Thursday, September 24, 2009

First DV clinic founder says "I loathe feminism"

ERIN PIZZEY set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 - and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence. But what she has never made public before is that her own childhood was scarred by the shocking cruelty of both her parents.

There isn't really a lot I can add to this article actually.

Mrs. Pizzey has some very pointed and accurate comments on feminism and the loss of the family and man bashing along with some very good quotes from the article which I will post.

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish, would result in the complete destruction of family life.

Re-freshing to see a leader in the DV movement say such a thing.

Many years later, when feminists started demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.


I was, on reflection, following my mother's unspoken orders. Remarkably, she had manipulated me to such a degree that I was now willing to murder for her.

I would encourage everyone to read this article and also browse the comments sections at the bottom.

The beast called feminism has gone so far that even a respected founder's opinion seems to have no impact on the women who will defend their privileged new social class.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

LOL Women love a nice guy with a little thug in them

What a piece of steaming feminist crap this article from the Examiner is:

Now I won't knock the Examiner they have some pretty good articles from time to time and haven't seemed to far feminist leaning in the past, but what kind of horse shit is this:

All women have a little bad girl inside that would, with the right motivation and encouragement, love to break free. A woman needs a man who can complement that side of her.
And no, the opposite of a "too nice" guy does not have to be a straight thug. It's frustrating that nice guys tend to see the world in such black and white, polar opposite ways. In reality, there is a whole range of men in between the two extremes… in the gray area.

So get this right gentlemen your suppose to read the little slut's mind now and know what she wants at that particular moment.

It doesn't matter that she has the job you were more qualified for, or that she can have you arrested with a little story and a fake tear. No. Your suppose to overcome all this and light her spark by being confident and walking the edge.

Well Bitch I got an edge for ya and I hope you fall off.

Women want a versatile, confident and secure man that can handle himself on the basketball court, in the boardroom and in the bedroom. Women love a mature man, appreciative of family, respectful of women, children, people, and life. Women want a guy with intelligence and education, balanced with common sense and street smarts.

I hope this woman will be satisfied with a few of those points missing since their beloved feminism is keeping men out of the boardroom, the Universities and off the basketball court to pay their child support.

I think it is fitting that women cannot even see they are making what they claim to want an endangered creature. Of course what they claim to want today is never the same as what it will be tomorrow anyway.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Women's Happiness?

The recent study and paper by Stevenson and Wolfer, "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness"? Has been covered on a few men's rights blogs of late. Since I have started back to my 50+ hour work weeks I have had little time to do more than get home and take care of dinner and housework but I have kept up my reading as much as possible.

I came across this article on the paper at the Huffington Post:

An interesting article. I found it more interesting as someone who follows Men's rights closely because I feel we men from these sites know the answer that Marcus Buckingham attempts to lead his female readers to kicking and screaming.

The answer? Well to put it in it's most basic form one has only to say feminism. Yet this answer which speaks volumes to the men who have been on the paying side of feminism has no meaning to the modern liberated woman.

In his article Mr. Buckingham brings forth some facts men have known for years yet never seem to get published or any attention in the main stream media. Namely: Women working less hours, women getting equal pay and finally even out-stripping men in wages, women dominating education, and women outnumbering men in middle and upper management and now the fact that more women have retained jobs than men.

I was seriously surprised to see these facts mentioned on anything published by Huffington Post.

But there is more.

All told, more than 1.3 million men and women have been surveyed over the last 40 years, both here in the U.S. and in developed countries around the world. Wherever researchers have been able to collect reliable data on happiness, the finding is always the same: greater educational, political, and employment opportunities have corresponded to decreases in life happiness for women, as compared to men.

The study clearly shows that young women start off much happier than men of the same age but by age 39 the scales cross and men become much happier than women.

These findings typically follow what I have noticed about women and the danger age of the mid to upper 30's I have spoken about before. It is as if as their happiness levels decrease anything can be used or done to try and stop this downward spiral. Anything that is, as long as it is self centered and hostile towards men, it seems.

The article also brings to light that women and men spend about the same amounts of time doing housework.

It falls because when it comes to the sharing of 'home' duties, the trend lines are all moving in the direction you would predict would lead to greater happiness and less stress for women: namely toward greater parity. For example, between 1975 and today women's housework hours declined from twenty-one per week to seventeen, while men's jumped from six to thirteen.

As Mr. Buckingham states there is no reason in fact for women's happiness to fall. They have it all. The article doesn't mention legal matters but we know we can add those to the mix as well.

In all aspects of modern Western life women hold all the cards, yet they are still unhappy as they age.

We men know why. As the 40's close in on these women even the sexiest woman starts to wear. No matter how much money is sunk into plastic or botox. No matter how many hours are spent on the treadmill or how many calories are counted the most a woman who hits 40 can do is give herself a few brief years of playing cougar before nothing works anymore.

By 40 most women today have destroyed the man they had the most history with. The companion that would have helped raise their children. She has wiped out his money, betrayed him. More than likely lied about him and made at least some form of false domestic violence claim during the divorce she initiated. She then lived well off the child support she justified as in the "best interest of the child" that is her new car and the biggest house she can afford with the money while the college fund is empty waiting for the Ex to shell out even more money.

Sure it is easy for women to find a new sexual partner again and again at least till the dreaded 40s arrive.

Yet in the end what has feminism done for these women?

It has left them totally alone and taken away the traditional wealth women had for centuries in the family and with a husband who had been with them through it all.

Feminism destroyed everything that gave an older woman meaning and importance so that now a woman past 40 is just alone.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Feminism actually promotes violence against women?

At least that was one theory I walked away with after reading this article:

A fair bit of warning the article, although sound from a male point of view in many ways, is loooooong.. So take a drink when ya read it.

I walked away from this article with several thoughts running through my head and there were so many relevant quotes that I finally gave up on trying to remember most of them.

The author talks about how wave two feminism brought in certain values and how women wished to change men but since men are unchangeable it lead to wave three along with the death of chivalry and several other consequences leading to what we have now which is outright war.

Because most women today are feminist-minded if not actual raging feminists, virtually any woman you run into and with whom you actually manage to communicate, especially if they’re single, young or old, will be affected and influenced by the war feminists have been waging against males for decades

This statement is true and I would add to it that even women who seem to go against the mold or deny being a feminist will still visibly get their hackles up and their panties in a wad when you make a blanket statement about disliking feminist. Which just supports the quote anyway.

Moreover, now that men know that feminist-minded women, which are the majority of all women, have declared war on men seeking their obsolescence, how much less do you suppose men will now honor or respect females? How much less will they treat women kindly as friends? If we’re at war, then there can be no kindness, respect, or friendship between the two adversaries involved in combat.

The author goes on to explain that in killing chivalry the feminist opened themselves up to violence and swept away the underlying respect men had for women. Also dressing as men and acting as men contributed to this as well. Something I am sure we are all aware of here.

There is much much more to this article and the text is small but in the end the author basically states that men will not be changed and just like during prohibition will "find a way" to act like men even if they have to break the law to do so.

At heart I think this is also correct but I think the author fails to see a few more dangerous aspects of feminism especially on American and Western society. The end of male dominance as feminist call the history of the West is basically ending what kept these countries strong and defended them. This includes weakening the white race since as a race those of Western European ancestry are the only ones suffering a division because of feminism by and large.

Chivalry which is what protected these women before feminism was completely a European institution so this may explain why feminism is not catching on in other cultures or of it does it will be radically different than what we have seen in the West.

The real question is not whether feminism will win in the end because it cannot win. Feminism can only survive inside in environment created by Western European men which is a biosphere it is killing. Yet maybe it can bring down that biosphere and for those of us who have been handed the current remains of the male portion of that "biosphere" culture, either feminist domination or racial replacement equals the end regardless.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

It's all our fault guys

Well according to this author anyway.

You see the current recession was caused totally by men, and of course as we have seen in hundreds of main stream media outlets that creates the call to get more women into the financial sector.

And when the economy comes crumbling down, crashing under the weight of the imploding financial sector ... that’s right – I blame men.

Had women been holding the reins of the financial sector, rather than men, would we find ourselves in the current predicament?

Ahhhh hey.... you.... Feminist bitch... women do hold the reins for all the money spent on useless welfare and financially crippling legislation.

I could tear this fluff headed entitlement princess' article to shreds but happily there is no need.

All you have to do is read the few comments a no talent feminist hack like her generates to get all the debunking you could ever want.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

The first round of lies is out

Just as I predicted (ok I admit it didn't take a huge brain or anything but damn let me flex some)

The first round of the up-coming Obama bait and switch economy lies have started.

1. Major media Obamaphile sources will start proclaiming the He-cession is ending and the economy is on the rise.

"Domestic demand has picked up now that we have shifted from recession to recovery," Bernard Baumohl, chief economist for the Global Outlook Group, said in a note to clients.

2. The obama-nation will start wildly claiming massive job creation and/or saved jobs.

Because the economy declined less than expected in recent months, the White House said that translated to about one million jobs that would have been lost without government efforts. The report attributes much of this to the stimulus but conceded it is difficult to say for certain which of the many government economic policies contributed to the estimate.

Hmmmm 1 million jobs huh? But the stimulus wasn't for white male construction workers who are the ones mostly out of work. So who did it go to?

Well I haven't seen any new jobs but I am betting there are more than a few teachers and bored government workers tired of doing their nails that are thankful for the stimulus.

Next step is passing of a health care bill which includes abortion coverage, minority preference for treatment, elective and non-emergency care and coverage for illegals (unless they are all made legal which is just as likely) and reduced availability of health care for seniors. Also either a public option or a trick that will eventually lead to one.

I believe the countdown has started but we shall see.

450 days more or less.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

1200 calls a month to a local DV shelter?

So it is time again for the annual United way donation drive. As I have stated before one event the company I work for does is to take donations to make the few remaining male supervisors and managers wear "traditional" female dress for the day. They then parade the men in drag around to be hooted and leered at by the mostly female employees. Its pretty sad and not something the males appear to really enjoy (at least not many of them).

Every year I am offended by this event and try and hide my disdain since I need the insurance the company offers I have stayed silent on the matter.

However this year the local media celebrity/spokesman gave a speech promoting the over all fund campaign and also made the comment that the local DV shelter, which is a possible recipient of the donated money, had reported that they receive upto 1200 calls a month. He didn't say they took 1200 domestic violence calls just that they took 1200 calls. Hell it could have been 600 wrong number calls for pizza delivery but the implied message is of course that they took 1200 calls of domestic violence against women. Also 1200 calls a month would be about 5% of the local population calling in if I am not mistaken.

This statement along with the added frustration of the "drag queen march" is seriously pushing me to write a letter to the plants general manager and the local director for the United Way to explain why I find these things so offensive and will not be donating any money.

I know the United way has done some other sexist events in other cities like the "average man dating thing" which includes astronauts and nas-car drivers as everyday sort of men.

I am seriously teetering here back and forth. The money isn't that important as I could get a job easily making the same amount of money its the insurance that would bite. Also the state I live in is a right to work state which simply means a right to be fired for no reason and we don't care state.

Not sure yet what I am going to do. Suggestions and advice are much appreciated and I will let everyone know how it turns out.

I just think it is time to take a stand on such things. I am sick of the double standards.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Obama losing white female support fast

Read this article from the LA times this morning:,0,2784900,print.story

According to recent polls Obama has lost the overall white vote in big numbers since April. The elderly and the white female vote most of all.

Among white Democrats, Obama’s job approval rating has dropped 11 points since his 100-days mark in April, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. It has dropped by 9 points among white independents and whites over 50, and by 12 points among white women -- all groups that will be targeted by both parties in next year's midterm elections.

This seems to lend some support to my earlier claim from yesterdays post that perhaps women or more specifically white middle class women are also becoming dis-satisfied with the political wing of the feminist movement.

My opinion has always been that by and large Obama's white support came from the white female vote and that women's special interest groups were the ones who gathered this support for him.

"While Obama has a lock on African Americans, his support among white voters seems to be almost in a free fall," said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse.

As I posted earlier now maybe the time to actively try and gain more sympathy from white middle class females for men's rights issues.

I know so many of them comment that they are not like that, yet still take advantage of every biased law and legislation passed for them when it is useful.

But a guy can still hope can't he?

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Is this a sign of a new tide?

Recently I got involved in a discussion on rape in European countries and how the men of those countries do not seem to want to defend the native women who are the victims of said rape by mostly Muslim men.

Of course my call was that just like in America the native white men had been brow beaten and mis-used by feminism for so long now that they no longer cared. As this discussion grew at least one woman defended feminism but mentioning that the political arm of the movement...

"No longer represented or cared about white middle class women in America"

This statement made me wonder if this is a growing feeling among women and more importantly white women.

Unfortunately feminism has become so attached to affirmative action, illegal immigration, quotas and other areas that race and feminism cannot be separated anymore. Any gains feminism makes has always and will always be at the expense of white men and therefore must at some point begin hurting white women as well.

By the end of the discussion I think maybe the woman, who was very race positive, began to see just how feminism was not only hurting her but all men close to her and by and large bringing an entire race down.

Lately I have begun to notice more conservative and Male friendly women taking the spot light. Is this a sign? Could this also be a reason for the large following women like Sara Palin and Michelle Bauman seem to be getting?

Maybe it is time we as men start reaching out more to women in general and find others that are starting to see what devastation the feminist movement has wrought.

Saturday, September 5, 2009

This Answers where one Boy Went

For two years the mother and grandmother of this boy now age 7 kept him hidden in the grandmother's house. And the state couldn't find him there?

Why or, I guess I should ask how, do women manage to pass off the fact that they use every underhanded trick they can? How is it men and institutions in this country never want to believe all the false rape nor admit that these women simply use the children as tools and promote isolation from the fathers.

Luckily we are making some progress and these matters are being looked into more but so many still go unpunished and these women know they will just get a slap on the wrist so why not do it.

Of course after finally being caught red handed and openly abusing this child by isolation (ok thats kinda an oxymoron) the mother draws her last card and accuses the father of abuse as well.

What selfish, sociopaths women have become.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Where have all the young men gone?

Labor day weekend is such a drag for me. It spells the end of my annual freedom from work and yet another 9 to 10 months of mind numbing boredom as I go back to my lift and production line.

Since I continue to get paid for my annual Summer lay off I look forward to it and I spend each Summer getting pet projects finished. This Summer I built a new trailer for wood cutting, added on a huge amount to my garden and started a bee colony. OK pretty boring stuff unless your a hillbilly like me I guess.

One thing I always love about my projects is browsing hardware stores and small shops looking for just the right part or something that I can use. This year was no different in that respect but as I visited several stores and shops I did notice something missing..... Young Men.

Where are they all? Certainly there can't be that many young men overseas in the military. The local gas stations which used to be at least half or more staffed by younger men are now all female. Lowes was almost totally women with a few middle aged men working there. It was the same everywhere I looked.

Now that I think back on it I haven't seen a young male filter through the continuous flow of turn over within my own factory in well over a year.

Where are they?

I still see some after the local high school lets out but they seem to disappear after graduation and then show up again after they turn 35.

I haven't read any articles nor has an Internet search turned up any information. Maybe I am just not seeing them or maybe they leave my local area for lack of prospects. I just don't know.

Certainly I hope this isn't a trend.

Femenomics - The estrogen recession

Thanks to Elusive Wapiti for the heads up on this article from Steve Sailer.
I love it when I find a professional writer who mirrors some writing of my own and this article validates my blog post from June 26th.
Women dominated the housing boom and with the help of bogus legislation managed to get very biased legislation for easier loans. Yet feminist tend to try and blame the male "dominated" banking and finance industries and use this as yet another call to replace men with women.
Should women qua women be criticized for helping get us into the mortgage mess?
Of course they should.
Women should be reminded, frequently, that each one of them needs to be on guard against her sex’s tendency to overspend on homes
His article is one of the best I have read in a while I would recommend all males and especially white males to read it.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Femenomics - Short term lies to come

I read an AP article this morning on Joe (ManginaExtreme) Biden and the stimulus package.
All I can say about Biden is that in my estimation since the death of "Teddy" ol' Joe gets my vote for the greatest gender traitor and Man-enemy number one.
His quote:
"The recovery act has played a significant role in changing the trajectory of our economy, and changing the conversation in this country," Biden said. "Instead of talking about the beginning of a depression, we are talking about the end of a recession."
He goes on to give yet another bogus number of some 750,000 jobs saved since the stimulus package was passed overall.

This fits in with my coming prediction for the Winter of 2009 -2010.

The Progressives in power will lie and manipulate the numbers to support their cause on health care and the stimulus. We are going to see a huge media blitz this fall on how the recession is fading. Will the stock market buy into this? I cannot tell right now but as people run out of benefits for un-employment those numbers will be brandished to show un-employment is dropping when in fact it will still be rising. They have already used this tactic in prior months. Consumer spending is tricky but in fact will rise slightly for the next few months due to students returning to school and individual educational spending that although government funded counts as consumer spending.
Any jobs claimed to be "saved" or created by the stimulus bill will be in education, infra-structure and public funded "charity" programs like DV shelters etc. Just as women's special interest groups planned, this will in fact shore up the bulk of female dominated areas for the Winter and into 2010 but it will not ease the un-employment of the group hardest hit by the He-cession and will not bring in more tax revenues for 2009.

This is Femenomics at it highest macro level. The one hope it has is that female consumer spending and the female dominated housing sales will again lift construction and manufacturing. It won't.

Instead of spending money at the base which has supported female dominated institutions and the female consumer economy they elected to replace the base that creates the wealth with a pool that can only run dry and then start spending out of this pool at such a rate that it will not last. To further damage any chance of a recovery what portion of the stimulus that is going to construction type areas is earmarked Green jobs which is just another way of saying is going to create jobs for minorities.

As I predict look for alot of media reporting from NBC, CBS, ABC, and the left leaning newspapers/web sites on how the American economy is improving. Using these headlines the dems will pass the healthcare bill they want and more than likely the Cap and Trade bill through the Senate. They are already making announcements on how the town hall meetings showed more support for health care reform than against it.

Early next year we will again hit a major tax budget problem and by election time the census manipulation will void out any anger voting by the American majority.
Fall of 2010 will be the true boiling point. People understand there isn't much they can do now but once they see that they can still do nothing in 2010 which direction will they go?

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

What is up with female pets?

So my girl friend is an animal nut. She volunteers constantly at the local animal shelter and takes in "rescue" animals alot. Despite spending unthinkable amounts of money on vet bills and such she just can't help herself.

Recently a litter of feral kittens appeared in her garden shed. Luckily the mother cat moved all the kittens but for some reason left one behind. This little gray ball of hissing, spitting terror was pulled out of the garden shed and placed in a kennel cage.

So now the work begins. For instance: The kitten must be a certain weight to be put up for adoption, if it is too small the animal shelter will euthanize it (OK I didn't know this). The kitten must also be tamed, said shelter will not take feral animals and ones who spit and hiss are not adopted (OK makes sense to me). I named the kitten Helga. Why? Well because the first stage of "taming" the feral kitten is to keep it isolated and visit it with food and stuff slowly working your way up to letting it out to play some.
In short the Helsinki syndrome.
Well I must admit she has made stunning progress with this kitten and now it is simply a cute little ball of fur that LIVES to be played with and petted and is in her words "Ready for a home". This after yet another vet bill. The difference in just two weeks is just amazing I never thought that kitten was ever gonna be more than a little Tasmanian devil.
The final step in her Helsinki indoctrination program has been to introduce the kitten to other pets. OK she has a large a number of rescued pets I am not even going into how many but this is when I noticed the most curious thing in the whole process.

All female pets are mean... Not just stand offish but down right mean. This kitten can not get close to another female animal without being slapped or growled at. Yet the male pets are already treating the kitten as a valued companion.

There has to be something here. It is too much coincidence to ignore even the very friendly female border collie wants nothing to do with Helga but the male dog and cat are Helga's constant playthings. The males are downright protective of the kitten yet the females want to kill it when no one is looking.
Is this common in domesticated or wild animals? I have heard of animals adopting other animals but that has always been a female animal thing. It just seems to me that there must be some study out there about this if male animals are more protective than female ones.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Is this the lag indicator for women?

As the school year begins the full amount of budget cuts will now hit home for female dominated segments of the American workforce. Yes we have already seen cuts and protests against government shut downs (another female dominated part of our workforce). Yet most of the big money cuts in the States which were really in the red were made in prisons and education.

Here is an article about Georgia's educational cuts:

California's cuts were worse than Georgia's and other states are following. Of course unlike the private sector cuts to construction (you remember the segment of the economy that Obama refuses to give stimulus money to) these mostly female dominated (mostly is an understatement) and tax payer funded institutions will not be laid off, just given some leave without pay.
I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest the start of this school year is the actual beginnings of real change in American society. Until now the female portion of the U.S. has not really been hit with the full ramifications of this He-cession but now this will begin to set in.

Once government and education start feeling the pinch of real money hits it's all down hill. This recession cannot begin to be over until industry and jobs pick up. Most government economist like to say un-employment is a lagging indicator but that has only been a rule with past recessions. What we are seeing today is a recession unlike anything ever seen before. A recession that started because the backs of the real working class of society could no longer support the service only entitlement of feminism.
The final straw which sealed our fate to this economic mess was the outright "theft" by feminist special interest groups of the money which may have pulled us out of the downward spiral we are in.

The question is which way will the change go?

Will Obama cave to the feminist and other progressives and continue printing money to pander to their special interest spending or will it all collapse under it's own weight? Will American society see the danger and rid the president of his house majority? Even if we manage to put the brakes on this spending we still risk massive inflation within the next two years.
Either direction we go I have hopes that now is the time when women will wake up and see what feminism has produced. The smart ones have already seen it but now we may see a more widespread acknowledgement of it.