near me shouted that it wasn’t about a panel as much as it was about the shortage of care that could be provided. The Senator ignored that shout.

At one point Senator McCaskill said if we the people of Missouri didn’t agree with the way she represented us we could vote her out of office. There was a standing ovation and about 5 full minutes of cheering then.

At the end of this bogus town hall with written questions, no microphone for the audience and no real debate or follow up to McCaskill’s run-around answers the Senator said the one thing that rang true the whole hour.

She said she was doing these difficult town halls because she worked for the people of Missouri and that she didn’t feel anyone in the room had voted for her nor ever would vote for her anyway, so there really was no reason for her to have come.

There was more cheering and standing and clapping with her last statement as people started to exit the building.

Outside a few protesters and supporters of Obamacare had waited and seemed to be lined up on separate sides of the walkway with signs and some cheering back and forth. I waited around for a bit but didn’t see anything developing of any interest and then finally left.

All in all I would have to say this was not a good town hall for Senator McCaskill. Just my gut feeling from her arrogant attitude and lack of any real debate or follow-up questions is, she is going to vote her way no matter how much her constituents protest. With her loose promise of supporting the second amendment and then voting differently it doesn’t surprise me in the least.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Not a hate crime

Been running alot the last few days and I have another health care town meeting to attend tomorrow but I had to stop and link the AP article about the Christian/Newsome murders.
Letalvis Cobbins was found guilty of 33 of the 38 charges but it appears will not get the death penalty.
This is outrageous and to top it off this was not treated as a hate crime.
Without much time to post I need to say that this "carjacking" was not a carjacking. Their vehicle was abandoned a few blocks from the house of horrors these two were tortured, mutilated and raped in. They didn't want that car they wanted to torture and kill a white couple.
Much was left out in this story written by some AP hack. The fact that Channon Christian was not only raped repeatedly, choked, placed inside trash bags and then inside a trash can to die. The racist scum also poured bleach down her throat, anus and vagina to hide their DNA. There are also other rumors out there about other atrocities I urge you to do a simple Internet search about the couple and read for yourselves.
It is a sick crime and was not motivated by simple carjacking whether it started off as that or not is not how it ended up and for once feminists should be standing next to the people who still have morals and values and believe all men should be treated equal... not just favoritism for those who are darker.
The fact that this crime was not treated as a hate crime is more proof that the politicians who support hate crime legislation, affirmative action and more special interest entitlements are more racist than the white men they demonize could ever be.
This quote from the article especially got me:
Some conservative Internet commentators and white supremacist agitators accused the national media of reverse discrimination by failing to give the case involving white victims and black suspects the same attention paid to white-on-black hate crimes.
Investigators said the attack wasn't a hate crime, just a carjacking that went terribly wrong. Local media and The Associated Press have covered developments in the case since it began.
Ya like they have given it real coverage leaving out more details than Obama on campaign.
Well for once I will say I hope this animal meets some real white supremacist criminals where he is going. It is a sad day indeed when law abiding citizens only hope for equal treatment against racial criminals is left in the hands of other racial criminals.
Have at him boys.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Gender Gap in Happiness? Women are never happy!!!

So I read this article the other day from the "Epoch Times"
Basically this is an article about a study done by the University of Pennsylvania on the happiness scale of women since the plague of feminism. Or something like that.

Here is a link to the study PDF:

So in a rambling sort of way they are backing up what I have seen written about on numerous blogs in the men's rights sphere. Women are unhappy!!!
OMG there is a newsflash. Seriously the unhappiness of women is what got us into this bigoted, gender biased mess America finds itself in today. Why? Because women are NEVER happy by and large and seriously NEVER happy when taken as a group.... NEVER Did you get that? NEVER.

Here is a good quote from the article:
It acknowledges the improvements in women’s lives, which militants still take pains to deny with their rhetoric about the “wage gap” and so on. With this crowd, it’s always 1958. Women are supposed to be angry at all times, and angry people, by definition, are not happy people. Many observers, in fact, were not happy with the “Paradox” paper. As some commentators suggested, it could also be the case that the feminist movement sold women a bill of goods

Ya know mostly the only women I ever meet that are happy these days were the ones who were raised before 1960 or very shortly there after and ignored feminism for the most part. Not to say that plenty of women that age or older aren't just as unhappy and as much a shrew as younger women. NO. The key factor in those who figured feminism peaked at them getting a job and embraced the earlier female model they witnessed in their own mothers and grand mothers. Those women are truly happy today.

And yes I know more than a few women like that happy, supportive, STILL MARRIED after 50. In fact if it wasn't for women like that I would have turned on all women long ago but those few good ones made me think there were some good ones left so I kept trying. I have found one who seems to be but again she was raised in a two parent household, had a good relationship with her father and idolized her mother who despite being a traditional mother went on and became a lawyer herself. Now that's a roll model.

These specimen are so rare that I really shouldn't mention them.
The danger as the article pointed out in the end in a way is that unhappy women make things worse and women are still unhappy.... SO they are going to make things worse unless men finally stand up and say....
Ya know gentlemen I sometimes think feminism was really just one huge shit test (If you want to know what a shit test is follow the link to Roissey's site to the right) and we men collectively failed it.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Save the Whales - PETA Fat Woman Ad.

I just love it when two groups I can't stand start attacking each other. It just makes me feel all warm inside.
The view on this billboard is enough to make mangina's everywhere act like Ahab and grab for their harpoons but it has women's dominance and special interest groups screaming for PETA blood... LOL get it?
Here is a link on the "Man Hating" Huffington Post about it:
Be sure to watch the Onion video embedded in the article it's great.
For once I must say I do agree with PETA's final goal this is unusual because although I typically enjoy their methods with ads like these:
I never really agree with a veggy only lifestyle but if it will get rid of views like the one on the "Save the Whales" ad AND piss off feminists well maybe I should add on to my garden some.
I am betting PETA wouldn't appreciate my human defense against rapid, hungry, feral dog packs though.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Dog packs

My very first post on this blog back in April was on the second amendment and the evils of gun control. One of my primary reasons against limiting gun ownership was for defense against animal packs like feral dogs.
Here is the report of an attack which killed two people in Georgia this weekend.

As our economy slides further into the negative, packs of semi-wild and feral dogs appear more and more. I have long seen the increase in stray animals as an indicator of families moving and housing foreclosures on the rise and so far this year has been one of the worst years for strays I have seen in a long time.
As a matter of fact I have a 90 pound catahoula / lab mix I think, which was just added to my family back in March after he was left standing in my driveway by someone in a brown truck and there are at least two other smaller dogs I have seen prowling around this Summer. I have three choices with stray dogs in my area, adopt them (not financially viable for more than one) watch them closely and hope they find a home, or shoot them as not even the county sheriff will come to deal with stray dogs out here unless they attack someone or create property damage.
Regardless of whether the economy starts to mend housing foreclosures are still predicted to rise for the next few years and people far too often will not be able to take their pets with them nor leave them at full animal shelters or pay for euthanasia.
In the past I have had packs of feral dogs break into my house by actually tearing through a wooden door. That was more than 20 years ago and forced me to replace my basement door with a metal one but the destructiveness and desperation of a pack of abandoned feral dogs should never be discounted.
A pair of feral dogs can produce a pack quickly and become a very dangerous nuisance. You will know a dog born feral as within just 2 generations they will lose distinctive breed markings becoming mostly brown with white tail tips and a more medium hair length. Any person alone in a secluded spot can be in danger but that danger increases as the economy slides and the numbers of hungry abandoned pets increases. Also as cities and counties make cut backs local animal control are usually the first jobs to be cut.
Believe me when I tell you, if you are confronted with a pack of dogs your going to want the best firepower money can buy and not some bolt action deer rifle. The anti-gun left tries to convince the public that limiting what they mistakenly call "Assault rifles" is logical to allow gun ownership for hunting but remove the un-needed rapid fire weapons. But hunting is not the only reason for gun ownership and a bolt action rifle isn't going to do you much good when a pack of hungry dogs comes prowling.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Manginas - The lapdogs of Feminism

What is worse than a raving feminist woman with her entitlement attitude and ordering everyone around while she mocks everything around her with disdain? Why the sniveling mangina man who caters to such women.
I am sure you have seen them. These are the scrawny guys who are manning the community organizing tables while supporting Obama buttons who can quote all the feminist propaganda about domestic violence, wage disparity and anti-gun legislation all while shoving a voter registration form in your face as you try to walk around them.

If you don't see them at the table commenting on how lovely the red nail polish looks on his fat assed female volunteer partner or describing how a co-workers husband got out of hand with her while trying to defend himself while she slapped him for forgetting the dry cleaning. All you have to do is stick around for a bit as he is off playing go-fer and will soon show up with a round of Latte or ice cream, paid for out of his own pocket, for the self important cows he panders to.
These guys will usually pick out a fairly attractive woman to play their reverse version of fag hag for. They think they have one up on all the other men playing to their sensitive side like they could follow this woman to the bathroom and be included in the group pee/makeup/gossip session. They think it is a mark of their "manhood" to be included as an honorary member of "Chicks night out". Somehow they remain totally oblivious to the fact that they are really getting nowhere while the barbarians they like to bad mouth and listen intently as the women around them complain about, are the ones who get laid and leave.

These guys wear shorts all Summer... Ok even real men wear shorts but these manginas wear them about 4 inches shorter than real men and have thighs about as big around as baseball. They typically sport T-shirts all Summer with logos that read "Paws n Claws", "Save the Hooters" or now adays simply an Obama - "yes we can shirt".

They don't do well in direct sunlight as their glasses tint up too much and the glare from their receding hairlines makes it hard to be around them cause of the reflection. They are prepared though when the sun gets too much and can whip a bottle of lotion out of their belt packs with a flourish.

They are also proud to be the only heterosexual man they know of to have ever uttered the phrase "You go girl". They will call a real man a "Pig" or "Racist" faster than their female co-volunteers can take out a sub-prime loan but will melt into the back once the shouting actually starts.

After the fund raiser or community drive is over they will invite everyone back to their place for wine and a soak in the hot tub. Later that night they will go to bed alone thinking they really scored points running back and forth serving the women wine as they discussed how cute the young boys next door are getting.
They sure got one up on all the dumb ass men out there. They know what women want. But strangely they seem to want that too.

Friday, August 14, 2009

More about the Attack of the four women in Wisconsin Case

It appears now that the wife who coordinated the trapping and sexual assault of the man in Wisconsin now wants him released so...
He can support his family....
This case is just insane if you ask me.
The follow up article from a local Appleton Area paper is here:

Ok so I have spent alot of time in the Oshkosh - Appleton area a few years back and let me tell you there are some crazy ass chicks around there.

Maybe its the snow and cold keeping everyone inside that makes the women up there insane. Perhaps its the suicidal tendencies anyone stupid enough to drive on ice formed over a flowing fox river would have to have. But those women up there are like insane.

It's really too bad that such an obvious double standard and special treatment of raving violent women has to be plagued with so much trailer trash drama. I guess men will just have to continue to be victims of fantasy rape, domestic violence, and child abuse like this man must have been since his wife who did the reporting now wants him out to support her and her kids.

Sickening. Of course being the man to throw himself on not one but four of these fat assed old grenades should get him a vote for a medal of somekind from all the other men in the area. Hell it should have gotten him bondless release and count as community service when he gets convicted and sentenced.
Anyway just thought I would post this follow up for those interested to see. I am sure it won't get anymore large media attention.
In closing one tip for any of you who read this from the appleton - Oshkosh area. If you date any women up that way and they have a tramp stamp always check it close to see if they have some guys name tattooed on their ass under it and if they have one don't ever mention this blog site.

Opinions wanted on the group called "Oathkeepers"

I have seen this group post on 1 or 2 political blog sites over the last few weeks.

It seems like an up front group but I didn't see any high ranking or I guess even marginally higher ranking military leadership retired or otherwise supporting it. Perhaps its still really new because I had never heard anything about it before the last few weeks.

Maybe I am just insulated though.

From reading the about section on their web site I cannot disagree with their premise yet having been out of the military for almost 20 years now in an active way it does make me wonder how much the current political situation is effecting the current military.

A few quotes from their web site:

There is at this time a debate within the ranks of the military regarding their oath. Some mistakenly believe they must follow any order the President issues. But you can rest assured that many others in the military do understand that their loyalty is to the Constitution, and understand what that means

Is there really a debate within the military? I haven't heard of one but again that doesn't really mean much I have few current military contacts left to get any answers from.

We are Not advocating or promoting the overthrow of any government whether local, state or national. We want our governments to return to the Constitutional Republic which the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution defined and instituted.

Thats good to know :)

So I am looking for opinions and/or information on how big this organization is and is this a topic anyone has heard about being discussed in the current military.

I don't have an opinion about this group at this time although I do agree with their sentiments I think, but the lack of any open military supporters of a field rank or higher makes me wonder if this is needed or even a hot topic within the military.
If you have an opinion or knowledge about this group please post away. I am definately interested in what others have to say about it.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

More on the Runaway Honor Killing story

It appears the parents of the runaway muslim turned Christian girl are asking some very interesting questions.

For one they are asking why the girl had to run all the way to Florida and why a pastor was open to a minor running away to his location.

Another is how she could afford to get from Ohio to Florida without help.

Some very valid questions.
The fact that these questions are newsworthy has me asking some questions.

Would a case like this be getting media attention if say a 17 year old girl ran away and said she was afraid her strongly Christian father was going to beat her or kill her? Would that father even be given a chance to ask questions before he was arrested?

Wouldn't a girl saying she wasn't allowed to fully explore any religion she wanted to by her father be grounds enough for any abuse center or law enforcement agency to immediately accuse the father of abuse?

I am not denying that the father in this case has some valid questions. I am simply pointing out that this case seems to be getting extra attention and more equality in "protocol" because it is a Muslim family.
In a Christian setting all a 17 year old girl has to do is scream abuse and the father is arrested and charged for a hearing.
Or at least it seems that way to me.
I do seriously hope this case doesn't turn out to be some quack luring underage girls to his home and claiming to be a Christian pastor while doing so.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Are Muslim Honor Killings taking root in the U.S.?

I read this report from ABC earlier today.

In which a teen, who is not a citizen of the U.S., ran away from her parents house in Ohio to a non-denominational Christian home in Florida.

She then declared her father would perform an honor killing on her for converting to Christianity.
The article then goes on to relate another suspected honor killing of two girls in Texas who were, it is suspected, killed by their father for their "Western Ways".

Are we seeing the beginnings of events like Europe is now experiencing? Could things like this have been going on for some time in our country?
As I have long predicted the Western Left Progressives will butt heads in a big way with the traditional Muslim world sooner or later. Muslims are sneaky in their infiltration of Christian nations and typically wait until they have a fairly substancial population base before getting violent.
I know Europe has been dealing with Muslim infiltration for some time now. One has only to look at the Gates of Vienna blog site to read about the daily violence and danger to Western European culture.

With the daily conflict in America between the progressive left and the conservative right it is easy to look no further than our own noses at what may be coming soon in our country.
But that doesn't stop the fact that Muslim infiltration is still happening in increasing numbers within the U.S. and that eventually the very nature of the Muslim religion will cause it to strike against Western Christianity and democracy in much greater force than we have seen previously.

I do not see how people who daily denounce Christianity for narrow minded views on its patriarchy or what have you then turn around and protect the muslim faith. Not only protect it but nourish it and encourage it. How can everyday citizens who's only flaw is progressive brainwashing look at the Muslim religion and not see an institution dramatically more violent, more bigoted, and more oppressive than Christianity has ever been evilly mutated into?
I am certainly not some scripture quoting evangelist. I cannot even remember the last time I attended a service outside of a traditional wedding. But I respect my Christian upbringing.
All Americans need to remember that they owe Christianity and yes Judiasim as much for the freedoms they enjoy today as they owe the abstract theory of democracy. It is always time to defend the first two as much as the last.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Oklahoma uprising?

A poster from "Gateway Pundit" posted this on a couple of threads from that blog site today.
I just had to share it. No email attached for me to ask permission so I guess if the poster complains I will take it down but I doubt she (JoAnn I figure is a woman's name) will.
There is hope if individual states begin fighting back and not allowing the leftist progressive values of other states to over rule their own laws. Perhaps we can begin to see equality for all. Any reduction in the power of the federal government can only help with the mess we have found ourselves in today.
I posted this on another thread up higher, but this is something the different states can start doing, as Oklahoma is doing as follows:
"The state law passed today, 37 to 9, had a few liberals in the mix, an amendment to place the Ten Commandments on the front entrance to the state capitol. The Feds in DC, along with the ACLU, said it would be a mistake. Hey, this is a conservative state, based on Christian values...! Guess what...We did it anyway.
We recently passed a law in the state to incarcerate all illegal immigrants, and ship them back to where they came from unless they want to get a green card and become an American citizen. They all scattered. Hope we didn't send any of them to your state. This was against the advice of the Federal Government, and the ACLU. They said it would be a mistake. Guess what.....we did it anyway.
Yesterday, we passed a law to include DNA samples from any and all illegals to the Oklahoma database for criminal investigative purposes. Pelosi said it was unconstitutional. Guess what.....We did it anyway

..Several weeks ago, we passed a law declaring Oklahoma as a Sovereign state, not under the Federal Government directives. That makes Oklahoma and Texas the only states to do so. Guess what.....
More states are likely to follow. Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, both Carolina's, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, just to name a few. Should Mississippi act, so will Florida.
It appears the South is about to rise up once again. [Hopefully these and other states will get some 'guts' to stand up for their rights.]The Federal Government has made bold steps to take away our guns.
Oklahoma, a week ago, passed a law confirming people in this state have the right to bear arms and transport them in their vehicles. I'm sure that was a set back for the Kennedys and Ms. Pelosi. Guess what.....We did it anyway.
By the way, Obama does not like any of this. Guess what.....we don't care....we're doing it anyway."

Monday, August 10, 2009

Fems and Mangina's attack God and Guns

Just as I predicted after the Sodini shootings the feminist and their mangina lapdogs are attacking gun ownership and the Christian faith.
I was reading Glenn Sacks opinion on Bob Herbert's article on the Sodini shootings. The actual article is linked here:

The article is straight up mangina writing, typical of a brainwashed affirmative action sort who can further his climb up by pushing down on the devil white men and perhaps impress some fembot white chicks in the process.

What really got my eye about this article were the comments. Over 300 of them when I read it.

OK to be fair I didn't say anything about religion in my write up on Sodini. I actually am a little surprised that religion is mentioned almost as often as the availabillity of guns as to why the violence against women is so rampant.

Of course I saw only three real examples of violence against women mentioned in all the comments and that was with them going as far back as 20 years. I hardly call that rampant but these people will use anything.

I would say almost every other to every third comment post had to do with the availabillity of guns as the major issue for violence against women. Followed by established Christian religion and of course I saw a few posts blaming sports for boys. This is filtering out the constant drone of women as objects etc etc.

Interestingly enough there were very few comments blaming the workplace, courts, or schools as I have become so use to seeing over the years.

I think this shows us what is next on the feminist hit list. They have very little to attack now. We all know how anti-male these areas have become and these comments give us good insight into which targets are next on the feminist attack list which areas have not been completely feminated (is that a word?).
Christianity has long been a target of feminist but it has recently joined so closely with the progressive left and become much more leftist mainstream again. Honestly I have seen Christianity attacked for years but in my view it seems to be reaching a higher level of late. Attacking our right to keep arms will also make us more easily controlled by the police state the feminist are creating.
We must continue to strike back at feminism and attempt to get equality in the areas they have already perverted, but we must also defend the last remnants they have not yet torn down.

Sunday, August 9, 2009

The Obamacare Elephant

A friend of mine once told me that when you take on an elephant you do so a little bit at a time.
Not an original quote I know. This saying has more than likely been around since Hannibal crossed the alps and the Roman soldiers first came face to face with these large mammals.

All the other issues aside on Obama's current healthcare. Forget for a moment it promotes government paid abortion or allowing illegal immigrants care from the moment they cross into this country and before they pay a dime into it. Don't even think about the fact that it will spend huge amounts on women's health issues while men will continue to pay more into the system. Don't worry yourself that until age 55 women use healthcare 3 or more times as much as men yet will not have to pay more for their insurance like men do in auto and life insurance. Pay no mind to the fact that union members will not be taxed for this universal healthcare while everyone else will.
Put all those points out of your mind and focus on one fact.
There are approximately 800,000 doctors in the United States today. This number includes specialist and general practice doctors and is made up of about 20% foreign trained doctors as well.
It takes at least 8 years to train an intern from the time they enter college until they start their internship I believe. I am sure some can get this done much faster and I am sure some do. For emergency medical purposes lets say we count interns as doctors which may bring our total upto around 900,000.
I know that we have doctor shortages now. Long waits to get into see doctors and areas were no doctors are to be found. Yet now the leftist progressives want to start adding almost 50 million people into this mix?

Yes I think healthcare should be available to everyone but it cannot be done the way the progressives are trying to do it. The system will be totally over run and crushed.
To take on this elephant we must start by tackling it one part at a time and it seems to me the first place to start would be with making sure we recruit and train far more doctors and nurses and physician assistants to make sure the infra-structure is there to take on the extra demand.
I assure you the first cry for healthcare will be WOMEN and children first while men are expected to just suck it up and die "like a man".

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Protesting SEIU Violence

So I can get on my blog and post again!!! Hoorah!!!
I just got back from supporting the protest against the SEIU union in St. Louis. I seriously cannot believe a black man can be attacked by other blackmen sounding off with racial slurs and were encouraged to do so by the President of the United States. There I said it he is encouraging this behavior by his community activist organizations and their allied Unions.
I am talking about AFL-CIO, ACORN, SEIU, Americorp, AFSCME, and I am sure NOW is in there too and I am also sure there are several I have left out.

This incident in St. Louis is typical of the double standards the left, WHICH INCLUDES FEMINISM, uses. Blackmen beating blackmen who disagree with them. Using racial slurs but of course the attackers will get pardoned by the Obama racest regime as only white men are subject to hate crime legislation penalties.
Don't let the main stream media deceive you it was SEIU t-shirt wearing thugs who did the attacking.
Here is a link to the youtube video of the attack:
I didn't get to stay long at the protest. I just drove up and had a look mostly to see if it was going to turn ugly but the distance and such meant I had to leave soon.
I firmly believe if we are ever going to get equality for men and men's rights we must start the fight against the left and uphold the Constituttion to do so.
I urge you to support the Tea Party movement near you.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Serious Blog issues today

Tried to post a new blog today and all I been getting is an error and saying somethign about my computer or network sending out automatic hits, so I have been blocked.

Oh well maybe they will get it figured out soon.

Hope everyone else fared better and I will post anew this weekend.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

The Latest casualties of the war on men

I had to take a break and walk around a bit today to figure out how to write about this latest tragedy. I am sure everyone has heard or read about the murders committed by George Sodini at the Pennsylvania fitness club earlier this week.
When I saw the news footage on it I took it for another Man vs. Ex showdown then I read the news articles today.

This is simply horrific.

If I were to make this man out to be the victim I would be no better than the anti-male biased feminist that have created the breeding ground for men pushed to the edge that we find ourselves in today. At least no better than them in that I would be presenting the criminal solely as a victim to rationalize his actions. I will not do that.
In reading the parts of Mr. Sodini's blog that have been published (the site has been taken down) I see a man who has suffered from being marginalized, walked over, pushed aside and under rated for years. I have seen many of his postings mirrored on other sites this Summer.

Dec. 29, 2008: "Just got back from tanning, been doing this for a while. No gym today, my elbow is sore again. I actually look good. I dress good, am clean-shaven, bathe, touch of cologne - yet 30 million women rejected me - over an 18 or 25-year period. That is how I see it. ... A man needs a woman for confidence. ... This type of life I see is a closed world with me specifically and totally excluded."
Life is just playing games. ... Every evening I am alone, and then go to bed alone."

May 18, 2009: "I actually had a date today. It was with a woman I met on the bus in March. We got together at Two PPG Place for lunch. The last date for me was May 1, 2008. Women just don't like me. There are 30 million desirable women in the US (my estimate) and I cannot find one
May 29, 2009: "Another lonely Friday night, I'm done. This is too much."
How many times have I seen men write about how women ignore them, or how they have not had a relationship, sometimes they say they have never had a relationship.

This man had a good job with a law firm as an IT person, was in good shape it looks like. Yet as so many men experience these days he was just too boring or too ordinary or dare I say it perhaps too Beta to compete in today's world.
As the media turn this man into the monster he certainly turned into I hope each of us will ask ourselves why so many men in the course of this one Summer have turned to violence and finally suicide as a way to express their emotions.

I can think of six murder/suicides this Summer alone just off the top of my head. All of them multiple murders all of them ending with the man shooting himself. All of them directed at a woman or women.

I am sure the feminist will use these cases to cry out for more special protection, more money, more privilege, more reason to ban guns.

All will ignore the fact that each of these men killed themselves, only a man at the very end of his rope with no other way to express himself over come with feelings of uselessness and marginalization with no way out that he can see will turn his own weapon on himself.

I wish these men, all of them, from the jilted husband in Washington, the down on his luck man from South Carolina, the prominent professor from Georgia, the Santa suite guy from California, and now this guy and the others I don't remember had come to sites such as this one or others. They could have seen they are not alone. If I could have helped them or stopped them I would have.... Any of us would have.

I pray that enough people will begin asking themselves what drives these men to these terrible actions. I hope enough will see that these men cannot be written off as loons in the same mold as serial killers or axe murders.
These men stood at a crossroads that many of us on these blog sites have stood on as well. I wish they had chosen the fork we have all taken and tried to make some changes without falling to violence.